It tests whether sacrificing one person to save five is justified by maximizing overall welfare, a core utilitarian principle.
Duration of the online course: 11 hours and 1 minutes
Sharpen ethical reasoning and debate real dilemmas in this free philosophy course on justice, rights, fairness, and what makes laws legitimate—with practice quizzes.
Questions about justice show up everywhere: in headlines, classrooms, workplaces, and everyday choices. This free online course helps you build the kind of moral reasoning that lets you argue clearly, weigh evidence, and reach defensible conclusions even when everyone disagrees about what feels right. Instead of treating ethics as vague opinion, you will learn to examine competing principles of fairness, rights, and responsibility, and to recognize what each approach can explain well and where it can fall short.
You will work through famous thought experiments and real-world controversies that test your intuitions. By asking what we owe to one another, when outcomes should matter most, and when rules or rights must not be crossed, the course trains you to separate emotional reactions from careful judgment. Along the way, you will practice turning complex moral questions into precise claims you can defend, challenge, and refine.
The learning journey connects several major traditions in moral and political philosophy. You will confront the logic of maximizing overall well-being, then compare it with views that place individual liberty at the center of justice. You will explore why people might consent to government, what makes property and taxation legitimate, and how freedom, consent, and coercion shape public policy. You will also grapple with duty-based ethics that asks whether an action could be justified as a universal principle, and what it means to treat people as ends rather than mere means.
To think about fairness in society, you will examine how equality and inequality can be justified, what a fair starting point might require, and why social arrangements are often evaluated by how they affect the least advantaged. From there, you will consider character and civic virtue, asking what a good citizen owes to the community and whether justice is mainly about distributing goods, honoring merit, or sustaining a shared way of life. Finally, you will see why disagreements about rights frequently depend on deeper moral commitments, and why public debate can be both more honest and more productive when those commitments are made explicit.
Interactive exercises reinforce key ideas so you can test your understanding and improve your ability to analyze arguments. By the end, you will be better prepared to write, discuss, and decide with clarity—useful for school, exams, civic life, and any career where strong reasoning and persuasive communication matter.
11 hours and 1 minutes of online video course
Digital certificate of course completion (Free)
Exercises to train your knowledge
100% free, from content to certificate
What does the trolley problem reveal about utilitarian ideas of justice?
It tests whether sacrificing one person to save five is justified by maximizing overall welfare, a core utilitarian principle.
How do Kant and Bentham differ on the morality of actions?
Bentham judges actions by their consequences and overall happiness; Kant emphasizes duty, rational principles, and respect for persons.
What is Rawls's difference principle in theories of justice?
It holds that social and economic inequalities are justified only when they benefit the least advantaged members of society.
Ready to get started?Download the app and get started today.
Install the app now
to access the courseOver 5,000 free courses
Programming, English, Digital Marketing and much more! Learn whatever you want, for free.
Study plan with AI
Our app's Artificial Intelligence can create a study schedule for the course you choose.
From zero to professional success
Improve your resume with our free Certificate and then use our Artificial Intelligence to find your dream job.
You can also use the QR Code or the links below.
+ 10 million
students
Free and Valid
Certificate
60 thousand free
exercises
4.8/5 rating in
app stores
Free courses in
video and ebooks
Course comments: Philosophy of Justice
Ahmad Abdulrasheed Esan
A system may require temporary sacrifices from individuals, but it cannot impose rules that cause irreversible harm to the core conditions necessary "
Zulfiyaxon Aripova
Thank you
Jenny Van Der walt
Great content, I enjoyed hearing about the reasoning and different approaches. Very good course.
M V S S SASTRY
very knowledgeable and impressed