Comparison between Real Estate Funds and Physical Properties

Investing in real estate is an ancient tradition, dating back to times when land was the main form of wealth. However, financial evolution brought new ways of investing in the real estate sector, particularly through Real Estate Investment Funds (FII). While both methods aim at property-based financial returns, they have significant differences that can affect an investor's decision. Let's explore these differences.

Direct Investment in Real Estate

Direct investing in real estate involves buying a physical property. This could be a house, an apartment, land or commercial property. Return on investment comes from two sources: rental income and property appreciation over time.

Investing directly in real estate has several advantages. Firstly, you have full control over the property and can make decisions about maintenance, tenants and rental prices. Additionally, physical real estate is tangible assets that you can see and touch, which can provide a sense of security.

However, there are also disadvantages. Buying a property requires a large amount of initial capital. Additionally, the property may require ongoing maintenance, which can be costly and time-consuming. Also, real estate is illiquid assets, which means it can be difficult to sell quickly.

Investment in Real Estate Funds

The Real Estate Investment Funds (FII) are a way to invest in real estate without having to buy a physical property. Instead, you buy shares in a fund that owns a portfolio of properties. The return on investment comes from the rental income of the fund's properties and the appreciation of the fund's shares.

FIIs have several advantages. First, they require a smaller initial investment than buying a property. In addition, FIIs are managed by professionals who deal with the maintenance of properties and the selection of tenants. In addition, FII shares are traded on the stock exchange, which means they are more liquid than physical properties.

On the other hand, investing in FIIs also has disadvantages. You do not have direct control over the fund's properties and may not agree with the manager's decisions. In addition, rental income and valuation of shares can be less predictable than in the case of a property owned.

Comparison

When comparing direct investment in real estate to investment in FIIs, there are several factors to consider. One is the amount of capital you have available to invest. If you have a large amount of money to invest and want direct control over your property, direct investing may be the best option. However, if you have less money to invest or prefer to leave property management to professionals, FIIs may be a better option.

Another factor to consider is your appetite for risk. Direct investment in real estate can be less risky as you have more control over the property. However, FIIs can offer greater diversification as they invest in a portfolio of properties rather than a single property.

Finally, you must consider your need for liquidity. If you need to sell your investment quickly, FIIs are generally more liquid than physical real estate.

In conclusion, both direct investment in real estate and investment in FIIs have advantages and disadvantages. Choosing between the two depends on your individual circumstances and your investment objectives.

Next page of the Free Ebook:

13Real Estate Funds x REITs

3 minutes