Thermodynamic Cycles as Design Tools: Carnot, Otto, and Vapor-Compression Refrigeration

Why cycles are a maker’s design tool

A thermodynamic cycle is a repeatable sequence of processes that returns a working fluid to its starting state. In a real machine, the “fluid” might be air in a cylinder, refrigerant in copper tubing, or steam in a small power loop. Thinking in cycles is useful because it turns a messy device into a small set of idealized steps you can reason about, compare, and modify. Each step has a purpose: add heat, reject heat, compress, expand, evaporate, condense, and so on. When you map your machine to a known cycle, you get a checklist of where performance is gained or lost and which component changes will matter most.

As a design tool, cycles help you answer practical questions: What is the best possible efficiency for my temperature limits? Which knob—compression ratio, superheat, condenser airflow, expansion device—moves the needle? Where should I spend money on better components? The three cycles in this chapter cover three common maker contexts: (1) Carnot as a benchmark, (2) Otto as the backbone of spark-ignition engines and many small generators, and (3) vapor-compression refrigeration as the core of fridges, dehumidifiers, heat pumps, and many DIY cooling projects.

Carnot cycle: the benchmark you design against

What Carnot is (and is not)

The Carnot cycle is an ideal reversible cycle operating between a hot reservoir at temperature T_H and a cold reservoir at T_C. It is not a blueprint for a practical engine you can build; it is a ruler. Any real heat engine operating between the same temperature limits will have an efficiency less than or equal to Carnot. Likewise, any refrigerator or heat pump operating between those temperatures will require at least as much input work as the Carnot refrigerator/heat pump would.

For makers, Carnot is valuable because it ties performance to temperature limits only. That means you can quickly estimate the ceiling before you optimize hardware. If your hot side is only mildly hot, no amount of cleverness will produce high efficiency.

Carnot heat engine in four ideal steps

• 1) Reversible isothermal heat addition at T_H: The working fluid expands while staying at the hot temperature, absorbing heat from the hot reservoir.
• 2) Reversible adiabatic (isentropic) expansion: The fluid continues to expand with no heat exchange, dropping in temperature from T_H to T_C.
• 3) Reversible isothermal heat rejection at T_C: The fluid is compressed while staying at the cold temperature, rejecting heat to the cold reservoir.
• 4) Reversible adiabatic (isentropic) compression: Compression continues with no heat exchange, raising temperature from T_C back to T_H.

The key design message is that reversibility requires infinitesimal temperature differences during heat transfer and no friction or pressure drops—conditions that real hardware cannot meet. So Carnot is not a target; it is a limit.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Efficiency and what it tells you immediately

The Carnot heat engine efficiency depends only on the reservoir temperatures (absolute scale):

η_Carnot = 1 - (T_C / T_H)

Design interpretation: if you can’t raise T_H or lower T_C, you can’t beat the ceiling. For a small engine using a hot surface at 500 K and ambient at 300 K, the absolute maximum is 1 − 300/500 = 0.40 (40%). Real devices will be substantially lower because of irreversibilities and because they do not follow reversible heat transfer.

Carnot refrigerator/heat pump as a limit on COP

For cooling and heating devices, we use coefficient of performance (COP). Carnot gives the best possible COP for given temperature limits:

COP_R,Carnot = T_C / (T_H - T_C)   (refrigerator, cooling at T_C, rejecting at T_H)

COP_HP,Carnot = T_H / (T_H - T_C)  (heat pump, delivering heat at T_H)

Design interpretation: small temperature lift (T_H − T_C) is everything. If you can improve heat exchangers and airflow so that the refrigerant condenses only slightly above ambient and evaporates only slightly below the cooled space, COP can jump dramatically without changing the compressor.

Step-by-step: using Carnot as a quick feasibility check

• Step 1: Write down realistic hot-side and cold-side temperatures your device will actually exchange heat at (not just “ambient” and “inside”). Include approach temperatures: coils are typically several kelvin away from air temperatures.
• Step 2: Convert to kelvin.
• Step 3: Compute η_Carnot for engines or COP_Carnot for refrigerators/heat pumps.
• Step 4: Apply a realism factor. For small DIY heat engines, 10–30% of Carnot is often optimistic. For decent vapor-compression systems, 30–60% of Carnot COP can be achievable depending on component quality and temperature lift.
• Step 5: If the resulting expected performance is unacceptable, change the temperature limits or choose a different approach before investing in hardware.

Otto cycle: a design model for spark-ignition engines

What the Otto cycle represents

The Otto cycle is an idealized model for spark-ignition piston engines: lawnmowers, small generators, many motorcycles, and countless maker projects involving small engines. It captures the core idea: compress a fuel–air mixture, add energy rapidly (idealized as constant-volume heat addition), expand to produce work, and reject heat to return to the initial state.

Real engines differ in many ways: combustion takes time, heat transfer occurs during compression/expansion, valves cause pumping losses, and the working fluid composition changes. Even so, the Otto model is a powerful design tool because it links efficiency trends to a few controllable parameters, especially compression ratio.

Four ideal steps of the Otto cycle

• 1) Isentropic compression (1→2): Piston compresses the mixture from volume V₁ to V₂. Compression ratio r = V₁/V₂.
• 2) Constant-volume heat addition (2→3): Spark and combustion add energy rapidly; volume is approximately constant near top dead center.
• 3) Isentropic expansion (3→4): High-pressure gas expands, delivering work to the crankshaft.
• 4) Constant-volume heat rejection (4→1): Idealized heat rejection returns the working fluid to the initial state.

In real engines, step 4 corresponds loosely to exhaust blowdown and heat carried away in exhaust plus cooling, and step 1 begins after intake. The idealization is still useful for seeing how compression ratio and specific heat ratio affect efficiency.

Efficiency trend and the compression ratio knob

For the ideal Otto cycle with constant specific heats, the thermal efficiency is:

η_Otto = 1 - 1 / r^(k-1)

where r is compression ratio and k is the ratio of specific heats (often approximated around 1.3–1.4 for air-like mixtures). The message is clear: higher compression ratio increases ideal efficiency. But in practice, compression ratio is limited by knock (auto-ignition), mechanical stress, heat losses, and emissions constraints.

Practical design levers mapped to the Otto model

• Compression ratio (r): Raising r increases peak pressure and temperature, improving efficiency but increasing knock risk. Makers often encounter this when milling cylinder heads, changing gaskets, or swapping pistons.
• Intake temperature: Cooler intake increases charge density and reduces knock tendency, allowing more spark advance or higher r. Intercooling on boosted engines is a direct “move toward better cycle behavior” lever.
• Combustion phasing: The Otto model assumes heat addition at constant volume. In reality, you want most heat release near top dead center to approximate constant-volume addition without causing excessive peak pressure. Ignition timing is your handle.
• Heat losses and surface area: Small engines have high surface-area-to-volume ratio, increasing heat transfer losses during compression and expansion. Ceramic coatings, reduced crevice volume, and optimized chamber shape aim to reduce these losses.
• Pumping losses: Throttle restriction at part load wastes work. Variable valve timing, larger throttle bodies, and operating at higher load with gearing changes can reduce the fraction of work lost to pumping.

Step-by-step: using the Otto cycle to guide an engine modification

Example goal: improve fuel efficiency on a small generator engine without changing displacement.

• Step 1: Identify your constraints. Fuel octane, cooling capacity, maximum safe RPM, and whether the engine must run at fixed speed (e.g., 3600 RPM for 60 Hz generators).
• Step 2: Estimate current compression ratio. Use manufacturer specs or measure clearance volume (combustion chamber volume plus gasket and deck volumes). Compression ratio changes are often smaller than expected unless you remove significant volume.
• Step 3: Decide whether r can be increased safely. If you cannot change fuel or add knock control, be conservative. If you can run higher octane or add better cooling, you may have margin.
• Step 4: Improve “constant-volume-like” heat addition. Tune ignition timing under load to place peak pressure shortly after top dead center. Too advanced increases knock and negative work; too retarded wastes expansion potential and overheats exhaust.
• Step 5: Reduce losses that the Otto ideal ignores. Check valve lash and breathing, reduce intake restriction, ensure muffler is not clogged, and verify cooling fins are clean so the engine can tolerate optimal timing without overheating.
• Step 6: Validate with measurements. Track fuel consumption per kWh (or per hour at a fixed load), cylinder head temperature, and spark plug condition. The cycle model tells you which direction helps; measurements tell you whether real-world losses dominate.

Vapor-compression refrigeration: the cycle inside fridges and heat pumps

What the vapor-compression cycle does

Vapor-compression refrigeration moves heat from a cold region to a hot region using work input, typically via an electric motor driving a compressor. It is the dominant cycle in household refrigerators, air conditioners, dehumidifiers, and heat pumps. For makers, it is also the cycle behind many salvaged-compressor projects and thermal management builds.

The design power of this cycle comes from how clearly each component maps to a thermodynamic process. If performance is poor, you can usually localize the cause: insufficient airflow over coils, wrong refrigerant charge, a restriction, non-condensable gases, compressor inefficiency, or an expansion device mismatch.

The four main components and their ideal processes

• 1) Evaporator: Low-pressure refrigerant absorbs heat from the cooled space and boils (evaporates). Ideally, it exits as slightly superheated vapor to protect the compressor from liquid slugging.
• 2) Compressor: Raises pressure (and temperature) of the vapor. Ideally close to isentropic compression, but real compressors add extra temperature rise due to inefficiency.
• 3) Condenser: High-pressure refrigerant rejects heat to ambient and condenses to liquid. Ideally it exits as subcooled liquid to prevent flash gas before the expansion device.
• 4) Expansion device (capillary tube, TXV, EEV): Drops pressure. This is a throttling process (approximately constant enthalpy), producing a cold liquid–vapor mixture that feeds the evaporator.

Two practical terms matter constantly: superheat (how much hotter the suction vapor is than its saturation temperature at that pressure) and subcooling (how much cooler the liquid leaving the condenser is than its saturation temperature at that pressure). These are field-friendly indicators of whether the cycle is operating as intended.

Reading the cycle as a design loop

In an ideal vapor-compression loop, the evaporator sets the low-side pressure based on desired evaporating temperature, and the condenser sets the high-side pressure based on ambient and heat exchanger performance. The compressor must span that pressure ratio. The expansion device meters flow so that the evaporator is fed correctly: enough refrigerant to use the coil area, but not so much that liquid returns to the compressor.

When you change one part, the whole loop shifts. For example, improving condenser airflow lowers condensing temperature and pressure, reducing compressor work and increasing COP. Adding insulation to the cooled box reduces heat load, allowing higher evaporating temperature, which also increases COP.

COP and why temperature lift dominates

For a refrigerator or air conditioner, COP is cooling delivered divided by work input. The cycle’s COP falls as the temperature lift increases (hotter ambient, colder target temperature, or poor heat exchangers that force large approach temperatures). This is why a freezer (very low evaporating temperature) has a lower COP than a fridge, and why heat pumps struggle in very cold weather.

Step-by-step: diagnosing a vapor-compression system with measurements

This procedure assumes you have safe access, appropriate gauges for the refrigerant, and understand that refrigerants can be hazardous and regulated. Many maker projects should be limited to non-invasive measurements (temperatures, airflow, power) unless you are certified and equipped.

• Step 1: Measure air-side conditions. Record ambient air temperature at the condenser inlet and air temperature entering the evaporator. Poor airflow often masquerades as “low refrigerant.” Check for dust, blocked fins, failed fans, and recirculation of hot condenser air.
• Step 2: Measure electrical input. Use a wattmeter to log compressor power. Rising power with poor cooling can indicate high condensing pressure, restriction, or compressor issues.
• Step 3: Measure line temperatures. Clamp thermocouples on: suction line near compressor inlet, discharge line near compressor outlet, liquid line leaving condenser, and (if accessible) evaporator outlet. Insulate the sensor from ambient air for accuracy.
• Step 4: If qualified, read pressures and compute saturation temperatures. Convert suction pressure to saturation temperature (evaporating temp) and discharge pressure to saturation temperature (condensing temp) using refrigerant tables/tools.
• Step 5: Compute superheat and subcooling. Superheat = T_{suction line} − T_{sat at suction pressure}. Subcooling = T_{sat at discharge pressure} − T_{liquid line}.
• Step 6: Interpret common patterns. Low superheat with poor cooling suggests flooding/overfeeding or a failed expansion control; high superheat suggests underfeeding (low charge, restriction, or expansion device too small). Low subcooling can indicate low charge or insufficient condenser capacity; very high subcooling can indicate overcharge or a restriction causing liquid backup.
• Step 7: Tie back to the cycle components. Decide whether the limiting factor is heat exchangers (airflow, fouling), metering (cap tube/TXV issues), compressor performance, or system charge/non-condensables.

Step-by-step: designing a small cooling box (practical maker workflow)

Suppose you want to build a small insulated cooling box using a salvaged dehumidifier or mini-fridge refrigeration unit (without opening the sealed refrigerant circuit). You can still use cycle thinking to design the air paths and operating conditions.

• Step 1: Define the cooling load. Estimate heat leak through insulation (area, thickness, material), plus internal loads (electronics, fermentation heat, warm items placed inside). Oversizing the refrigeration unit is common; controlling it well matters more.
• Step 2: Choose target evaporator air temperature. The evaporator surface must be colder than the box air to move heat, but too cold causes icing and reduces airflow. Aim for a modest temperature difference by using enough evaporator area and airflow.
• Step 3: Build airflow to reduce temperature lift. Use a fan to move air across the evaporator evenly. Avoid dead zones. On the condenser side, ensure the hot coil sees fresh ambient air and can exhaust it without recirculation.
• Step 4: Add defrost/ice management if operating near freezing. If the evaporator runs below 0°C, moisture will freeze. Plan for periodic off-cycles, a defrost heater, or operating at a slightly higher temperature with more coil area.
• Step 5: Control strategy. Use a thermostat with hysteresis to avoid short cycling. Short cycling reduces efficiency and can harm compressors. If the unit is oversized, increase hysteresis or add thermal mass (water bottles) to lengthen cycles.
• Step 6: Validate with measurements. Track box temperature, condenser air temperature rise, compressor duty cycle, and power. If condenser air is very hot and power is high, improve condenser airflow first; it often yields the biggest COP gain.

Design knobs specific to vapor-compression systems

• Heat exchanger effectiveness: Bigger coils, cleaner fins, better fans, and proper ducting reduce condensing temperature and raise evaporating temperature for the same load—both improve COP.
• Expansion device choice: Capillary tubes are simple and cheap but optimized for a narrow operating range. TXVs/EEVs can maintain stable superheat across varying loads, improving robustness.
• Refrigerant charge and non-condensables: Charge affects subcooling and evaporator feed. Air or moisture in the system increases pressures and can create ice restrictions; in sealed systems this is handled by proper evacuation and driers.
• Compressor selection: Efficiency varies widely. Matching compressor displacement to coil sizes and expected temperature lift avoids extreme pressure ratios and poor performance.
• Operating temperatures: Every degree matters. If you can accept a slightly warmer cold space or provide a slightly cooler heat-rejection environment, COP improves quickly.

Choosing the right cycle model for your project

Cycle selection as a first design decision

Use Carnot when you need a hard performance ceiling from temperature limits: it is the quickest way to decide whether a concept is worth pursuing. Use Otto when you are modifying or analyzing spark-ignition piston engines and want to understand how compression ratio and combustion timing influence efficiency trends. Use vapor-compression when you are building, repairing, or optimizing cooling/heating devices and need a component-by-component map from measurements to performance.

A practical comparison checklist

• What are the “reservoirs”? For Carnot: hot and cold temperatures. For Otto: intake conditions and effective heat addition from fuel. For refrigeration: evaporator and condenser environments.
• What is the main work interaction? Otto: piston work output. Refrigeration: compressor work input. Carnot: either, depending on engine vs refrigerator framing.
• What are the dominant real-world losses? Otto: heat transfer, incomplete/slow combustion, pumping, friction. Refrigeration: compressor inefficiency, pressure drops, heat exchanger approach temperatures, throttling irreversibility.
• Which measurements are most informative? Otto: fuel rate, torque/power, head/exhaust temps, knock indicators. Refrigeration: pressures (if qualified), line temps, superheat/subcooling, airflow, electrical power.