Internal Urban Structure: Why Cities Have Distinct Parts
Cities are not random collections of buildings. They develop recognizable internal patterns because different activities (offices, housing, retail, industry, logistics, parks) compete for space. The key idea is accessibility: places that are easier to reach from many origins become more valuable, and higher land values attract land uses that can pay more per square meter (often offices, high-end retail, high-density housing). Planning rules and transport networks then reinforce or redirect these market pressures.
Four forces that shape city form
- Accessibility: Travel time matters more than distance. A site near a metro interchange can be “closer” than a site physically nearer but poorly connected.
- Land value (bid-rent): Different land uses have different willingness to pay for central, accessible locations. This helps explain why central areas often have intensive land use and taller buildings.
- Zoning and regulation: Land-use zoning, height limits, parking minimums, historic preservation, and environmental constraints can lock in patterns or create new ones.
- Transport technology: Walking cities, streetcar cities, highway cities, and rail-oriented cities each produce different densities and activity nodes.
CBDs, Subcenters, and the Logic of Centrality
Central Business District (CBD)
The CBD is typically the most accessible location in the metropolitan area, with the highest concentration of offices, specialized services, and high-order retail. It often has:
- High land values and vertical development (taller buildings).
- Peak commuting inflows during work hours.
- Transit convergence (rail/metro/bus hubs) and limited space for parking.
- Fine-grained street networks and high pedestrian activity.
Subcenters (secondary nodes)
Many cities develop subcenters—clusters of jobs and services outside the CBD—because accessibility can be created at multiple points (e.g., ring-road interchanges, rail stations, airports). Subcenters often emerge where:
- Major transport routes intersect (highway–highway, rail–rail, rail–bus).
- Large parcels allow campus-style offices, malls, hospitals, universities, or logistics.
- Zoning permits commercial floor area and parking supply.
Subcenters can reduce pressure on the CBD, but they also create cross-commuting (suburb-to-suburb travel) and can increase car dependence if transit does not connect them well.
Edge cities
An edge city is a large, suburban-based concentration of offices, retail, and entertainment—often near beltways and highway interchanges—functioning like a “downtown” outside the traditional center. Typical traits include:
- Listen to the audio with the screen off.
- Earn a certificate upon completion.
- Over 5000 courses for you to explore!
Download the app
- High job density but dispersed, auto-oriented layout.
- Large retail complexes and office parks.
- Strong regional accessibility by car; weaker walkability.
Residential Density Gradients and Housing Patterns
Urban areas often show a residential density gradient: population density tends to decline with distance from the most accessible employment concentrations (CBD and major subcenters). This is not a universal rule, but it is a useful baseline expectation.
Why density often decreases outward
- Land cost: Central land is expensive, encouraging smaller units and multi-story buildings.
- Commuting trade-offs: Households balance housing space against travel time/cost.
- Infrastructure and building types: Older inner areas may have smaller lots and attached housing; outer areas may have larger lots and detached housing.
How gradients get modified
- Transit corridors can create “fingers” of higher density along rail/metro lines (station-area apartments).
- Waterfronts, hills, floodplains and other site constraints can shift where high-value housing concentrates.
- Planning choices (e.g., upzoning near stations, greenbelts, growth boundaries) can steepen or flatten the gradient.
- Multiple job centers can create several local peaks of density near subcenters.
Land-Use Zoning: How Rules Translate into Urban Form
Zoning is the set of rules that determines what can be built where (use, height, density, setbacks, parking). It shapes settlement morphology by controlling the supply of developable floor space and by separating or mixing land uses.
Common zoning patterns and their spatial effects
- Single-use residential zones: Large areas of low-rise housing; fewer local jobs; more commuting to job centers.
- Mixed-use zones: Shops and services near housing; more walkable neighborhoods; shorter trips.
- Industrial zones: Clustering of freight-intensive activities; buffers from housing due to noise/air impacts.
- Commercial corridors: Retail strips along arterials; high visibility; often car-oriented.
- Special districts: CBD core, historic districts, waterfront redevelopment zones, airport influence zones.
Practical example: zoning and land value interaction
Imagine a station area where land values rise because travel times fall. If zoning allows only low-rise housing with large parking minimums, the area may remain low density despite high accessibility. If zoning permits mid-rise mixed-use with limited parking requirements, the same accessibility can translate into a compact neighborhood center with apartments over shops.
Transport Networks and the Shape of Neighborhoods
Transport systems create the “skeleton” of the city. The same population can occupy very different footprints depending on whether mobility is organized around walking, transit, or highways.
Network types and typical morphologies
- Radial networks: Routes converge on the CBD; strong center; heavy peak-direction commuting.
- Ring roads (beltways): Enable suburb-to-suburb movement; encourage subcenters at interchanges.
- Grid networks: Many alternative paths; can support multiple nodes and distributed retail.
- Rail/metro corridors: Station areas become density nodes; development can align in linear patterns.
Accessibility is about time, not just distance
Two neighborhoods 10 km from downtown can have very different roles: one might be 15 minutes by express rail (high accessibility, higher land value, more apartments), while the other might be 45 minutes by congested roads (lower accessibility, more low-density housing).
Suburbs: Emergence, Functions, and Internal Diversity
Suburbs are not all the same. They range from older, transit-era suburbs with compact centers to newer, highway-era subdivisions with separated land uses.
Why suburbs expand
- Space and housing preferences: Larger homes and lots become more affordable farther from high-value centers.
- Transport improvements: Highways and widespread car ownership reduce the time-cost of distance.
- Land assembly: Large peripheral parcels are easier to develop at scale (subdivisions, malls, logistics parks).
- Regulation: Zoning that limits density in central areas can push growth outward.
Suburban land-use components
- Residential subdivisions: Often cul-de-sacs and hierarchical street patterns; limited through traffic.
- Retail nodes: Malls, power centers, big-box clusters near arterials and interchanges.
- Business parks: Campus-style offices; high parking ratios; often near highways.
- Logistics/warehousing: Near beltways, airports, rail yards; requires large lots and truck access.
Urban Structure Models as Interpretive Lenses
Urban models help you interpret patterns, but they are not universal rules. Use them like “maps of tendencies,” then adjust for local geography, planning, and transport.
Concentric Zone Model (Burgess)
Interprets the city as rings around a central core, with land uses changing with distance. Useful for thinking about:
- Strong CBD dominance.
- Gradients in land value and density.
- Transitions from commercial core to residential zones.
Often modified by barriers (rivers, rail lines), zoning, and multiple centers.
Sector Model (Hoyt)
Suggests wedges (sectors) of land use extending outward along transport corridors. Useful for:
- High-income housing aligning with attractive corridors (views, waterfronts) or fast routes.
- Industrial sectors following rail lines or freight corridors.
Multiple Nuclei Model (Harris–Ullman)
Emphasizes several nodes (nuclei) of activity rather than one dominant center. Useful for:
- Metros with major subcenters, universities, airports, ports, and industrial districts.
- Explaining cross-commuting and distributed retail.
How local context changes the “model outcome”
| Local factor | Likely modification to pattern |
|---|---|
| Coastline or major river | CBD and high-value housing may align along waterfront; limited expansion in one direction |
| Mountain/hill constraints | Development concentrates in valleys; steep slopes remain low density or protected |
| Greenbelt/growth boundary | Higher densities inside boundary; leapfrog development beyond if demand is strong |
| Strong rail network | Station-centered nodes; higher density along corridors; less reliance on highways |
| Highway-first planning | Edge cities, retail strips, logistics clusters; more dispersed job locations |
Diagnostic Skill: Read a Stylized Urban Map Like a Geographer
This section gives you a repeatable method to analyze an urban map (even a simplified one) to identify land-use zones, predict commuting flows, and infer likely locations for industry, retail, and high-density housing.
Step-by-step diagnostic approach
- Locate the highest-accessibility nodes. Mark the CBD (often where the densest street grid and transit convergence occur). Then mark major interchanges, rail hubs, ports, and airports as potential subcenters.
- Trace the main transport corridors. Identify radial highways/rail lines and any ring road. Corridors often predict sector-shaped land uses and linear retail.
- Identify physical constraints. Rivers, coastlines, steep slopes, floodplains, and protected land redirect growth and can create sharp edges in the urban footprint.
- Infer land value surfaces. Assume land value is highest at the CBD and at major nodes, then declines with travel time. Adjust upward near waterfronts or scenic/high-amenity areas.
- Assign likely land uses by bid-rent logic. Put the most space-intensive, lower-paying uses (warehousing, heavy industry) where land is cheaper but truck access is strong; put high-paying uses (offices, specialized retail) at top-accessibility nodes.
- Check zoning cues. If the map shows industrial parks, greenbelts, or protected districts, treat them as constraints that can override market tendencies.
- Predict commuting flows. Draw arrows from major residential concentrations to major job nodes. Expect strong inbound flows to the CBD if it dominates; expect many suburb-to-suburb flows if multiple nuclei exist.
- Spot mismatch and pressure points. Look for areas where high accessibility meets low allowed density (likely housing price pressure) or where jobs cluster without transit (likely congestion and parking demand).
Worked example (stylized map description)
Assume a simplified metro map has: (1) a CBD at the river crossing, (2) two radial highways, (3) a ring road, (4) a freight rail line to a port, and (5) a metro line with five stations.
- CBD: Place high-rise offices, government services, major cultural venues, and the highest-order retail near the river crossing and transit hub.
- High-density housing: Place apartments around metro stations (especially those 2–6 stops from the CBD) and near inner-ring neighborhoods with short travel times.
- Industry and logistics: Place warehousing near the ring road–freight rail junction and near the port approach, where trucks can avoid inner-city congestion.
- Retail: Place regional retail (mall/power center) at a ring-road interchange; place linear retail strips along arterial roads connecting suburbs.
- Subcenter/edge city: If one ring-road interchange also connects to the airport road and has large parcels, predict an office/retail cluster there.
- Commuting: Expect CBD-bound flows from inner and middle suburbs by metro/highway; expect suburb-to-suburb flows between residential areas and the ring-road subcenter.
Quick checklist for learners
- Where do routes converge? (likely CBD/subcenter)
- Where is truck access best with minimal conflict with housing? (likely logistics/industry)
- Where can density be supported by transit? (likely apartments and mixed-use)
- Where do zoning constraints prevent intensification? (likely spillover growth elsewhere)
- Is the city mostly one-center or multi-center? (predict commuting pattern)
Practice Task: Annotate and Interpret
Use the diagnostic steps on any simple city diagram (or a real map). Create three layers:
- Layer 1 (Nodes): CBD, subcenters, interchanges, stations, port/airport.
- Layer 2 (Likely land-use zones): high-density residential, low-density residential, industrial/logistics, retail corridors, mixed-use centers.
- Layer 3 (Flows): arrows for commuting (AM peak direction), freight routes, and shopping trips to major retail nodes.
Then answer: Which locations are most likely to experience congestion? Where would upzoning near transit reduce travel demand? Which neighborhoods are likely to have the highest land values, and why?