Quantum Physics Foundations: Quantization in Atoms and Discrete Energy Levels

1) Bound systems: why only certain wave patterns are stable

In a bound system (like an electron held near a nucleus by an attractive force), the particle’s quantum state is described by a wave-like state that must “fit” the physical constraints of the system. The key idea is that not every wave pattern can persist: only those that are self-consistent with the boundary conditions and remain finite and well-behaved everywhere are allowed.

Standing-wave constraints in bound states

A helpful mental model is a standing wave on a string fixed at both ends. Only wavelengths that place nodes exactly at the fixed ends can persist as stable patterns. Similarly, for an electron bound to a nucleus, the state must satisfy constraints such as:

• Normalizability: the total probability of finding the electron somewhere must be 1, so the wavefunction must not blow up at infinity.
• Single-valuedness and smoothness: the state must be consistent when you go around in space; it cannot be multi-valued or contain unphysical discontinuities.
• Boundary behavior: near the nucleus and far away, the solution must remain finite and match the physical potential.

These constraints act like a “filter” that rejects most candidate wave patterns. The surviving patterns are the allowed states (also called stationary states).

Why allowed states imply discrete energies

For a given binding potential, the mathematical equation that determines allowed states (the time-independent Schrödinger equation) behaves like an eigenvalue problem: only certain wave patterns exist, and each comes with a specific energy value. Energies are not chosen freely; they are the values for which a physically acceptable standing-wave-like solution exists.

Intuitively: if you try to force an “in-between” energy, the corresponding wave pattern typically fails one of the constraints (it diverges, oscillates incorrectly at large distance, or cannot be normalized). Therefore, bound states come in a discrete set, and so do their energies: energy levels.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

2) Quantum numbers as labels for allowed patterns

Because there are multiple distinct allowed wave patterns, we need a systematic way to label them. Quantum numbers are simply labels that identify which standing-wave pattern (which allowed state) you mean.

For atoms, the most common conceptual labels are:

• Principal label (often n): distinguishes different “families” of bound states, strongly tied to energy for hydrogen-like atoms (one electron around a nucleus).
• Angular pattern label (often l): distinguishes different shapes of the spatial distribution (how the wave varies with angle).
• Orientation label (often m): distinguishes different spatial orientations of the angular pattern relative to a chosen axis.
• Spin label (often ms): labels the electron’s intrinsic two-valued degree of freedom, which affects how states are occupied and how transitions can occur.

You can think of these labels as describing the “mode numbers” of a 3D standing-wave pattern: how many nodes appear in different directions and how the pattern is oriented.

3) Orbitals: probability clouds, shapes, and nodes (not trajectories)

An orbital is a particular allowed spatial state for an electron in an atom. It is not a path the electron travels. Instead, it is a probability distribution in space derived from the wavefunction.

From wavefunction to probability cloud

If the electron’s spatial state is described by a wavefunction ψ(x,y,z), then the probability density of finding the electron near a point is proportional to:

|ψ(x,y,z)|^2

Plotting surfaces of constant |ψ|^2 (or shading regions by density) produces the familiar “cloud” pictures. Dense regions mean the electron is more likely to be found there if you measure position; sparse regions mean less likely.

Physical meaning of orbital shapes

Orbital shapes reflect the standing-wave structure in 3D:

• s-like orbitals: roughly spherical probability clouds. Their symmetry means the probability depends mainly on distance from the nucleus.
• p-like orbitals: two-lobed distributions separated by a nodal plane (a plane where probability density is zero).
• d-like orbitals: more complex multi-lobed shapes with additional nodal surfaces.

These shapes are not artistic choices; they are the geometry of allowed wave patterns under the atomic potential and boundary constraints.

Nodes: where the probability is exactly zero

A node is a region (point, line, plane, or surface) where the wavefunction is zero, so |ψ|^2 = 0. Nodes matter because they are direct evidence of wave structure:

• More nodes generally correspond to higher energy within a given type of motion, because more rapid spatial variation typically implies greater kinetic-energy contribution.
• Nodes partition space into lobes where the wavefunction may have different signs (phases). The sign itself is not a probability, but it affects interference and transition amplitudes.

In atoms, nodes come in different types (radial nodes vs angular nodes), matching the idea that the standing-wave pattern can have “zero surfaces” in different directions.

4) Transitions: changing energy levels and exchanging photons

When an atom changes from one allowed bound state to another, its energy changes. Because energy is conserved, the atom must exchange energy with the electromagnetic field.

Emission and absorption

• Emission: the atom goes from a higher-energy state to a lower-energy state and releases a photon.
• Absorption: the atom takes in a photon and moves from a lower-energy state to a higher-energy state.

The photon energy must match the energy difference between the initial and final atomic levels:

E_photon = |E_initial − E_final|

Photon frequency and wavelength follow:

E_photon = h f = (h c)/λ

So discrete atomic energy differences imply discrete photon frequencies: this is the origin of spectral lines.

Why transitions are not arbitrary

Even if two levels exist, a transition between them may be strongly allowed, weakly allowed, or effectively forbidden depending on how the spatial patterns “match” the electromagnetic interaction. Qualitatively, the photon field couples more effectively when the initial and final probability amplitudes overlap in the right way and when the change in angular pattern is compatible with the photon carrying one unit of angular momentum.

5) Spectral lines as fingerprints of level differences

A spectrum is a record of which photon energies an atom can emit or absorb. Because each line corresponds to a specific energy difference, the set of lines acts like a fingerprint.

Structured walkthrough: from levels to lines

Imagine an atom with discrete energy levels E1 < E2 < E3 < E4. The possible emitted photon energies come from all downward transitions:

• E4 → E3 gives ΔE = E4 − E3
• E4 → E2 gives ΔE = E4 − E2
• E4 → E1 gives ΔE = E4 − E1
• E3 → E2 gives ΔE = E3 − E2
• E3 → E1 gives ΔE = E3 − E1
• E2 → E1 gives ΔE = E2 − E1

Each distinct ΔE corresponds to a line at frequency f = ΔE/h (or wavelength λ = hc/ΔE).

Emission vs absorption spectra

• Emission spectrum: bright lines at photon energies the atom can emit (downward transitions).
• Absorption spectrum: dark lines at photon energies the atom can absorb (upward transitions), provided the initial state is populated (often the ground state in a cool gas).

In many practical situations, absorption lines mainly correspond to transitions starting from the lowest available level, because most atoms begin there.

Why line patterns are distinctive

Different atoms (and even different electronic configurations of the same atom) have different sets of energy levels and different allowed transitions. That changes:

• the spacing between levels (hence photon energies),
• which transitions are strong vs weak,
• and how many lines appear in a given energy range.

6) Practice: reading an energy-level diagram and predicting photons

This practice is designed to build the habit: levels → differences → photons, then apply a qualitative sense of which transitions are likely.

Practice setup: an example energy-level diagram

Suppose an atom has four bound levels with energies (in electronvolts):

• E1 = −10.0 eV
• E2 = −7.0 eV
• E3 = −3.0 eV
• E4 = −1.0 eV

Assume the atom is initially in E4 and can emit photons by dropping to lower levels.

Step-by-step: list all possible emitted photon energies

Step 1: Identify all downward transitions from the initial level.

• E4 → E3
• E4 → E2
• E4 → E1

Step 2: Compute each energy difference.

• ΔE(4→3) = E4 − E3 = (−1.0) − (−3.0) = 2.0 eV
• ΔE(4→2) = (−1.0) − (−7.0) = 6.0 eV
• ΔE(4→1) = (−1.0) − (−10.0) = 9.0 eV

Step 3: Convert to photon frequency or wavelength if needed. Use f = ΔE/h or λ = hc/ΔE. A convenient approximation is hc ≈ 1240 eV·nm, so:

• λ(2.0 eV) ≈ 1240/2.0 ≈ 620 nm
• λ(6.0 eV) ≈ 1240/6.0 ≈ 207 nm
• λ(9.0 eV) ≈ 1240/9.0 ≈ 138 nm

Extending the cascade: secondary photons

If the atom drops from E4 to E2, it may later drop from E2 to E1, emitting another photon:

• ΔE(2→1) = (−7.0) − (−10.0) = 3.0 eV → λ ≈ 1240/3.0 ≈ 413 nm

So a single initial excitation can produce multiple lines through a cascade of allowed steps.

Which transitions are “allowed”? (qualitative selection-rule intuition)

Real atoms have additional structure: each level corresponds to a specific orbital pattern with quantum numbers. Without doing detailed calculations, you can apply a simple qualitative rule of thumb for strong optical transitions (electric dipole transitions):

• The orbital angular pattern typically changes by one step: “change in shape class by one” (often summarized as Δl = ±1).
• The orientation label changes by at most one step (often Δm = 0, ±1).
• Spin usually does not change in a strong transition (often Δs = 0).

Interpretation: the photon carries one unit of angular momentum, so the electron’s orbital pattern must adjust accordingly. Transitions that do not satisfy this matching are not impossible in principle, but they are much weaker (or effectively absent in many spectra).

Practice variant with labeled levels

Now suppose the same four energies correspond to these orbital types (labels are conceptual):

• E1: s-like
• E2: p-like
• E3: s-like
• E4: d-like

Task A: List all downward transitions and mark which are likely strong.

• d → s (from E4 to E3): this changes by two shape steps (d to s), so it is typically not a strong dipole transition.
• d → p (from E4 to E2): changes by one step, typically allowed/strong.
• d → s (from E4 to E1): again typically not strong.

Task B: Predict which photon energies dominate the emission. Using the earlier energy differences, the E4 → E2 line at 6.0 eV would be expected to be much stronger than the 2.0 eV or 9.0 eV lines if those correspond to dipole-forbidden changes.

Task C: Follow the cascade with the same intuition. If E2 is p-like and E1 is s-like, then p → s is typically allowed/strong, so after emitting the 6.0 eV photon, the atom may emit an additional 3.0 eV photon on the way to the ground state.