Population and Settlement Geography: Core Questions and Key Measures

Course Focus: Explaining Uneven Population and Varied Settlement Forms

This course examines two linked patterns: (1) population is not spread evenly across Earth’s surface, and (2) settlements (villages, towns, cities, suburbs, informal areas) take different shapes and densities. The goal is to build a practical toolkit for describing these patterns accurately and for explaining them using geographic reasoning rather than assumptions.

What you will practice

• Describing where people live using maps and measures.
• Explaining why there: identifying location factors that attract or sustain settlement.
• Explaining why not elsewhere: recognizing constraints and barriers.
• Tracking how patterns change over time: growth, decline, redistribution, and changing settlement form.

Core Geographic Questions (A Reusable Framework)

1) Where is the population located?

Start with description: identify clusters, corridors, and sparsely populated areas. Use consistent spatial units (country, province, county, census tract) and note scale: a pattern visible at national scale may disappear at neighborhood scale.

2) Why is it located there?

Look for enabling factors such as access (transport routes, ports), resources (water, fertile soils), economic opportunities (jobs, markets), and services (schools, healthcare). The key is to connect a factor to a mechanism: for example, “near a river” matters because it supports irrigation, transport, and water supply.

3) Why is it not located elsewhere?

Identify constraints: steep terrain, aridity, flood risk, extreme cold/heat, protected land, lack of infrastructure, or political barriers. “Not elsewhere” is often about costs and risks, not impossibility.

4) How do patterns change?

Patterns shift through natural increase, migration, economic restructuring, infrastructure investments, and environmental change. When describing change, specify: what changed (density, distribution, concentration), where it changed, and over what time period.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Measurement Toolkit: Definitions, Formulas, and Interpretation

Geographers use a small set of measures to compare places fairly. Each measure answers a different question. The most common mistakes come from using the wrong measure for the question or mixing totals with rates.

Arithmetic Density

What it measures: average number of people per unit of total land area.

Formula:

Arithmetic Density = Total Population / Total Land Area

Interpretation: useful for broad comparisons (e.g., Region A vs. Region B). It does not tell you where within the region people live, and it can hide internal variation.

Physiological Density

What it measures: number of people per unit of arable (farmable) land area.

Formula:

Physiological Density = Total Population / Arable Land Area

Interpretation: indicates pressure on productive land. Two places with similar arithmetic density can have very different physiological density if one has little arable land.

Agricultural Density

What it measures: number of farmers per unit of arable land area.

Formula:

Agricultural Density = Number of Farmers / Arable Land Area

Interpretation: often used as a proxy for agricultural intensity and technology. Lower agricultural density can indicate mechanization (fewer farmers needed per hectare), but interpretation depends on local context.

Population Concentration

What it describes: how clustered or dispersed population is within a region (the degree to which people are concentrated in a smaller portion of space).

How it is commonly assessed in practice: by comparing shares of population to shares of land area across subregions (e.g., districts). A simple way to communicate concentration is to show that a small share of land contains a large share of people.

Simple concentration indicator (share comparison):

Concentration Ratio (informal) = (Population share in selected areas) / (Land-area share of those areas)

Interpretation: values greater than 1 indicate that the selected areas hold more people than expected from their land share (they are relatively concentrated).

Population Distribution

What it describes: the spatial arrangement of people across space (where people are located), often summarized as patterns such as clustered, linear (corridor), dispersed, or polycentric (multiple centers).

How it is shown: maps (choropleth, dot density, proportional symbols), settlement pattern descriptions, and comparisons across scales.

Worked Examples with Small Datasets (Step-by-Step)

Example 1: Arithmetic Density (Totals vs. Rates)

Two districts have different populations and areas. Compute arithmetic density to compare “people per km²” rather than total population.

Step 1: Apply the formula.

• District A: 12,000 / 60 = 200 people/km²
• District B: 20,000 / 200 = 100 people/km²

Interpretation: District B has a larger total population, but District A is denser. A common pitfall is to assume “more people” means “more dense.” Density is a rate, not a total.

Example 2: Physiological Density (Pressure on Arable Land)

Now include arable land. Suppose both districts have the same total population as above, but different arable land areas.

Step 1: Compute physiological density.

• District A: 12,000 / 15 = 800 people per km² of arable land
• District B: 20,000 / 80 = 250 people per km² of arable land

Interpretation: District A has much higher pressure on farmable land. This does not automatically mean hunger or poverty; it signals that land is relatively scarce compared to the number of people relying on the region’s productive capacity.

Example 3: Agricultural Density (Farmers per Arable Land)

Assume the number of farmers differs between districts.

Step 1: Compute agricultural density.

• District A: 3,000 / 15 = 200 farmers per km² arable
• District B: 2,000 / 80 = 25 farmers per km² arable

Interpretation practice: District A likely uses more labor per unit land (possibly smaller farms or less mechanization). District B may have larger farms or more mechanized production. Pitfall: do not interpret “lower agricultural density” as “less farming”; it can mean fewer farmers are needed.

Population Concentration vs. Population Distribution (Do Not Mix Them)

Quick distinction

• Distribution is the pattern of where people are located (clustered, linear, dispersed).
• Concentration is the degree to which people are packed into a smaller share of the area.

Example 4: A Simple Concentration Check Using Shares

A region has 4 zones. Compute how concentrated the population is in the smallest land share.

Step 1: Compute totals.

• Total land = 10 + 20 + 30 + 40 = 100 km²
• Total population = 9,000 + 6,000 + 3,000 + 2,000 = 20,000

Step 2: Identify the smallest land share with the largest population share (here, Zone 1).

• Zone 1 land share = 10/100 = 10%
• Zone 1 population share = 9,000/20,000 = 45%

Step 3: Compute an informal concentration ratio for Zone 1.

Concentration Ratio = 45% / 10% = 4.5

Interpretation: Zone 1 holds 4.5 times the population you would expect if people were evenly spread by land area. This is a clear sign of high concentration.

Map-Reading Tasks: Choropleth vs. Dot Density (and Common Pitfalls)

Choropleth maps (shaded areas)

What they show well: rates and ratios (e.g., people per km², percent urban, fertility rate). Each area is shaded based on a value.

Common pitfall: interpreting a large shaded area as “more people.” Choropleths are best for rates, not totals. A large rural county can look visually dominant even if it has fewer people than a small urban county.

Dot density maps (dots represent counts)

What they show well: distribution and clustering of totals (e.g., 1 dot = 1,000 people). Dots reveal corridors and clusters more intuitively than choropleths.

Common pitfall: assuming dots show exact household locations. Dots are usually placed within areas using an algorithm; they represent counts, not precise addresses. Another pitfall is forgetting the dot value (1 dot might represent 500, 1,000, or 10,000 people).

Task 1: Choose the right map type

• If the question is “Which district is densest?” use a choropleth of density.
• If the question is “Where are the main clusters and corridors of settlement?” use a dot density map.
• If the question is “Which district has the most people?” use a proportional symbol map or a table of totals (not a choropleth of density).

Task 2: Practice interpreting a choropleth legend (mini-exercise)

Imagine a choropleth legend for population density (people/km²):

• 0–50 (light)
• 51–200 (medium)
• 201–1,000 (dark)

Question: If District A is shaded dark and District B is shaded medium, what can you conclude?

• You can conclude A has a higher density category than B.
• You cannot conclude A has a higher total population than B without population totals and area context.

Task 3: Practice interpreting a dot density map (mini-exercise)

Assume 1 dot = 500 people. A small urban municipality contains 40 dots; a large rural county contains 30 dots.

• Urban municipality total ≈ 40 × 500 = 20,000 people
• Rural county total ≈ 30 × 500 = 15,000 people

Pitfall check: Even if the rural county covers much more land, the dot density map is communicating totals via dot counts. To compare density, you would still need area.

Common Interpretation Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)

• Total vs. rate confusion: “has more people” is not the same as “is denser.” Always ask: is the map/table showing totals or per-unit values?
• Density vs. crowding: density is an average over an area; crowding is experienced at specific places (e.g., a busy transit station). A region can have low average density but still have crowded nodes.
• Wrong denominator: arithmetic density uses total land; physiological and agricultural density use arable land. Check what “area” means before interpreting.
• Scale mismatch: a national average can hide extreme local clustering. When possible, compare multiple scales (region and subregion).
• Boundary effects: changing district boundaries can change densities and choropleth patterns even if people did not move. Be cautious when comparing across different boundary systems.