Microeconomics Essentials: Market Efficiency and Deadweight Loss from Misallocation

Efficiency in the Competitive Model: Total Surplus as the Target

In the basic competitive model, an outcome is efficient when it maximizes total surplus (the total gains from trade). Think of total surplus as the size of the “pie” created when buyers and sellers trade: efficiency means choosing the quantity that makes this pie as large as possible.

A practical way to see efficiency is to compare, unit by unit, a buyer’s willingness to pay (marginal benefit) with a seller’s opportunity cost (marginal cost). A trade is efficient when the buyer values the unit at least as much as it costs society to produce it.

• Efficient trade rule (per unit): trade the unit if MB ≥ MC.
• Stop rule: stop when the next unit would have MB < MC.

In a competitive market without distortions, the equilibrium quantity is the quantity where marginal benefit equals marginal cost, so it coincides with the efficient quantity.

Identifying Efficient Trades (Unit-by-Unit Logic)

Imagine ranking potential trades from “most valuable” to “least valuable” on the demand side, and from “cheapest to produce” to “most costly” on the supply side. Efficiency means matching these up as long as value exceeds cost.

The efficient quantity here is 3 units: the first three units have nonnegative gains from trade; the fourth would destroy surplus.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Deadweight Loss: Lost Gains from Trade When Quantity Is Wrong

Deadweight loss (DWL) is the lost gains from trade that occur when a distortion causes the market quantity to be below or above the efficient quantity. It is “deadweight” because it is surplus that no one receives: it is not transferred to someone else; it disappears.

• Quantity too low (underproduction): some units with MB > MC are not traded, so mutually beneficial trades are missed.
• Quantity too high (overproduction): some units with MB < MC are traded, so resources are used to produce units worth less than their cost.

Graphical Area Reasoning (Before/After Comparison)

Use the demand curve as marginal benefit and the supply curve as marginal cost. The efficient quantity is where they intersect. A distortion (like a tax, a price control, a quota, or a subsidy) can push the traded quantity away from that intersection.

Case A: Quantity below efficient (Q < Q*)

• Before (efficient): trade up to Q*, where MB = MC.
• After (distorted): only Qd trades occur, with Qd < Q*.
• Lost trades: units from Qd to Q* would have had MB > MC.
• DWL area: the triangle between demand and supply over the range [Qd, Q*].

Case B: Quantity above efficient (Q > Q*)

• After (distorted): quantity becomes Qs, with Qs > Q*.
• Excess trades: units from Q* to Qs have MB < MC.
• DWL area: the triangle between supply and demand over the range [Q*, Qs].

Why DWL Is a Triangle in Linear Examples

When demand and supply are linear, the “gap” between marginal benefit and marginal cost changes linearly as you move away from the efficient quantity. The lost surplus from the misallocated units forms a triangle:

• Base: the number of misallocated units (|Q* − Q_distorted|).
• Height: the wedge between marginal benefit and marginal cost at the distorted quantity (often created by a tax/subsidy or by the price gap induced by a control).
• Area: DWL = 1/2 × base × height.

Illustrating Lost Trades with a Simple “Wedge”

A convenient way to model many distortions is as a wedge between what buyers pay and what sellers receive. For example, a per-unit tax t creates a wedge of size t between the price paid by buyers and the price received by sellers. The key efficiency effect is that the wedge reduces the quantity traded below the efficient level.

Even without drawing the full graph, you can reason in areas: the wedge creates a vertical gap between the marginal benefit and marginal cost relevant for the trade decision, shrinking the traded quantity and generating a DWL triangle.

Step-by-Step: DWL from Underproduction (Linear Example with a Per-Unit Tax)

Suppose demand and supply are:

Demand:  P = 100 − 2Q  (marginal benefit) Supply:  P = 20 + Q     (marginal cost)

Step 1: Find the efficient (competitive) equilibrium quantity Q*

Set demand equal to supply:

100 − 2Q = 20 + Q  80 = 3Q  Q* = 26.67

Step 2: Introduce a per-unit tax t and find the distorted quantity Qt

A tax creates a wedge: buyers pay P_b, sellers receive P_s, and P_b = P_s + t. Using inverse curves, the traded quantity satisfies:

Demand price = Supply price + t  (100 − 2Q) = (20 + Q) + t

Let t = 15:

100 − 2Q = 20 + Q + 15  65 = 3Q  Qt = 21.67

Step 3: Compute the quantity reduction (the base of the DWL triangle)

ΔQ = Q* − Qt = 26.67 − 21.67 = 5

Step 4: Compute the height of the DWL triangle

In this wedge setup, the height equals the per-unit wedge at the margin, which is the tax t (15).

Height = t = 15

Step 5: Compute DWL

DWL = 1/2 × base × height = 1/2 × 5 × 15 = 37.5

Interpretation: the tax causes 5 mutually beneficial trades to disappear; the average lost gains from trade per missing unit is about half the wedge (because the gap grows from 0 at Q* to t at Qt in a linear model), giving the triangular area.

Step-by-Step: DWL from Overproduction (Linear Example with a Per-Unit Subsidy)

Use the same demand and supply:

Demand:  P = 100 − 2Q Supply:  P = 20 + Q

Now suppose there is a per-unit subsidy s = 12 paid to sellers. This creates a wedge in the opposite direction: buyers pay P_b, sellers effectively receive P_b + s. Quantity satisfies:

Demand price + s = Supply price  (100 − 2Q) + s = 20 + Q

Step 1: Efficient quantity Q* (already computed): Q* = 26.67

Step 2: Distorted quantity Qs

100 − 2Q + 12 = 20 + Q  92 = 3Q  Qs = 30.67

Step 3: Base

ΔQ = Qs − Q* = 30.67 − 26.67 = 4

Step 4: Height

Height equals the wedge s (12).

Height = s = 12

Step 5: DWL

DWL = 1/2 × 4 × 12 = 24

Interpretation: the subsidy induces 4 extra units where marginal cost exceeds marginal benefit; those units waste resources relative to what buyers value them at.

Connecting the Area to “Lost Trades” Intuition

Whether quantity is too low or too high, DWL is always about trades that should not be missing (when MB > MC) or trades that should not be happening (when MB < MC). The triangle is a compact way to add up the net gains from trade that are not realized.

Checklist: Diagnosing Misallocation and DWL

• 1) Locate the efficient quantity: where MB = MC (demand meets supply).
• 2) Identify the distortion: what creates a wedge or constraint that changes the traded quantity?
• 3) Compare quantities: is Q_distorted below or above Q*?
• 4) Mark the misallocated range: [Q_distorted, Q*] or [Q*, Q_distorted].
• 5) Compute DWL: for linear cases, use 1/2 × base × height.

Reflection Prompts (Tradeoffs Without Moralizing)

• When a policy reduces quantity traded, what kinds of mutually beneficial transactions might be missing in your local context (housing, childcare, ride services, medical visits)?
• If a policy increases quantity traded, what resources (time, labor, materials) might be pulled into producing units that buyers value less than they cost to produce?
• Deadweight loss measures lost surplus, not who gains or loses from transfers. In a real decision, what other objectives (risk reduction, access, stability, simplicity) might be weighed alongside DWL?
• What information would you need to estimate the “base” (quantity change) and “height” (wedge) for a real market you care about?