Map Grids and Projections: Why Coordinates Look Different on Flat Maps

1) Why map projections are necessary (and why distortion is unavoidable)

Latitude and longitude describe positions on a curved surface. A flat map is a plane. Any method that “projects” points from a sphere (or spheroid) onto a plane must stretch, compress, or bend something. This is called distortion.

A useful way to think about it: imagine peeling an orange and trying to lay the peel flat without tearing or overlapping. You can flatten parts, but not the whole surface perfectly. Map projections are controlled ways of doing that flattening so the map is useful for a particular purpose.

Distortion shows up in several measurable ways:

• Area distortion: equal-size regions on Earth appear different sizes on the map.
• Distance distortion: a measured map distance does not correspond to the same ground distance everywhere.
• Direction (bearing) distortion: the angle you measure on the map is not the true direction on Earth, except under certain conditions.
• Shape distortion: local shapes (like coastlines or city outlines) look stretched or squashed.

Many projections are designed to preserve one property well (or two approximately) while accepting distortion in others. The key skill is recognizing what a given map is “good at” and what it will mislead you about.

2) How meridians and parallels look on common map types (and what that implies)

Reading the grid: what you see vs. what it means

On a globe, meridians (lines of longitude) meet at the poles and parallels (lines of latitude) are circles that get smaller toward the poles. On flat maps, those same lines can appear straight, curved, evenly spaced, or unevenly spaced depending on the projection. The appearance of the grid is a clue to the distortion pattern.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

What distortions mean for distance, area, and direction

Distance: On many world maps, the “same” 1 cm on the map does not represent the same ground distance everywhere. Some projections keep distance accurate only along certain lines (for example, along the equator, a central meridian, or a set of standard parallels). Away from those lines, distance scale changes.

Area: If a projection preserves angles (conformal), it usually sacrifices area. If it preserves area (equal-area), it usually distorts shapes/angles. When comparing the size of countries, climate zones, or ocean basins, an equal-area map is the safer choice.

Direction: Some projections preserve local angles, which makes compass-like bearings drawn on the map meaningful locally. But “direction” can mean different things: direction from a point, direction along a path, or constant bearing. A map might preserve one of these well but not the others.

3) Scale: why measuring directly on some maps can mislead

Scale is not always uniform

Map scale is the relationship between a distance on the map and the corresponding distance on the ground. On many local maps, scale is close to constant across the sheet. On many world maps, scale varies by location and sometimes by direction (east–west vs. north–south).

Two practical consequences:

• A single scale bar may be “locally true” but not globally true. If the projection’s scale changes with latitude, the scale bar is only accurate along the line(s) where the map was designed to be accurate.
• Measuring a straight line on the map may not match the shortest route on Earth. On a sphere, the shortest path between two points is generally a great-circle route; on many projections, that route appears curved. Conversely, a straight line on a map might represent a path that is not shortest on Earth.

How to sanity-check measurements

• Check the map type and purpose. A city street map is designed for local accuracy; a decorative world map is designed for readability.
• Look for “standard lines” or hints. If the map is a regional conic map, it may be most accurate near one or two latitudes (standard parallels). If it’s an azimuthal map, it may be most accurate near the center.
• Compare east–west vs. north–south spacing of the grid. If parallels are increasingly spaced toward the poles, north–south scale is changing.

4) Practical activity: interpreting a world map vs. a local map for the same coordinates

This activity helps you see how the same latitude/longitude pair can “look” different depending on projection and scale.

Materials

• A world map view (any common web map or atlas-style world map)
• A local/regional map view (zoomed-in map of the same area)
• The same coordinate pair plotted on both maps (choose a point you can recognize, such as a major airport or city center)

Step-by-step

1. Plot the coordinate on the world map. Mark the point and note the surrounding grid: Are meridians straight or curved? Are parallels evenly spaced? Does the point sit near the center or toward the edge of the map?
2. Estimate a distance on the world map. Pick a second point (for example, another city) and draw a straight line between them on the map. Use the scale bar (if present) to estimate the distance.
3. Now plot the same coordinate on the local map. Zoom in until the map shows roads, neighborhoods, or terrain. Mark the same point and observe the grid (if shown): it may look more “regular,” and scale is often more consistent across the view.
4. Measure the same two-point distance on the local map. If the map has a measurement tool, use it; otherwise use the local scale bar. Compare with your world-map estimate.
5. Interpret the difference. Ask: Did the world map overestimate or underestimate? Is the discrepancy larger if the points are far apart or at higher latitudes? Does the straight line on the world map match the route suggested by the local map?
6. Check direction. On the world map, measure the angle of your line relative to north (visually or with a protractor overlay). On the local map, check the initial direction from the first point to the second. Note whether the direction appears to “change” when you zoom or switch projections.

What you should notice

• On a global view, the grid may look neat, but distance and area can be strongly distorted in some regions.
• On a local view, shapes and distances are typically more reliable for practical navigation, but you lose global context.
• The same coordinate is the same location, but the map’s geometry (grid shape and spacing) changes how you perceive proximity, size, and direction.

5) Choosing the right map view for navigation tasks

Match the map to the question

Different navigation and planning tasks prioritize different “truths.” Use the map view that preserves the property you care about most.

• Local navigation (walking/driving, city logistics): Prefer a local map projection/view where scale is nearly uniform across the area. This makes distances, turn angles, and shapes dependable for short-range decisions.
• Regional planning (state/province, wide east–west regions): A regional map designed for mid-latitudes often balances distortions well. Look for maps intended for that region rather than reusing a global projection.
• Global visualization (comparing continents, climate belts, distribution maps): Prefer an equal-area or “balanced” world map when comparing sizes and spatial distributions. Avoid relying on it for precise bearings or distances.
• Direction from a fixed point (radio coverage, flight planning from a hub, emergency response from a center): Consider an azimuthal view centered on the point of interest, because some variants preserve direction or distance from the center.

Quick decision guide

When in doubt, switch views: use a global map to understand overall position and relationships, then switch to a local map for measurement and navigation decisions.