HVAC Leak Detection Tools: Electronic Detectors, Nitrogen Pressure Testing, and Verification Methods

Leak Detection as a Multi-Method Process

Effective leak detection is a workflow, not a single tool. A reliable approach uses (1) a fast screening method (often an electronic detector), (2) a confirmation method (bubble solution, pressure decay, or other), and (3) a verification step after repair. This reduces false positives, prevents repeat callbacks, and supports accurate documentation.

(1) Leak Types and Typical Locations

Common leak types

• Mechanical joint leaks: movement, vibration, or improper torque causes small pathways at fittings and valve interfaces.
• Material defects and fatigue: pinholes, rub-through, corrosion, or stress cracking in tubing or coils.
• Seal and core leaks: elastomer seals age; Schrader cores loosen or are damaged by tools or debris.
• Manufacturing/installation issues: incomplete brazing, overheated joints, flux contamination, or poor flare formation.

High-probability locations to check first

• Service valves: stem packing, caps (cap gasket), and valve body joints.
• Flare fittings: indoor/outdoor unit connections, line set transitions, and any field-made flare.
• Brazed joints: filter-drier connections, distributor joints, service stubs, and any repaired section.
• Coils: U-bends, return bends, header connections, and areas with vibration contact or corrosion.
• Schrader cores: access ports on suction/liquid lines and on components (accumulators, receivers).

Practical tip: start with the most disturbed or recently serviced areas (ports used for service, replaced components, brazed repairs) before scanning the entire system.

(2) Electronic Leak Detector Types and Selection

Electronic detectors differ in sensing technology, selectivity, and how they behave in airflow and contaminated environments. Selection should be based on refrigerant type, required sensitivity, and jobsite conditions.

Heated diode (heated sensor) detectors

• How they work: a heated element reacts to halogenated refrigerant vapors, changing sensor output.
• Strengths: generally high sensitivity; common in field service.
• Limitations: more prone to false positives from certain vapors/chemicals; sensor can be contaminated by oil, solvents, or heavy moisture; may require more frequent sensor replacement.
• Best use: controlled indoor environments, close-up pinpointing after initial screening, or when high sensitivity is needed and interfering chemicals are minimal.

Infrared (IR) detectors

• How they work: measures absorption of infrared light by refrigerant molecules; often more selective to refrigerants.
• Strengths: stable readings, good resistance to sensor poisoning, typically fewer false alarms from non-refrigerant vapors.
• Limitations: can be affected by strong airflow dispersing the plume; may cost more.
• Best use: mixed environments (mechanical rooms, rooftops) where cleaners/solvents may be present; longer service intervals.

Ultrasonic detectors

• How they work: detects high-frequency sound produced by gas escaping under pressure.
• Strengths: can find leaks without relying on refrigerant chemistry; useful when system is pressurized with dry nitrogen; can help locate larger leaks quickly.
• Limitations: background noise (fans, wind, compressors) can mask signal; less effective for very small leaks or when pressure differential is low.
• Best use: pressure testing with nitrogen, noisy industrial settings (with good technique), and locating leaks where electronic refrigerant sensors struggle.

Selection checklist

Always verify the detector is rated for the refrigerant family you are working with and that it meets the sensitivity needed for the expected leak size.

(3) Correct Electronic Detector Use

Step-by-step technique

1. Prepare the area: reduce airflow if possible (turn off nearby fans when safe/allowed, close panels, shield with your body). Avoid spraying chemicals nearby during testing.
2. Warm-up and self-check: power on and allow full warm-up. Confirm battery level. Perform the instrument’s built-in self-test if available.
3. Zero/baseline correctly: let the detector establish a baseline in clean air. Do not “zero” directly in a suspected leak plume or you may mask the leak.
4. Set sensitivity: start at a lower sensitivity for initial scanning to avoid constant alarms, then increase sensitivity for pinpointing.
5. Probe positioning: keep the probe tip close to the surface (typically within a few millimeters) without touching oil or wet surfaces.
6. Probe speed: move slowly—about 1–2 inches per second (25–50 mm/s). Fast sweeping misses small leaks.
7. Scan pattern: trace around likely leak points: valve stems/caps, flare nuts, braze fillets, coil headers, and Schrader cores. Use a consistent pattern (clockwise around a joint).
8. Account for airflow and buoyancy: refrigerant plumes can be pulled by fans or drafts. Scan downwind and then work back to the source. For some refrigerants, plume behavior may vary with temperature and mixing; assume airflow dominates.
9. Pinpoint: once you get a response, back away to clean air, re-approach from a different direction, and reduce sensitivity if the alarm saturates.
10. Confirm with a second method: do not repair based only on an electronic alarm when conditions are noisy or contaminated.

Avoiding false positives

• Chemicals and vapors: some cleaners, solvents, and aerosols can trigger heated diode sensors. Keep the probe away from fresh chemical residue and allow surfaces to dry.
• Oil contamination: compressor oil film can trap refrigerant and release it slowly, creating a “ghost” leak. Clean the area and re-test after a short wait.
• Moisture and condensation: wet probe tips and condensation can cause unstable readings. Keep the tip dry; use a clean, dry cloth if needed.
• Baseline errors: if you zero in contaminated air, the detector may ignore the leak. Re-zero in known clean air.

(4) Complementary Methods

Soap solution / bubble testing

Bubble testing is a direct visual confirmation method and is excellent for pinpointing at accessible joints.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

1. Choose an appropriate solution: use a leak detection bubble solution designed for refrigeration/HVAC; avoid household soaps that may corrode or leave residues.
2. Apply to the suspected point: coat the entire circumference of the joint, valve cap, or core area.
3. Observe: look for growing bubbles or foam expansion. Tiny leaks may form slow-growing bubbles—watch long enough.
4. Clean after test: wipe off residue to prevent corrosion and to keep future electronic tests clean.

UV dye (where permitted)

UV dye can help find intermittent or hard-to-access leaks, but it must be allowed by equipment manufacturer and local policy. Dye is not a substitute for proper repair verification.

• Use only approved dye compatible with the system oil/refrigerant.
• Allow circulation time so dye reaches the leak point.
• Inspect with UV light and appropriate glasses; confirm suspicious dye traces with another method when possible.
• Be disciplined: dye can spread from handling and create misleading traces if the area is not cleaned.

Standing pressure tests with dry nitrogen

Dry nitrogen pressure testing is a key verification tool for confirming tightness after repair and for checking systems that cannot be reliably checked with refrigerant-based sniffing alone.

• Purpose: prove the system holds pressure (no measurable decay) and support pinpointing with bubbles or ultrasonic methods.
• Gas: use dry nitrogen only. Do not use oxygen or compressed air for pressure testing.
• Stabilization: allow temperature to stabilize after pressurization; pressure changes with temperature can mimic leaks.
• Leak pinpointing: once pressurized, use bubble solution at suspected joints and/or ultrasonic detection to locate escaping gas.

Record starting pressure, ambient temperature, and elapsed time. If pressure drops after stabilization, treat it as a leak indicator and locate the leak before proceeding.

(5) Verification Workflow: Detect → Confirm → Repair → Retest → Document

Workflow steps

1. Detect (screen): use an electronic detector to quickly identify suspect areas. Mark locations (tag, paint marker, or note).
2. Confirm (pinpoint): use bubble solution at the exact joint/point, or use ultrasonic during nitrogen pressure testing. Confirmation should identify the specific component or interface.
3. Repair: perform the appropriate repair (tighten to spec, replace Schrader core, re-flare, re-braze, replace component). Keep the area clean to avoid re-contamination.
4. Retest: repeat the confirmation method and re-scan with the electronic detector. For critical repairs, perform a standing nitrogen pressure test to verify tightness.
5. Document: record leak location, method(s) used, test conditions (pressure/temperature/time), repair performed, and retest results.

Example documentation table

(6) Common Mistakes and How to Prevent Them

• Searching in windy conditions without controlling airflow: wind disperses the plume and causes missed leaks. Shield the area, reduce fan operation when safe, and scan downwind-to-source.
• Skipping the nitrogen pressure test after repair: relying only on a sniffer can miss slow leaks or be fooled by residual refrigerant. Use a standing pressure test when practical, especially after brazing or component replacement.
• Contaminating the probe tip: touching oily joints, wet insulation, or bubble solution can cause lingering alarms. Keep the tip off surfaces; clean/replace filters per manufacturer guidance.
• Mistaking cleaning chemicals for leaks: solvents and aerosols can trigger sensors. Stop spraying, ventilate, re-zero in clean air, and confirm with bubbles or nitrogen/ultrasonic.
• Moving the probe too fast: fast sweeping misses small leaks. Use a deliberate scan speed and repeat passes from multiple directions.
• Zeroing in the leak plume: the detector adapts and may ignore the leak. Always baseline in clean air.

Lab-Style Exercise: Controlled Leak, Detector Technique, Bubble Confirmation, Documentation

Objective

Practice a repeatable leak detection workflow using an electronic detector for screening, bubble solution for confirmation, and structured documentation.

Equipment and materials

• Training rig or sealed test assembly with service port and fittings (flare and/or brazed sample joints)
• Dry nitrogen cylinder with regulator rated for the intended pressures
• Bubble leak detection solution
• Electronic leak detector (heated diode or IR) and, if available, an ultrasonic detector
• Wrenches/torque tools as applicable, replacement Schrader cores and caps (training parts)
• Marker/tags, inspection mirror, flashlight
• Data sheet (paper or digital) for recording results

Safety and setup notes

• Use only dry nitrogen for pressurization. Verify regulator condition and connections.
• Pressurize within the training rig’s rated limits and your organization’s procedures.
• Ensure the area is ventilated and free of unnecessary chemical vapors during detector practice.

Exercise Part A — Create a controlled leak

1. Assemble the test section: include at least two potential leak points (e.g., a flare fitting and a Schrader core).
2. Introduce a small leak (instructor-controlled): slightly loosen one flare nut or install a Schrader core that is intentionally not fully seated. Keep the leak small enough to require good technique.
3. Pressurize with nitrogen: bring the assembly to the assigned training pressure. Allow a short stabilization period so temperature effects settle.
4. Do not disclose the leak location to the student performing the search.

Exercise Part B — Electronic detector screening technique

1. Warm-up and baseline the detector in clean air.
2. Initial scan: set sensitivity to low/medium and scan all typical locations in a consistent order: service valve/cap area, flare joints, brazed joints, coil/header sample (if present), Schrader cores.
3. Mark suspect areas: when the detector responds, mark the location and note the detector setting and approach direction.
4. Pinpoint: increase sensitivity only after narrowing the area. Repeat approach from at least two directions to confirm repeatability.

Exercise Part C — Confirm with bubble solution

1. Apply bubble solution to the marked suspect point(s), fully coating the joint circumference or core area.
2. Observe for growth: watch long enough to see consistent bubble formation (not just surface foaming).
3. Record confirmation: note whether bubbles formed, how quickly, and the exact component/interface.

Exercise Part D — Repair and retest

1. Perform the repair: tighten/re-make flare, reseat/replace Schrader core, or rework the joint per training instructions.
2. Reconfirm with bubbles: verify no bubble growth at the repaired point.
3. Retest with electronic detector: re-baseline in clean air and re-scan the repaired area and adjacent joints to ensure no secondary leaks were missed.
4. Standing pressure check: record pressure and ambient temperature, wait the assigned time, and record final pressure/temperature. Interpret results only after stabilization.

Exercise Part E — Documentation (required fields)

Technician: ____________________   Date/Time: ____________________
Test assembly ID: ______________  Ambient temp: _________________

Screening method (detector type/model): __________________________
Warm-up complete?  Y/N   Baseline location: _____________________
Sensitivity setting(s): _________________________________________

Suspect locations marked:
1) __________________________  Detector response: ________________
2) __________________________  Detector response: ________________

Confirmation method: Bubble solution
Confirmed leak point: ___________________________________________
Observation (bubble size/growth/time): __________________________

Repair performed: _______________________________________________

Retest results:
- Bubble test after repair: Pass/Fail
- Electronic detector after repair: Pass/Fail
- Nitrogen standing test: Start ____ psi @ ____°; End ____ psi @ ____°; Time ____
Notes (airflow/chemicals/noise factors): _________________________