Heat Transfer Pathways: Conduction, Convection, and Radiation in Builds and Repairs

Why heat-transfer pathways matter in builds and repairs

In maker projects and repair work, “heat problems” rarely come from a single cause. A motor overheats because heat cannot leave the windings fast enough. A 3D printer struggles with bed temperature because heat escapes through the frame and air. An electronics enclosure fails because sunlight adds radiation load while convection is blocked by dust. To fix these issues reliably, treat heat flow like current in a circuit: it follows pathways, it meets resistances, and it can be redirected with better materials, geometry, and airflow.

This chapter focuses on the three pathways by which heat moves: conduction (through solids and still fluids), convection (through moving fluids), and radiation (electromagnetic exchange between surfaces). In real builds, they act simultaneously. Your job is to identify the dominant pathway for the situation and then modify the pathway with practical interventions.

Conduction in builds: moving heat through solids

What conduction looks like on the bench

Conduction is heat transfer through a material due to a temperature gradient. In repairs, conduction is why a heatsink works, why a soldering iron tip transfers heat into a joint, and why a metal chassis can spread heat away from a hotspot. Conduction is also why a steel bolt can become a “thermal short” that leaks heat out of an insulated box.

For a flat layer, the basic design idea is: thicker and less conductive means less heat flow; thinner and more conductive means more heat flow. You do not need advanced math to use this: you compare materials and thicknesses and decide whether you want to encourage heat flow (cooling) or block it (insulation).

Common conduction bottlenecks: interfaces and contact pressure

In maker hardware, the biggest conduction problem is often not the bulk material but the interface between two parts. Two “flat” surfaces touch at microscopic high points, leaving air gaps. Air is a poor conductor, so the interface becomes a thermal bottleneck. This is why thermal paste, pads, and proper mounting pressure matter so much in electronics and LED builds.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• Thermal paste fills microscopic voids; it is not meant to be a thick layer. Too much paste can increase the effective thickness and reduce performance.
• Thermal pads are useful when surfaces are not flat or when you need electrical isolation. They usually conduct worse than paste but can be more reliable mechanically.
• Mounting pressure improves contact by deforming asperities and squeezing out excess paste. Uneven pressure can create hotspots.
• Surface flatness matters: a warped heatsink base can make a great material perform poorly.

Step-by-step: improving conduction from a hot component to a heatsink

This procedure applies to power transistors, regulators, high-power LEDs, and CPU-like modules in DIY enclosures.

• 1) Identify the heat source footprint. Measure the contact area between the component and the heatsink or chassis. Small area means high heat flux, which makes interface quality more critical.
• 2) Inspect surfaces. Look for burrs, anodizing where you need contact, paint, adhesive residue, or warping. Clean with isopropyl alcohol. Remove paint only where needed; keep corrosion protection elsewhere.
• 3) Choose interface material. Use paste for metal-to-metal contact when electrical isolation is not required. Use a pad or mica+paste when isolation is required. Check pad thickness: too thick increases thermal resistance.
• 4) Apply correctly. Paste: a thin, even film or a small dot that spreads under pressure. Pad: ensure full coverage without wrinkles or trapped debris.
• 5) Clamp evenly. Use the recommended torque if available; otherwise tighten gradually in alternating steps. Avoid bending the PCB or cracking ceramic packages.
• 6) Verify with a quick thermal test. Run the device at a known load for a fixed time and measure temperatures at the component case and heatsink base. A large temperature difference between case and sink suggests interface issues.

Thermal spreading and “heat highways”

Even with good contact, heat must spread through the heatsink or chassis. Thick aluminum plates spread heat better than thin ones; copper spreads better than aluminum but is heavier and more expensive. In 3D-printed assemblies, a common mistake is mounting a hot part to a small metal insert surrounded by plastic: the insert gets hot, but the heat cannot spread, so temperatures rise quickly.

• Use metal as a heat spreader when you need to move heat laterally before rejecting it to air.
• Avoid narrow necks in metal brackets that connect a hot part to a larger plate; the neck becomes a conduction choke point.
• Watch for unintended heat paths such as metal standoffs that conduct heat into temperature-sensitive parts (batteries, sensors, plastics).

Conduction as a problem: thermal bridges in insulated builds

When you are trying to keep something warm or cold (heated chamber, insulated fermenter, cooler box, battery pack in winter), conduction through fasteners and frames can dominate losses. A single metal bolt that connects inside to outside can bypass foam insulation.

• Break the bridge with plastic spacers, nylon bolts, or a thermal break section (a short low-conductivity segment) where structural loads allow.
• Increase path length by using longer, thinner metal sections rather than short, thick ones.
• Isolate mounting points by embedding threaded inserts only on one side of the insulation and using straps or external brackets instead of through-bolts.

Convection: heat transfer by moving air or liquid

Natural vs forced convection in real enclosures

Convection happens when a fluid moves and carries heat. In natural convection, buoyancy drives the flow: warm air rises, cool air falls. In forced convection, a fan or pump drives flow. Many maker devices rely on natural convection unintentionally, and that is risky because small changes (dust, orientation, nearby walls) can drastically reduce airflow.

Key practical idea: convection performance depends strongly on flow path. A powerful fan does little if air short-circuits around the heatsink instead of through it, or if the enclosure has no clear inlet and outlet.

Step-by-step: diagnosing convection problems in a box-shaped build

• 1) Map the heat sources. Identify which parts generate heat and where they sit relative to vents. Hot air wants to rise; place exhaust high when possible.
• 2) Check for a complete airflow path. You need an inlet and an outlet. If both are on the same side and close together, air may recirculate locally.
• 3) Look for obstructions. Cables, foam, filters, and crowded PCBs can block flow. A filter that is great for dust can be terrible for airflow if undersized.
• 4) Identify short-circuiting. With a fan, air may take the easiest route and bypass the hot components. Use simple baffles (thin plastic or sheet metal) to force air through the hot zone.
• 5) Validate with smoke or tissue tests. A small incense stick (used carefully) or a strip of tissue near vents can reveal flow direction and dead zones.
• 6) Measure before and after. Record component temperatures at a fixed ambient temperature and load. Convection fixes should show a clear reduction in steady-state temperature.

Fan selection and placement: what matters most

For small enclosures, the most important fan specs are not just airflow (CFM) but static pressure (ability to push through restrictions). Dense heatsinks, filters, and narrow vents require higher static pressure. A fan with high free-air CFM can underperform when faced with real resistance.

• Push vs pull: pushing air into a heatsink or pulling through it can both work. What matters is sealing the flow so it goes through fins rather than around them.
• Recirculation avoidance: keep inlet and outlet separated so hot exhaust does not get pulled back in.
• Orientation: align natural convection with forced flow when possible (bottom-to-top flow in a vertical enclosure).
• Noise vs cooling: doubling fan speed often increases noise dramatically; improving ducting and reducing restrictions can yield better cooling with less noise.

Heatsink fin orientation and boundary layers

Fins work by increasing surface area, but they need airflow between them. In natural convection, vertical fins usually perform better because they support upward flow. In forced convection, fin spacing matters: too tight and the fan cannot push air through; too wide and you lose surface area. Dust buildup effectively narrows fin spacing over time, turning a good heatsink into a poor one.

• Maintenance tip: in dusty environments, prefer heatsinks with accessible fin spacing and add a removable filter that is easy to clean, sized generously to reduce pressure drop.
• Repair tip: if a device overheats after months of use, inspect for lint mats on intake grills and heatsink faces; cleaning can restore convection performance immediately.

Liquid convection: coolant loops and water blocks

In maker cooling loops (laser tubes, spindle motors, high-power LEDs, PC-style water cooling), convection is driven by a pump. The dominant issues are flow rate, trapped air, and radiator airflow. A water block can have excellent conduction from the device into the coolant, but if the radiator cannot reject heat to air, the whole loop warms up.

• Bleeding air: trapped bubbles reduce effective contact area and can stop flow in high points. Design fill and bleed points at the top of the loop.
• Hose routing: avoid kinks and sharp bends that increase resistance.
• Radiator placement: ensure the radiator sees cool intake air, not preheated exhaust from other components.

Radiation: the invisible heat exchange between surfaces

When radiation matters in maker projects

Radiation is heat transfer via electromagnetic waves, primarily infrared at typical device temperatures. Radiation becomes important when surfaces “see” each other across an air gap (no solid contact) and when temperatures are high or surface areas are large. In many builds, radiation is not the largest pathway at modest temperatures, but it can be the difference between stable and overheating when convection is limited (sealed enclosures) or when parts run hot (heaters, exhaust components, high-power resistors).

Radiation depends strongly on surface properties. Matte black surfaces generally emit and absorb radiation well; shiny metals emit and absorb poorly. This can be used either to shed heat (high emissivity surfaces) or to shield sensitive parts (low emissivity barriers).

Practical radiation control: shields, spacing, and surface finish

• Heat shields: a thin reflective sheet placed between a hot part and a sensitive part can reduce radiative heating dramatically. The shield works best with an air gap on both sides.
• Increase spacing: radiative exchange drops as the “view” between surfaces decreases. Even small repositioning can help if it reduces direct line-of-sight.
• Surface finish choices: painting a heatsink matte black can increase radiative heat loss in still air, but it can also slightly reduce convective performance if the paint fills fin microtexture or adds thickness. Use thin coatings and prioritize convection improvements first when airflow exists.
• Foil tape: aluminum foil tape can act as a reflective barrier, but ensure adhesive temperature ratings are adequate and consider fire safety near heaters.

Step-by-step: adding a radiation shield near a hot component

• 1) Identify line-of-sight heating. Look for a hot surface facing a temperature-sensitive part across a gap (plastic housing, wiring insulation, battery pack, sensor).
• 2) Choose shield material. Thin aluminum or stainless sheet works well. For electrical safety, ensure it cannot short exposed conductors; add insulating standoffs if needed.
• 3) Create air gaps. Mount the shield so it does not touch the hot part or the protected part. Direct contact turns the shield into a conduction path, which can defeat the purpose.
• 4) Provide a vent path. A shield can trap hot air; add openings or ensure convection can carry heat away from the shield.
• 5) Validate. Measure the protected part temperature before and after at the same operating condition. If the shield gets very hot, consider adding airflow or increasing shield area.

Combining pathways: thinking in thermal circuits

Series and parallel heat paths in real hardware

Heat often has multiple routes to leave a component. Some are in series (must pass through each step), and some are in parallel (multiple exits). For example, a power resistor on a PCB may lose heat by conduction into copper traces and mounting hardware, by convection to air, and by radiation to nearby walls. Improving one path helps most when that path is a major bottleneck.

A useful maker mindset is to sketch a “thermal circuit”:

• Node: the hot component.
• Resistances: interface to heatsink, heatsink to air, enclosure wall to ambient, etc.
• Parallel branches: multiple ways heat can escape (through a bracket, through airflow, through a shielded opening).

This sketch helps you avoid fixes that move the bottleneck rather than removing it. For instance, adding a bigger heatsink (better convection area) will not help much if the interface is poor (conduction bottleneck). Conversely, perfect paste and mounting will not help if the heatsink sits in stagnant air inside a sealed box (convection bottleneck).

Example: fixing an overheating linear regulator in a small enclosure

• Symptoms: regulator shuts down after several minutes; enclosure feels warm; no fan.
• Likely pathways: conduction from regulator to PCB copper, then convection/radiation from PCB to air, then conduction through enclosure walls to ambient.
• Practical fixes: increase copper area (add a copper pour or solder a copper “coin”/shim), add a small aluminum spreader plate to the regulator tab, create vents high and low for natural convection, or add a small fan if power budget allows.
• Common mistake: adding a tiny stick-on heatsink inside a sealed box; it increases surface area but still relies on stagnant air, so gains are limited.

Example: keeping a heated chamber stable without wasting power

• Goal: maintain elevated temperature with minimal loss.
• Conduction control: reduce thermal bridges through frame members and fasteners; add thermal breaks at mounting points.
• Convection control: seal unintended leaks; if you need air exchange, use controlled vents with baffles.
• Radiation control: add reflective inner surfaces if you want to reduce radiative loss to the outer shell, but ensure materials tolerate temperature and do not create fire hazards near heaters.

Measurement techniques that reveal pathways (without repeating basic temperature theory)

Using temperature patterns to infer conduction vs convection

Different pathways leave different “signatures.” A conduction bottleneck often shows a steep temperature drop across an interface (hot device case, much cooler heatsink base). A convection bottleneck often shows the entire heatsink or internal air volume running hot with relatively small gradients, because heat reaches the sink but cannot leave to ambient effectively.

• Touch-safe checks: use an IR thermometer cautiously (surface emissivity can mislead) and confirm with a contact probe on critical points.
• Gradient mapping: measure multiple points: heat source, interface, heatsink base, heatsink fins, internal air, enclosure wall, outside air.

IR camera and emissivity pitfalls in repairs

IR cameras are excellent for spotting hotspots and airflow dead zones, but shiny metals can appear cooler than they are because they reflect surrounding radiation. A practical trick is to place a small piece of matte black tape on the surface and measure that spot instead, treating it as a more reliable indicator of surface temperature.

• Use reference patches: matte tape or paint dots at measurement points.
• Compare relative changes: even if absolute readings are off, before/after comparisons under the same setup are valuable.

Design and repair checklist by pathway

Conduction checklist

• Is there a clean, flat, well-pressed interface between hot part and spreader/heatsink?
• Is the interface material appropriate (paste vs pad vs insulator)?
• Is there enough metal cross-section for heat to spread, or is there a narrow choke point?
• Are there unintended thermal bridges leaking heat where you want insulation?

Convection checklist

• Is there a clear inlet and outlet with separation to prevent recirculation?
• Are fins oriented to support the expected airflow (natural or forced)?
• Is the fan matched to restriction (static pressure) and is airflow sealed through the hot zone?
• Are filters and grills sized to reduce pressure drop and easy to clean?

Radiation checklist

• Do hot parts have direct line-of-sight to sensitive parts across gaps?
• Would a reflective shield with air gaps reduce heating?
• Are surface finishes helping or hurting (shiny barrier vs high-emissivity radiator)?
• Are materials and adhesives rated for the temperatures involved?

Quick reference: typical maker interventions

Problem: Hotspot on a power device despite a heatsink
Likely bottleneck: Conduction at interface
Fixes: Clean surfaces, thin paste, proper torque, flatter base, better pad choice

Problem: Whole enclosure runs hot; heatsink is hot everywhere
Likely bottleneck: Convection to ambient
Fixes: Add vents, baffles, higher static-pressure fan, reduce restrictions, separate inlet/outlet

Problem: Nearby plastic softens though it doesn't touch the heater
Likely bottleneck: Radiation line-of-sight
Fixes: Add reflective shield with air gaps, increase spacing, reroute sensitive parts

Problem: Insulated box loses heat quickly at mounting points
Likely bottleneck: Conduction thermal bridges
Fixes: Nylon hardware, thermal breaks, isolate fasteners, redesign supports