Great-Circle Thinking: The Shortest Path on a Sphere and Why Routes Curve on Maps

Navigation on a Sphere: Why “Straight” Depends on the Surface

When you navigate on Earth, you are moving across a curved surface. On a flat sheet of paper, the shortest path between two points is a straight line. On a sphere, the shortest surface path is different: it follows a great-circle route. This difference is why long-distance routes (ships, aircraft, even some radio paths) can look “bent” when drawn on many common maps.

(1) Great-circle routes vs. straight lines on a flat map

Great circle: a circle on the sphere whose center is the same as the sphere’s center. The equator is a great circle; any meridian paired with its opposite meridian forms a great circle. The great-circle route between two points is the shorter arc of the great circle passing through them.

Rhumb line (loxodrome): a path that crosses all meridians at the same angle (constant compass bearing). On a Mercator map, rhumb lines plot as straight lines, which is why they are visually tempting for “draw a line and follow it” navigation. But on the globe, a rhumb line is generally longer than the great-circle route for long distances (except special cases like due east/west along the equator or due north/south along a meridian).

• On the globe: shortest surface path = great-circle arc.
• On a Mercator map: straight line = rhumb line (constant bearing), not usually the shortest distance.
• On many other projections: neither great circles nor rhumb lines stay straight; the map’s geometry decides what “looks straight.”

(2) Why the shortest route can appear curved on common projections

A map projection converts curved-surface geometry into flat geometry. That conversion cannot preserve all properties at once (shape, area, distance, direction). As a result, a path that is “geodesic” (shortest) on the sphere will often plot as a curve on a flat map.

Two useful mental anchors:

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• Great circles look straight only on certain projections (for example, on a gnomonic projection, every great circle is a straight line). Most classroom and web maps are not gnomonic.
• Mercator specifically makes rhumb lines straight, which is great for constant-bearing navigation but visually hides that the shortest path is different.

So when you see a long route that “bows” toward higher latitudes on a typical world map, that does not mean the plane is detouring. It often means the map is distorting the true shortest path.

(3) Quick tools: when do great-circle effects matter?

You do not need heavy math to decide whether great-circle thinking is important. Use these conceptual checks:

Tool A: Distance scale check (short vs. long)

• Short trips (city-to-city, a few hundred kilometers): Earth’s curvature is small relative to the route; straight lines on many maps are “good enough” for intuition.
• Medium trips (1,000–3,000 km): differences start to be noticeable, especially at higher latitudes.
• Long trips (intercontinental): great-circle vs. “straight-on-map” can differ by hundreds of kilometers; the plotted path may look strongly curved.

Tool B: Latitude check (high latitudes amplify the visual curve)

Routes involving high latitudes tend to show more dramatic curvature on common world maps. A great-circle route between two mid-latitude points can arc poleward, because going “over the top” can be shorter than staying at lower latitudes.

Tool C: Same-latitude trap

Two cities can share approximately the same latitude. On a globe, the shortest path between them is not generally the parallel of latitude (unless it is the equator). The great-circle route will usually depart from that latitude and arc toward a pole.

Tool D: Constant bearing vs. changing bearing

If you tried to follow a great-circle route with a simple compass, your bearing would generally change continuously along the way (except along a meridian or the equator). If you want a single constant bearing, you are choosing a rhumb line, which is typically longer for long distances.

(4) Worked comparisons: “straight on the map” vs. plausible great-circle arc

The goal here is not to compute exact distances, but to learn how to reason about the shape of the shortest path and what you should expect to see on a map.

Example 1: Two mid-latitude cities across an ocean

Scenario: You draw a straight line on a Mercator world map between two mid-latitude cities on opposite sides of an ocean. The line looks fairly horizontal, staying near the same latitude.

What that straight line means on Mercator: it approximates a rhumb line—constant compass bearing.

Great-circle expectation (step-by-step reasoning):

1. Locate both cities’ latitudes (roughly). If both are well north of the equator, expect the great-circle to potentially arc even farther north.
2. Imagine the globe: connect the two points with a taut string on the surface. The string will often “lift” toward higher latitudes rather than hugging the parallel.
3. Translate back to the map: on Mercator, that poleward arc will appear as a curve that bows toward the pole.
4. Interpretation: the curved line is often shorter than the straight Mercator line, even though it looks longer visually.

Practical takeaway: if your straight drawn line stays near a constant latitude and spans a large longitude range, suspect it is not the shortest route unless it is near the equator.

Example 2: “Same latitude” endpoints

Scenario: Two cities are both near 40°N. On a rectangular map, it feels natural to connect them with a line that stays around 40°N.

Great-circle expectation (step-by-step reasoning):

1. Ask: is this latitude the equator? If not, the parallel is a smaller circle than a great circle.
2. Shortest path prefers great circles, so it will generally leave 40°N and arc poleward.
3. On many projections, that arc will appear curved; on Mercator it often bows northward.

Practical takeaway: “same latitude” does not imply “go due east/west all the way” if you want the shortest distance.

Example 3: When the “straight map line” and great circle nearly match

Scenario: Two points are close together, or the route is near the equator, or the route is nearly north–south.

Reasoning:

• Short distance: sphere locally resembles a plane, so differences shrink.
• Near equator: the equator is a great circle, so due east/west along it is both a great-circle and a constant-latitude path.
• Near a meridian: traveling nearly north–south aligns with a great circle (a meridian), so “straight” intuition is more reliable.

(5) Applied mini-case: reading a long-haul flight path with latitude/longitude

Situation: You look at an in-flight map or a flight-tracking website. The route between two cities looks like it curves toward higher latitudes, sometimes passing near places you did not expect. You want to interpret that using spherical geometry and coordinate thinking (without re-deriving coordinate basics).

Step-by-step interpretation checklist

1. Note the endpoints’ approximate latitudes. If both are in the mid-to-high latitudes of the same hemisphere, a poleward-bowing great-circle is common.
2. Check the longitude separation. Large east–west separation increases the chance that the shortest path arcs noticeably.
3. Recognize that the great-circle route changes heading. A flight may start with a northeast heading, later become more easterly, and then southeast—this is consistent with following a great circle.
4. Separate “map appearance” from “ground truth”. The curve you see depends on the map projection used in the display. A different projection could make the same route look straighter or more curved.
5. Relate the arc to latitude/longitude lines. If the displayed path crosses meridians at changing angles, that visually matches a great-circle behavior (bearing changes). If it crosses meridians at a constant angle, that suggests a rhumb-line depiction.

A concrete mental model using a globe

If you have access to a physical globe (or a virtual globe), try this:

1. Mark the departure and arrival points.
2. Stretch a string (or imagine a tight band) between them along the surface.
3. Observe where the string passes relative to lines of latitude: it often reaches a higher maximum latitude than either endpoint for many intercontinental pairs.
4. Now look back at a flat map: the same path may look like a dramatic curve, even though on the globe it is the most direct surface route.

Why flights sometimes deviate from the pure great circle

Even when the great-circle path is the shortest, real routes can differ due to winds (jet streams), restricted airspace, preferred airways, and operational constraints. The key point is that a route can still look “curved” primarily because of spherical geometry and projection effects, even when it is close to the distance-minimizing path.