Fusion: Light Nuclei, Conditions, and Energy Considerations

What Fusion Is (and What “Energy Release” Means)

Fusion is a nuclear reaction in which two light nuclei combine to form a nucleus that is, overall, more tightly bound. The key physics statement is: if the final nucleus has a higher binding energy per nucleon than the initial nuclei, the difference appears as released energy, carried away as kinetic energy of reaction products and sometimes as radiation.

In practice, the most discussed fusion reactions involve hydrogen isotopes because they have relatively large energy release and comparatively favorable reaction probabilities at achievable conditions.

Here D is deuterium (hydrogen-2) and T is tritium (hydrogen-3). The “MeV” scale is per reaction event; converting that microscopic energy into macroscopic power requires an enormous number of reactions per second.

The Coulomb Barrier: Why Fusion Is Hard Even When It Is Energetically Favorable

Two nuclei are both positively charged, so they repel each other electrically. This repulsion creates an energy barrier (the Coulomb barrier) that must be overcome (or tunneled through) for the nuclei to get close enough for the short-range nuclear force to bind them together.

Conceptual picture

• Far apart: the interaction is dominated by electrostatic repulsion; potential energy rises as they approach.
• Very close (a few femtometers): the attractive nuclear force becomes strong and can “capture” the nuclei into a bound configuration.
• Barrier height depends on charge: higher-Z nuclei repel more strongly, which is why fusing heavier elements requires much more extreme conditions than fusing hydrogen isotopes.

Why temperature matters

In a hot plasma, nuclei have a distribution of kinetic energies. Higher temperature means a larger fraction of nuclei have enough kinetic energy to approach closely, increasing the fusion rate. Importantly, fusion in reactors relies heavily on quantum tunneling: even if a nucleus does not have enough energy to classically climb over the barrier, there is a probability to tunnel through it. Higher temperature still helps because tunneling probability increases rapidly with energy.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Why density and confinement time matter

Fusion requires collisions. The collision rate increases with particle density, and the total number of fusion events depends on how long the plasma stays hot and dense enough. This leads to the practical requirement that a plasma must satisfy a combined condition involving:

• Temperature (to make reactions probable),
• Density (to make collisions frequent),
• Confinement time (to allow enough reactions before the plasma cools or escapes).

A common conceptual summary is that you need “hot enough, dense enough, long enough.” Different approaches emphasize different parts of this triad: magnetic confinement aims for longer confinement at moderate density, while inertial confinement aims for extremely high density for a very short time.

Step-by-Step: From Plasma Conditions to Fusion Power (Conceptual Workflow)

The details of engineering vary, but the physics logic of producing useful fusion power can be described in a sequence:

1. Choose a fuel with favorable reaction properties. For near-term concepts, D–T is favored because it has a relatively high reaction probability at lower temperatures than most alternatives.

2. Ionize and heat the fuel into a plasma. Electrons are stripped from nuclei; heating raises the average kinetic energy and increases the high-energy tail of the distribution that contributes strongly to fusion.

3. Confine the plasma. Magnetic fields can guide charged particles and reduce losses to walls; inertial methods compress fuel rapidly so it fuses before it disassembles.

4. Achieve a fusion rate high enough that heating from fusion products can help sustain temperature. In D–T, the alpha particle is charged and can deposit energy back into the plasma, while the neutron escapes and carries energy outward.

5. Extract energy. Escaping neutrons deposit energy in surrounding material (a “blanket”), heating it. That heat can then be converted to electricity using conventional thermal cycles. (This is a physics point: the nuclear reaction produces energetic particles; the plant produces electricity by turning that energy into heat and then work.)

6. Manage fuel cycle and materials constraints. For D–T, tritium is scarce and must be bred from lithium in the blanket using neutrons; materials must tolerate neutron damage and heat loads.

Fusion vs Fission: Conceptual Physics Comparison

Both processes can produce large energy per unit mass compared with chemical reactions, but they present different physics bottlenecks: fusion is limited by reaction probability under achievable plasma conditions, while fission is limited by neutron balance, criticality, and managing radioactive products.

Why Fusion Releases Energy: Connection to the Binding Energy Curve

Fusion energy release is tied to how binding energy per nucleon varies with mass number. Light nuclei are generally less tightly bound per nucleon than medium-mass nuclei. When two light nuclei fuse into a nucleus closer to the “more tightly bound” region, the total binding energy increases. Because total mass-energy must be conserved, an increase in binding energy corresponds to a decrease in rest mass of the final products compared with the initial reactants; the difference appears as kinetic energy and radiation.

This also explains a key boundary: fusing nuclei much heavier than the most tightly bound region is not energetically favorable in the same way. The binding energy curve provides the conceptual rule: fusion of light nuclei tends to release energy; fission of very heavy nuclei tends to release energy.

Energy per reaction vs energy per kilogram

Fusion reactions release energy on the order of MeV per event. That sounds small until you remember that 1 kg of fuel contains an enormous number of nuclei. A useful conversion is:

1 eV = 1.602×10^-19 J  →  1 MeV = 1.602×10^-13 J

So a 17.6 MeV D–T reaction releases about:

Q ≈ 17.6 MeV × 1.602×10^-13 J/MeV ≈ 2.82×10^-12 J per reaction

Macroscopic power requires a reaction rate:

P = (reactions per second) × (energy per reaction)

For example, 1 GW of thermal power would require roughly:

reactions/s ≈ 10^9 J/s ÷ 2.82×10^-12 J ≈ 3.5×10^20 reactions/s

This is why confinement and density are central: you need an astronomically large number of successful fusion events every second.

Practical Constraints That Link Physics to Power Generation

Reaction rate is not just “energy per reaction”

Two fuels can have similar MeV-scale Q-values but very different practicality because the fusion cross-section (reaction probability) depends strongly on temperature and on the charges of the reacting nuclei. A reaction with a high Q-value but a very low probability at achievable temperatures may produce less power than a lower-Q reaction with a much higher rate.

Where the energy goes affects how you harvest it

• Neutron-rich reactions (e.g., D–T): neutrons escape magnetic fields and deposit energy in surrounding structures. This is good for extracting heat but creates material damage and activation.
• Mostly charged-particle reactions (often proposed as “aneutronic”): in principle, charged products could be directed or converted more directly, but achieving sufficient reaction rates is typically harder because of higher Coulomb barriers or lower cross-sections at accessible temperatures.

Power density and heat removal

Even if the plasma produces net energy, the system must remove heat without destroying materials. High power density means intense heat fluxes and neutron damage rates. These are not “extra engineering details”; they are direct consequences of the physics of energetic particles interacting with matter.

Short Problems: Energy per Reaction vs Power Constraints

Problem 1: Reaction rate for a target thermal power

A D–T reactor aims to produce 500 MW of thermal power. Use Q = 17.6 MeV per reaction. Estimate the required number of fusion reactions per second.

Check: Convert MeV to joules, then divide power by energy per reaction.

Problem 2: Compare D–T and D–D by energy per event

Assume D–D fusion releases about 3.6 MeV per reaction on average (roughly between its two main branches). Compare the number of reactions per second needed to produce 500 MW(th) using D–D versus D–T.

Prompt: The ratio of required reaction rates is approximately the inverse ratio of Q-values.

Problem 3: Why a higher Q-value may not mean easier power generation

Reaction A releases 18 MeV per event but has a much lower reaction probability at the achievable plasma temperature than Reaction B, which releases 10 MeV per event. Explain, using the idea of reaction rate and confinement, how Reaction B could still yield higher power output.

Hint: Power depends on both energy per reaction and the number of reactions per second; the latter depends strongly on temperature, density, and cross-section.

Problem 4: Neutron energy fraction and material loading (conceptual)

In D–T fusion, most energy leaves as kinetic energy of the neutron. Explain why this simultaneously (i) helps transfer energy to a surrounding blanket for heat extraction and (ii) creates challenges for structural materials.

Problem 5: Binding energy curve reasoning

Without using numbers, explain why fusing two very light nuclei can release energy, but fusing two nuclei already near the most tightly bound region would not release as much (and may require net energy input). Base your reasoning on how binding energy per nucleon changes with mass number.