Degrees vs. Distance: Converting Coordinates into Real-World Measurements

Capítulo 2

Estimated reading time: 5 minutes

+ Exercise

1) From Earth’s Circumference to Degrees

Coordinates are measured in degrees, but travel and mapping problems usually need distance. The bridge between them is the idea that Earth is (approximately) a sphere, so angles around it correspond to fractions of a full circle.

  • A full circle is 360°.
  • Earth’s equatorial circumference is about 40,075 km (about 24,901 miles).

If you walk along the equator, moving 1° in longitude means you’ve traveled roughly:

distance per degree at equator ≈ circumference / 360

Numerically:

  • 40,075 km / 360 ≈ 111.32 km per degree
  • 24,901 mi / 360 ≈ 69.17 mi per degree

This “circumference ÷ 360” idea is the core rule. The only twist is that not every 1° step traces the same-size circle on Earth.

2) Why Latitude Stays Nearly Constant but Longitude Shrinks

1° of latitude: nearly constant

Lines of latitude are parallel circles, but moving north–south by 1° of latitude means changing your angle from Earth’s center by 1° along a meridian (a north–south great-circle path). Because meridians are (approximately) great circles, the north–south distance per degree of latitude is close to constant everywhere.

Continue in our app.
  • Listen to the audio with the screen off.
  • Earn a certificate upon completion.
  • Over 5000 courses for you to explore!
Or continue reading below...
Download App

Download the app

Rule of thumb:

  • 1° latitude ≈ 111 km ≈ 69 miles

It’s “nearly” constant because Earth is slightly flattened (an oblate spheroid), so the exact value varies by about 1% depending on latitude. For estimation, 111 km/° is usually sufficient.

1° of longitude: depends on latitude

Lines of longitude meet at the poles. At the equator, adjacent meridians are far apart; near the poles, they converge. The key geometric idea: at latitude φ, you are moving around a smaller circle whose radius is reduced by cos(φ) compared with the equator.

So the east–west distance represented by 1° of longitude is:

1° longitude ≈ 111.32 km × cos(latitude)

In miles:

1° longitude ≈ 69.17 mi × cos(latitude)

Checks that should make intuitive sense:

  • At latitude (equator), cos(0)=1 → about 111 km per degree.
  • At 60°, cos(60)=0.5 → about 55.7 km per degree.
  • Near 90° (poles), cos(90)=0 → longitude degrees collapse toward 0 km separation.

3) Simple Calculation Rules of Thumb (and When They’re Approximate)

Rules of thumb

QuantityRule of thumbNotes
North–south distanceDistance ≈ Δlatitude(°) × 111 kmUse absolute difference in latitude
East–west distanceDistance ≈ Δlongitude(°) × 111 km × cos(mean latitude)Use a representative latitude (often the midpoint)
Same in milesReplace 111 km with 69 miles69 mi/° is a convenient approximation

When these approximations work well

  • Short to moderate distances (tens to a few hundred kilometers): good for quick estimates.
  • When latitude doesn’t change much for east–west estimates: using the mean latitude is reasonable.
  • When you only need an order-of-magnitude or planning estimate.

When to be cautious

  • Very long distances (thousands of kilometers): Earth curvature and great-circle routing matter; simple “grid rectangle” estimates can drift.
  • Near the poles: longitude distances shrink rapidly; small errors in latitude choice can change results a lot.
  • High precision needs (surveying, aviation navigation): use geodesic formulas or GIS tools rather than rules of thumb.

Step-by-step estimation workflow

  1. Compute coordinate differences: Δlat = |lat2 − lat1|, Δlon = |lon2 − lon1| (in degrees).
  2. Pick a latitude for cosine: mean latitude φ̄ = (lat1 + lat2)/2 (use absolute value for cosine).
  3. Convert: NS ≈ Δlat × 111 km; EW ≈ Δlon × 111 km × cos(φ̄).
  4. If you want a straight-line estimate on the map grid: combine with Pythagoras: Total ≈ √(NS² + EW²).

Note: This last step treats the small patch of Earth as flat. It’s a practical approximation for local/regional distances.

4) Worked Examples (Different Latitudes)

Example A: Estimating north–south distance (latitude change only)

Points: A(10.0°N, 30.0°E) to B(12.5°N, 30.0°E)

  • Δlat = |12.5 − 10.0| = 2.5°
  • Δlon = 0° (same longitude)

Step: Convert latitude degrees to distance.

NS ≈ 2.5 × 111 km ≈ 277.5 km

In miles:

NS ≈ 2.5 × 69 mi ≈ 172.5 mi

Because longitude didn’t change, the total distance is approximately the north–south distance.

Example B: Estimating east–west distance at low latitude

Points: C(5.0°N, 20.0°E) to D(5.0°N, 23.0°E)

  • Δlon = 3.0°
  • Mean latitude φ̄ = 5.0°
  • cos(5°) ≈ 0.996
EW ≈ 3.0 × 111 km × 0.996 ≈ 331.7 km

Compare to equator value (no cosine): 3 × 111 = 333 km. At 5° latitude, the shrink is tiny.

Example C: Estimating east–west distance at mid-latitude

Points: E(45.0°N, 10.0°E) to F(45.0°N, 12.0°E)

  • Δlon = 2.0°
  • φ̄ = 45.0°
  • cos(45°) ≈ 0.707
EW ≈ 2.0 × 111 km × 0.707 ≈ 156.9 km

This illustrates the key idea: the same 2° of longitude is much shorter at 45°N than at the equator (where it would be ~222 km).

Example D: Two points differ in both latitude and longitude (estimate total)

Points: G(30.0°N, 70.0°W) to H(32.0°N, 73.0°W)

  • Δlat = |32.0 − 30.0| = 2.0°
  • Δlon = |−73.0 − (−70.0)| = 3.0°
  • Mean latitude φ̄ = (30.0 + 32.0)/2 = 31.0°
  • cos(31°) ≈ 0.857

North–south component:

NS ≈ 2.0 × 111 km = 222 km

East–west component:

EW ≈ 3.0 × 111 km × 0.857 ≈ 285.4 km

Combine (flat approximation):

Total ≈ √(222^2 + 285.4^2) km ≈ √(49,284 + 81,453) ≈ √130,737 ≈ 361.6 km

This total is an estimate of the straight-line distance over a small region. Over larger spans, a great-circle computation would be more accurate.

Example E: Same longitude difference, different latitudes (showing shrink clearly)

Compare the east–west distance for Δlon = 4° at two latitudes.

Latitudecos(latitude)EW distance for 4° longitude
1.0004 × 111 ≈ 444 km
60°0.5004 × 111 × 0.5 ≈ 222 km

The same coordinate difference can represent dramatically different real distances depending on latitude.

5) Practice Set (with Answer Keys): Estimate Distance and Interpret Errors

Use these rules unless told otherwise:

  • 1° latitude ≈ 111 km (69 mi)
  • 1° longitude ≈ 111 km × cos(mean latitude)
  • Total ≈ √(NS² + EW²) for combined changes

Problems

  1. North–south only: P1(18.0°N, 100.0°E) to P2(20.5°N, 100.0°E). Estimate distance in km.
  2. East–west near equator: P1(2.0°S, 40.0°E) to P2(2.0°S, 41.5°E). Estimate distance in km.
  3. East–west at 50°N: P1(50.0°N, 5.0°E) to P2(50.0°N, 8.0°E). Estimate distance in km.
  4. Both directions (mid-latitude): P1(35.0°N, 120.0°W) to P2(36.2°N, 118.5°W). Estimate NS, EW, and total in km.
  5. Compare shrink: For Δlon = 1.0°, estimate EW distance at latitude 0°, 30°, and 75° (km).
  6. Interpret error: A student estimates an east–west distance at 65°N using 111 km per degree (forgetting cosine). For Δlon = 2°, what is the student’s estimate, what is the corrected estimate, and what is the percent error?

Answer key (showing steps)

  1. Δlat = 20.5 − 18.0 = 2.5°

    Distance ≈ 2.5 × 111 = 277.5 km
  2. Δlon = 41.5 − 40.0 = 1.5°; mean latitude φ̄ = 2°; cos(2°) ≈ 0.999

    EW ≈ 1.5 × 111 × 0.999 ≈ 166.3 km (≈ 166.5 km if rounded)
  3. Δlon = 3.0°; φ̄ = 50°; cos(50°) ≈ 0.643

    EW ≈ 3.0 × 111 × 0.643 ≈ 214.1 km
  4. Δlat = 36.2 − 35.0 = 1.2°; Δlon = |−118.5 − (−120.0)| = 1.5°; φ̄ = (35.0 + 36.2)/2 = 35.6°; cos(35.6°) ≈ 0.813

    NS ≈ 1.2 × 111 = 133.2 km
    EW ≈ 1.5 × 111 × 0.813 ≈ 135.4 km
    Total ≈ √(133.2^2 + 135.4^2) ≈ √(17,742 + 18,333) ≈ √36,075 ≈ 189.9 km
  5. Use EW ≈ 1 × 111 × cos(latitude)

    • 0°: cos(0)=1 → 111 km
    • 30°: cos(30)≈0.866 → 96.1 km
    • 75°: cos(75)≈0.259 → 28.7 km
  6. Student (incorrect):

    EW_student ≈ 2 × 111 = 222 km

    Corrected: cos(65°) ≈ 0.423

    EW_correct ≈ 2 × 111 × 0.423 ≈ 93.9 km

    Percent error (relative to correct):

    Error% ≈ (222 − 93.9) / 93.9 × 100 ≈ 136%

    Interpretation: at high latitudes, forgetting the cosine factor can more than double the estimate.

Now answer the exercise about the content:

Why does the real-world distance represented by 1° of longitude get smaller as you move toward the poles?

You are right! Congratulations, now go to the next page

You missed! Try again.

Meridians converge toward the poles. At latitude φ, the east–west circle has a smaller radius by cos(φ), so 1° longitude ≈ 111 km × cos(latitude) and shrinks with increasing latitude.

Next chapter

Hemispheres, Signs, and Coordinate Notation: Avoiding Common Confusions

Arrow Right Icon
Free Ebook cover Time Zones, Latitude, and Longitude: The Geography of Global Position
20%

Time Zones, Latitude, and Longitude: The Geography of Global Position

New course

10 pages

Download the app to earn free Certification and listen to the courses in the background, even with the screen off.