What Aftershocks Are (Operationally) and Why They Matter
Aftershocks are earthquakes that occur in the same general region as a larger event and are statistically linked to it through changes in stress and ongoing fault adjustment. In practice, the term is used operationally: an event is labeled an “aftershock” because it follows a mainshock in time and occurs near it in space, not because we can directly observe the physical cause for each individual rupture. This operational definition matters for hazard awareness because it supports a simple, useful idea: after a damaging earthquake, the probability of more earthquakes nearby is temporarily elevated, and it decays with time.
For community resilience, the key point is not predicting the exact time of the next aftershock. The key point is managing a time-varying risk: the days to weeks after a mainshock can be among the most hazardous periods for responders, residents, and critical infrastructure. Aftershocks can trigger additional damage to already-weakened buildings, cause rockfalls and landslides on slopes that were destabilized by the mainshock, and disrupt lifelines (water, power, transportation) during repair operations.
Core Patterns: How Aftershock Rates Change with Time
Omori-type decay: “Many soon, fewer later”
A consistent empirical pattern is that aftershock rates are highest immediately after the mainshock and then decrease over time. A common mathematical form used in practice is Omori’s law (and its modified versions), which captures the idea that the rate decays roughly like a power law. You do not need the equation to use the concept: if you are making decisions about safety and operations, assume the first hours to days carry the greatest aftershock frequency, and that the frequency declines but does not drop to zero quickly.
Practical implication: if you are planning inspections, debris removal, or re-entry into damaged buildings, the timing matters. A task done in the first 12 hours may face a much higher chance of being interrupted by strong shaking than the same task done a week later. This does not mean “wait a week” is always feasible; it means you should scale protective measures to the period of highest rate.
Secondary bursts and “aftershocks of aftershocks”
Aftershock sequences are not smooth. You can see bursts: a moderate aftershock can be followed by its own cluster, temporarily increasing the rate again. Operationally, this is why short-term advisories often update after a notable aftershock. A community might feel that “it started up again,” but statistically this can be consistent with clustered behavior rather than a new, separate crisis.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...
Download the app
Core Patterns: How Aftershock Sizes Are Distributed
Many small, few large
Aftershock magnitudes follow a size-frequency relationship: small events are far more common than large ones. This is why you may feel many small shakes but only occasionally experience a damaging one. The practical takeaway is twofold: (1) do not interpret a run of small aftershocks as “releasing all the energy” in a way that guarantees safety, and (2) do not interpret the absence of felt aftershocks as proof that the sequence is over.
How big can the largest aftershock be?
A widely used rule of thumb is that the largest aftershock is often about 1 magnitude unit smaller than the mainshock, but there is variability. This is not a guarantee and should not be used as a hard ceiling. It is a planning heuristic: after a large mainshock, it is reasonable to prepare for at least one aftershock capable of causing additional damage, especially if structures are already compromised.
Practical implication: if a mainshock caused widespread cracking, unreinforced masonry damage, or slope failures, even a smaller aftershock can be disproportionately harmful because vulnerability has increased. Hazard is not only about shaking level; it is shaking plus current condition.
Core Patterns: Where Aftershocks Occur
Spatial clustering around the rupture zone
Aftershocks tend to cluster around the area of the mainshock rupture and nearby fault segments that experienced stress changes. They often outline the rupture zone in map view, but not perfectly. Some aftershocks occur outside the main rupture area, including on adjacent faults. For practical hazard awareness, this means the “affected area” can be broader than the zone of strongest mainshock damage, especially when considering landslides, liquefaction-prone ground, or critical lifelines that cross multiple fault blocks.
Depth and local conditions
Aftershocks can occur at similar depths to the mainshock but may also span a range. Depth influences how widely shaking is felt and how it couples into surface hazards. Communities should avoid assuming that “it’s just aftershocks” means “it will be weak.” A moderate aftershock at shallow depth can produce strong local shaking.
Short-Term Forecast Thinking: What It Is and What It Is Not
Short-term earthquake forecasting is the practice of estimating the probability of earthquakes of different sizes occurring in a region over a specified time window, often days to weeks, using statistical models and real-time observations. It is not deterministic prediction. It does not provide a single time and place for the next event. Instead, it provides a changing probability landscape that can inform decisions.
In a resilience context, the goal is to translate probability into action thresholds: when should inspections be accelerated, when should certain operations be paused, when should temporary shelters remain open, and how should public messaging be framed to avoid complacency or panic?
Two useful mental models
Baseline vs elevated probability: compare the current aftershock period to “normal times.” Even if the absolute probability of a damaging aftershock is not huge, it can be many times higher than baseline for the same area.
Time window thinking: probabilities are tied to a window (e.g., next 24 hours, next 7 days). A “5% chance in 7 days” is not the same as “5% chance tomorrow.”
A Practical Step-by-Step: Using Forecast Thinking for Safer Decisions
The steps below are designed for community leaders, facility managers, response teams, and informed residents. They do not require you to compute probabilities yourself; they help you use official advisories and observable conditions in a structured way.
Step 1: Define the decision you are trying to make
Forecast thinking is only useful when tied to a decision. Examples:
Can residents re-enter a damaged apartment building to retrieve belongings?
Should a road cut beneath unstable slopes be reopened?
Should repair crews work inside a cracked water-treatment facility?
Should schools resume in-person classes in buildings with minor damage?
Write the decision in one sentence and list what could go wrong if strong shaking occurs during the activity.
Step 2: Identify the exposure window
Specify when and for how long people will be exposed. A 20-minute retrieval trip is different from an 8-hour shift inside a damaged structure. Exposure window examples:
0.5 hours (retrieve medications)
4 hours (inspection team)
12 hours (utility repair shift)
7 days (temporary housing plan)
Shorter exposure windows can sometimes be managed with stricter controls rather than full cancellation.
Step 3: Check the latest official aftershock information
Use the most recent statements from authoritative agencies that issue aftershock forecasts or advisories. Focus on:
Time window (next day vs next week)
Magnitude threshold (e.g., probability of M5+)
Geographic area covered
Whether the forecast updated after a notable aftershock
Do not average multiple sources casually; if different agencies use different regions or thresholds, you may be comparing unlike quantities.
Step 4: Translate probability into operational categories
Many teams work better with categories than raw percentages. Create local categories such as:
Elevated: aftershock rate clearly above baseline; maintain heightened controls.
High: strong aftershocks plausible in the next day or two; restrict high-risk activities in damaged structures.
Very high: immediately after mainshock or after a large aftershock; life-safety operations only, with maximum protective measures.
These categories should be pre-linked to actions (see Step 6). The categories can be triggered by time since mainshock, by official forecast levels, or by local observations (e.g., repeated moderate aftershocks).
Step 5: Update vulnerability assumptions based on current damage
Aftershocks are dangerous because they act on weakened systems. Update your vulnerability picture:
Buildings: cracked walls, leaning chimneys, damaged parapets, soft-story signs, fallen ceiling tiles, broken glazing.
Nonstructural hazards: unsecured shelving, hanging lights, sprinkler systems, chemical storage.
Slopes: fresh rockfall debris, tension cracks, bulging ground, blocked drains.
Lifelines: temporary pipe repairs, compromised bridge bearings, damaged substations.
If vulnerability is high, even moderate aftershocks can create unacceptable risk.
Step 6: Choose controls that match the category
Controls reduce risk without requiring certainty about the next aftershock. Examples:
Engineering/physical controls: shoring, cordons around parapets, slope netting where feasible, temporary supports for utilities.
Administrative controls: limit time inside damaged buildings, require buddy system, establish check-in/out, restrict access to certain zones, schedule work during daylight for better situational awareness.
Preparedness controls: ensure drop-cover-hold training for crews, keep exits clear, stage medical kits, maintain radio communications.
Example: If the category is “High” for the next 48 hours, a facility manager might allow only short, supervised entries for critical retrieval, prohibit work under damaged masonry, and require hard hats and spotters near exterior walls.
Step 7: Set a review cadence
Because aftershock rates change quickly, set a schedule to revisit decisions. Typical cadences:
Every 2–4 hours in the first day for critical operations
Daily for the first week
After any notable aftershock (felt strongly or reported as moderate/large)
Attach the cadence to who is responsible for checking updates and who has authority to pause operations.
Common Misconceptions and How to Correct Them
Misconception 1: “Aftershocks are smaller and harmless”
Reality: aftershocks are often smaller than the mainshock, but “smaller” does not mean “safe.” A moderate aftershock can cause severe damage if structures are already compromised, if it is shallow, or if it occurs close to vulnerable sites. Corrective message: treat aftershocks as a continuing hazard, especially for damaged buildings and slopes.
Misconception 2: “A bunch of small aftershocks means the danger is being released”
Reality: the occurrence of small aftershocks does not reliably reduce the chance of a larger one in the short term. Sequences can include many small events and still produce a damaging aftershock. Corrective message: do not use “it’s been shaking a lot” as reassurance; use time since mainshock and official updates to guide decisions.
Misconception 3: “If we haven’t felt anything for a day, it’s over”
Reality: aftershock rates decay, but they can persist for weeks to months, and felt shaking depends on magnitude, depth, distance, and local conditions. A quiet period can be followed by a notable aftershock. Corrective message: quiet does not equal zero risk; it usually means reduced frequency, not elimination.
Misconception 4: “The next big one will be exactly 1 magnitude smaller”
Reality: the “one magnitude smaller” idea is a rough planning heuristic, not a rule. The largest aftershock can be smaller or, in rare cases, comparable to the mainshock if the sequence is reclassified (what was thought to be the mainshock becomes a foreshock). Corrective message: plan for a range of plausible aftershock sizes and focus on vulnerability reduction.
Misconception 5: “Aftershocks happen only on the same fault trace”
Reality: aftershocks can occur on nearby faults or fault strands due to stress redistribution. Corrective message: keep situational awareness across the broader region, especially where lifelines and transportation corridors cross multiple structures.
Misconception 6: “Scientists can’t forecast anything, so advisories are useless”
Reality: short-term forecasts are probabilistic tools, similar in spirit to weather chance-of-rain statements. They are useful for scaling precautions even when they cannot specify exact timing. Corrective message: use forecasts to choose sensible controls and review schedules, not to demand certainty.
Misconception 7: “A warning means a big aftershock will happen”
Reality: advisories communicate elevated probability, not certainty. Many time windows will pass without a damaging aftershock even when probability is elevated. Corrective message: treat advisories as guidance for preparedness and risk management, not as a promise of an event.
Misconception 8: “If an aftershock happens, the forecast was wrong”
Reality: a forecast that assigns a nonzero probability to an event is not “wrong” if the event occurs; it is consistent with the probability. Likewise, it is not “wrong” if the event does not occur. Corrective message: evaluate forecasts over many cases, and use them as decision aids rather than pass/fail predictions.
Recognizing When a Sequence Might Be Changing
While you should not attempt to diagnose complex sequence behavior from anecdotes, there are practical cues that justify heightened caution and checking updated advisories:
A notably larger aftershock: a jump in size can reset public risk perception and may increase the short-term rate locally.
Strong shaking in a new area: could indicate activity on an adjacent structure, expanding the area of concern.
Repeated moderate events: may sustain higher operational risk for longer than expected.
New damage reports: even without a large event, accumulating damage increases vulnerability.
These cues are triggers for operational updates: re-check building tags, re-walk evacuation routes, re-evaluate slope stability, and confirm that temporary repairs can tolerate renewed shaking.
Practical Examples: Applying Forecast Thinking in Real Situations
Example A: Re-entering a damaged home for essentials
Scenario: A family’s home has cracked plaster, a shifted water heater, and fallen items. They want to retrieve medications and documents.
Decision: short entry for critical items.
Exposure window: 10–15 minutes.
Controls: one person enters while another stays outside; avoid rooms with heavy overhead items; keep shoes and head protection; identify two exits; do not use elevators; shut off gas if odor or damage is suspected; do not linger to “clean up.”
Review cadence: if a strong aftershock occurs, pause entries until conditions are rechecked.
Example B: Utility repair in a partially damaged facility
Scenario: A repair crew must restore water service. The pump station has visible cracking and some ceiling damage.
Decision: proceed with repairs under elevated aftershock probability.
Exposure window: multiple 6–8 hour shifts.
Controls: restrict work zones away from cracked masonry; install temporary bracing where feasible; require hard hats and eye protection; establish a “shaking protocol” (stop work, move to pre-identified safe spots, account for personnel); keep heavy tools secured; ensure rapid egress routes are not blocked by debris.
Review cadence: briefings at shift start and mid-shift; immediate reassessment after any strong shaking.
Example C: Managing slope hazards along a road corridor
Scenario: A mountain road is critical for supplies. The mainshock triggered small rockfalls; crews want to clear debris and reopen.
Decision: staged reopening with monitoring.
Exposure window: continuous public exposure if reopened.
Controls: clear debris but keep spotters; restrict stopping zones; implement daylight-only travel initially; place barriers and signage (physical, not just informational) to keep vehicles away from the toe of slopes; consider pilot-car convoys; monitor for fresh rockfall after aftershocks; pre-identify pullouts that are not under steep cuts.
Review cadence: daily slope checks for the first week; immediate closure if rockfall resumes.
Communicating Aftershock Risk Without Fueling Panic or Complacency
Effective messaging connects three elements: what is known, what is uncertain, and what people should do today. Avoid absolute statements like “you are safe now” or “a big one is coming.” Instead, use time-window language and action language.
Known: aftershock probability is elevated right now compared to normal.
Uncertain: we cannot say exactly when a strong aftershock will occur.
Action: avoid damaged buildings, secure heavy items, follow inspection tags, and be ready to protect yourself during shaking.
For teams, pair messaging with checklists. For the public, pair messaging with simple behaviors: keep shoes and a flashlight near the bed, keep exits clear, and practice what to do during shaking. For organizations, pair messaging with operational triggers: “If we feel strong shaking, we pause work and re-inspect.”
Simple Field Notes You Can Collect During an Aftershock Period
You do not need specialized instruments to contribute to safer decisions. The goal is to document changes that affect vulnerability and access. Keep notes consistent and time-stamped.
Damage progression: new cracks, widening cracks, fallen parapet pieces, new ceiling failures.
Ground and slope changes: new rockfall debris, fresh soil cracks, small slides, blocked culverts.
Nonstructural hazards: newly toppled shelves, broken sprinkler lines, shifted cylinders or tanks.
Access and egress: jammed doors, blocked stairwells, damaged ramps, compromised bridges.
These notes help prioritize inspections and can inform whether an aftershock has materially changed conditions even if the shaking felt “moderate.”
Mini-Toolkit: A Shaking Protocol for Work Crews
Work crews operating during an aftershock period benefit from a rehearsed protocol. Adapt the following to your setting:
Shaking Protocol (Worksite) 1) Stop: cease hazardous tasks immediately (cutting, lifting, welding, working at height). 2) Protect: move to a pre-identified safer location (away from exterior walls, parapets, tall shelves, suspended loads). 3) Hold: maintain position until shaking stops; do not run outside under falling hazards. 4) Account: supervisor conducts headcount and checks injuries. 5) Assess: inspect for new damage, leaks, electrical hazards, rockfall, or blocked exits. 6) Decide: resume, restrict, or evacuate based on assessment and current advisory level. 7) Report: document time, observed effects, and actions taken.This protocol turns uncertain aftershock timing into a manageable operational routine, reducing injuries and preventing secondary incidents during repairs.
