Risk per Trade: The One Number That Controls Everything
Risk per trade is the maximum amount of money you are willing to lose on a single trade if your stop-loss is hit. It is not a feeling, and it is not the amount you hope to lose “at most.” It is a predefined dollar amount that becomes the anchor for position sizing, stop placement, and your ability to survive a losing streak.
Think of risk per trade as a budget. You can spend it on a wide stop with a small position, or a tight stop with a larger position—but the budget stays the same.
Key idea: Risk per trade links stop distance to position size
Once you choose an entry and a stop, you know the stop distance (in dollars per share/contract). Your position size is then determined by how much you can lose.
- Dollar risk per trade = (Entry price − Stop price) × Position size (for longs)
- Dollar risk per trade = (Stop price − Entry price) × Position size (for shorts)
In practice, you use the absolute difference between entry and stop.
Position Sizing Formula (Step-by-Step)
This is the core formula you should be able to apply quickly and consistently.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...Download the app
Step 1: Set your maximum dollar risk per trade
Choose a fixed amount based on your account size and comfort. Many beginners start with a small fraction of their account (for example, 0.25%–1%). The exact percentage is less important than being consistent and conservative.
Step 2: Define entry price and stop price
Your stop should be placed where your trade idea is invalidated (more on this below). Once you have entry and stop, compute the stop distance.
Step 3: Compute stop distance
Stop distance = |Entry price − Stop price|
Step 4: Compute position size
Position size = Max dollar risk per trade ÷ Stop distance
Then round down to a tradable size (whole shares, or the correct contract size). Rounding down is important: it keeps your risk from creeping higher.
Worked examples
| Scenario | Entry | Stop | Max $ Risk | Stop Distance | Position Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long stock | $50.00 | $49.50 | $100 | $0.50 | 200 shares |
| Long stock (wider stop) | $50.00 | $49.00 | $100 | $1.00 | 100 shares |
| Short stock | $80.00 | $81.20 | $150 | $1.20 | 125 shares (round down) |
Notice how the wider stop forces a smaller position to keep the same risk. This is exactly what you want: the market decides the stop distance; you decide the risk budget.
Practical checklist before you place the order
- Do I know my exact stop price?
- Did I compute position size from risk (not from “how much I want to make”)?
- After rounding, is my actual risk ≤ my max risk?
Stop Placement Principles: Structure-Based vs. Arbitrary Stops
A stop-loss is not just a “pain threshold.” It is a price level that proves your trade thesis wrong. Good stops are typically structure-based; poor stops are often arbitrary.
Structure-based stops (preferred)
Structure-based stops use market structure to define invalidation. Examples include:
- Below a swing low for a long (or above a swing high for a short)
- Below/above a key level you are trading against (support/resistance, pre-defined levels on your chart)
- Beyond a consolidation range (if price breaks the range, the setup is wrong)
These stops have a logic: if price reaches that level, the reason you entered is no longer present.
Arbitrary stops (use with caution)
Arbitrary stops are based on a fixed amount (e.g., “I always use a 20-cent stop”) regardless of context. The problem is that the market does not care about your fixed number. Arbitrary stops often lead to:
- Stops that are too tight and get hit by normal noise
- Inconsistent risk/reward characteristics across trades
- Emotional stop-moving because the stop was not logically placed
If you do use a standardized stop method, it should still be tied to structure (for example, “stop goes beyond the most recent swing”) rather than a random distance.
Managing Trades Without Impulsively Moving Stops
Moving a stop impulsively is one of the fastest ways to turn a controlled loss into an account-damaging event. Your stop is a promise to yourself: “If I’m wrong, I exit.”
Pre-commitment rules: decide stop behavior before entry
Before you enter, decide which of these categories your stop management belongs to:
- Hard stop (default for beginners): Stop stays where it is until hit or until you exit by plan.
- Planned trail: Stop moves only when a predefined condition occurs (e.g., after a new swing forms, or after price reaches a specific multiple of risk).
- Time-based exit: If price does not move as expected within a set time window, you exit (without widening the stop).
Two common “bad stop moves” to eliminate
- Widening the stop to avoid being wrong: This increases your risk mid-trade and breaks your sizing math.
- Tightening the stop out of fear: This often causes premature exits and inconsistent results.
A simple, rule-based stop adjustment method (example)
If you want a mechanical approach that reduces emotion, use a conditional rule such as:
- Initial stop is structure-based.
- When price reaches
+1R(one times your initial risk), move stop to break-even only if structure supports it (e.g., a higher low formed for a long). - After that, trail behind new structure points (e.g., behind higher lows) rather than arbitrary increments.
R is your initial risk per share/contract: R = |Entry − Stop|. This keeps your management consistent across different price levels and instruments.
Daily Loss Limits, Max Trades, and Cool-Off Rules (Anti-Revenge Trading)
Even with perfect per-trade risk, a bad day can spiral if you keep trading emotionally. Daily limits are your circuit breakers.
Daily loss limit: define it in dollars and in “R”
A practical approach is to set a daily max loss as a multiple of your per-trade risk:
- Daily max loss = 2R to 4R (common training range)
- Example: If your risk per trade is $100 (1R), a 3R daily limit means you stop trading at −$300 realized loss.
Using “R” keeps the rule consistent even if you later adjust your per-trade risk.
Max number of trades per day
Overtrading often follows small losses or missed moves. A max-trades rule reduces impulsive clicking and forces selectivity.
- Example: Max 3–5 trades/day for beginners
- Alternative: Max 2 consecutive losses before stopping
Cool-off rules (mandatory pause after a trigger)
Cool-off rules are not optional “breaks.” They are predefined pauses that prevent revenge trading.
Common triggers:
- After any trade that hits full stop
- After two losing trades in a row
- After reaching −2R on the day
Common cool-off actions:
- Step away for 15–30 minutes
- Review screenshots of the last trade and write a 3-sentence post-trade note (setup, execution, rule compliance)
- Only resume if the next trade meets your checklist and you can restate your stop and risk out loud
Leverage and Margin: Why It Magnifies Both Outcomes and Pressure
Leverage allows you to control a larger position than your cash balance would normally permit. This can amplify returns, but it also amplifies losses and—crucially—emotional pressure.
How leverage changes the risk experience
- P&L swings feel larger: Even small price moves can create large dollar changes.
- Decision speed increases: Bigger swings can push you into reactive decisions (panic exits, stop widening, revenge trades).
- Margin calls/liquidations become possible: If losses exceed thresholds, your broker may close positions.
Beginner guideline: keep exposure conservative
Instead of thinking “How much can I buy?”, think “How little exposure do I need to execute my plan?” Conservative exposure means:
- Risk per trade stays small and fixed.
- Position size is derived from stop distance (not from available margin).
- You avoid scaling up quickly after wins.
A useful internal rule is: if the position size makes you feel you must watch every tick, it is probably too large for your current skill level.
Template: Personal Risk Policy (Adjustable Parameters)
Use this as a written policy you can keep next to your trading screen. The goal is to make risk decisions before you are in a trade.
PERSONAL RISK POLICY (Day Trading) — v1.0 (Adjustable Parameters)| Category | Rule | My Setting |
|---|---|---|
| Account reference | Use account value updated | Weekly / Monthly |
| Risk per trade | Max $ loss if stop is hit | $____ (or ____% of account) |
| Stop requirement | Every trade must have a stop price before entry | Yes / No |
| Stop placement | Structure-based invalidation level | e.g., below swing low / above swing high |
| Position sizing | Size = Max $ Risk ÷ |Entry − Stop| (round down) | Always |
| Max daily loss | Stop trading at −(multiple of R) realized | −____R (e.g., −3R) |
| Max trades/day | Hard cap on number of entries | ____ trades |
| Consecutive loss rule | Stop trading after ____ losses in a row | ____ losses |
| Cool-off rule | Mandatory pause after trigger | ____ minutes + review notes |
| Stop movement | No widening stops; only planned adjustments | Hard stop / Planned trail |
| Leverage use | Use margin only if it does not increase $ risk per trade | Yes / No |
| Scaling | Increase risk per trade only after rule-compliant sample size | After ____ trades |
Fill-in example (to model how specific it should be)
- Risk per trade:
$75 - Stop placement: beyond the most recent swing (idea invalidation)
- Position sizing:
Shares = 75 ÷ |Entry − Stop|, round down - Max daily loss:
−3R(stop trading at −$225 realized) - Max trades/day:
4 - Consecutive losses: stop after
2 - Cool-off:
20 minutesafter any full stop-out - Stop movement: never widen; move to break-even only after
+1Rand structure confirms - Leverage: allowed only if it does not change the above rules