What Counts as a Revolution (and What Does Not)
Revolution means a rapid, contested transformation of (1) political authority (who rules and why) and (2) social order (how power, rights, and resources are organized). “Rapid” does not mean instantaneous; it means the pace of change is compressed into a short period compared with normal politics. “Contested” means multiple actors claim authority and legitimacy at the same time.
Three Criteria You Can Use Every Time
- Mass participation: large-scale mobilization beyond elite circles (street politics, militias, mass parties, strikes, popular committees, peasant uprisings, etc.).
- Claims to legitimacy: challengers do not merely seize power; they justify it (e.g., “the nation,” “the people,” “workers,” “the faithful,” “the constitution,” “self-determination”).
- Institutional redesign: durable changes to core rules and institutions (constitutions, property rights, citizenship rules, courts, policing, land tenure, labor regimes, sovereignty arrangements).
Distinguishing Revolutions from Coups, Reforms, and Civil Wars
| Event type | Mass participation | Claims to legitimacy | Institutional redesign | Quick diagnostic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coup | Low | Often narrow (security, “order”) | Limited; leadership swap | Elite seizure of executive power with minimal redesign |
| Reform | Variable | Usually within existing legal order | Incremental; institutions persist | Change through established procedures; no dual legitimacy crisis |
| Civil war | Can be high | Competing claims common | Not required; may end with restoration | Armed contest over control; may or may not transform social order |
| Revolution | High | Broad, foundational (“new order”) | High; redesign of authority and social order | Mass mobilization + legitimacy contest + institutional refounding |
Important overlap: Revolutions can include coups (an elite move inside a broader upheaval) and can occur during civil wars (armed struggle plus institutional refounding). Your task is to classify the dominant process using the criteria above.
(1) Concept Toolkit: The Building Blocks of Revolutionary Change
Use these concepts as “labels” you can attach to evidence. They help you compare very different cases without getting lost in local details.
State Capacity
State capacity is the ability to extract resources (tax), enforce rules (police/army), and deliver basic administration (courts, records, services). Low capacity can invite challengers; high capacity can repress or co-opt them.
- Indicators: tax collection effectiveness, control over territory, bureaucratic reach, reliability of security forces.
- Practical use: When protests spread, ask: can the state pay troops, keep supply lines, and maintain routine administration?
Sovereignty
Sovereignty is the recognized right to rule a territory and make binding decisions. Revolutions often create dual sovereignty: two authorities each claim to be the real state.
- Listen to the audio with the screen off.
- Earn a certificate upon completion.
- Over 5000 courses for you to explore!
Download the app
- Indicators: rival governments, competing security forces, parallel courts, alternative tax collection.
Citizenship
Citizenship defines who belongs politically and what membership entails (voting, military service, welfare, legal standing). Revolutions frequently rewrite citizenship boundaries.
- Questions to ask: Who becomes a citizen? Who loses status? Is citizenship tied to property, gender, religion, ethnicity, or birthplace?
Rights
Rights are enforceable claims individuals or groups can make against the state and others (speech, assembly, due process, labor rights, land rights). Revolutionary moments often expand rights on paper while restricting them in practice for “enemies.”
- Indicators: new declarations/constitutions, new courts, emergency laws, censorship, policing changes.
Class
Class refers to positions in an economic order (owners, workers, peasants, professionals) and the conflicts and alliances among them. Revolutions can be driven by class coalitions that later fracture.
- Practical use: Identify who pays, who profits, who is indebted, and who controls land or factories.
Race
Race (and racialization) structures access to rights, labor, land, and security. Revolutionary promises of equality often collide with entrenched racial hierarchies.
- Indicators: segregation laws, differential policing, labor coercion, exclusion from voting or land ownership.
Empire
Empire is rule across diverse peoples and territories, often with unequal citizenship and extraction. Many modern revolutions are also anti-imperial struggles over sovereignty and membership.
- Indicators: colonial administrations, unequal legal codes, resource extraction, foreign garrisons, “protectorate” arrangements.
(2) A Recurring Causal Model: Five Drivers That Often Combine
Revolutions rarely have a single cause. A useful approach is to treat them as a stack of pressures that interact until institutions fail and new claimants emerge.
Driver A: Inequality and Hierarchy
Persistent inequality (wealth, land, status) and hierarchy (legal privilege, racial caste, gender exclusion) create grievances and make broad coalitions possible.
- Look for: land concentration, regressive taxation, food insecurity, legal privileges, blocked mobility.
- Mechanism: grievances become political when people believe the system is unjust and changeable.
Driver B: New Political Ideas
Ideas supply the language of legitimacy: popular sovereignty, constitutionalism, socialism, nationalism, religious renewal, anti-colonial self-determination. Ideas do not “cause” revolutions alone; they help people coordinate and justify action.
- Look for: pamphlets, petitions, sermons, party programs, slogans, new media networks.
- Mechanism: shared frames reduce coordination costs—people know what they are fighting for, not only against.
Driver C: Fiscal-Military Pressures and War
War and military competition strain budgets, expose incompetence, and can delegitimize rulers. Defeat can shatter the myth of state strength; victory can still produce debt and demobilized fighters.
- Look for: rising taxes, conscription crises, inflation, unpaid soldiers, veterans’ movements, foreign intervention.
- Mechanism: fiscal stress forces rulers to bargain, repress, or reform—each option can trigger backlash.
Driver D: Economic Disruption
Sharp disruptions—price spikes, unemployment, trade shocks, technological change—can turn latent discontent into mass action, especially when daily survival is threatened.
- Look for: bread/food price surges, wage collapse, debt crises, supply chain breakdowns, sudden austerity.
- Mechanism: disruption changes risk calculations: protest becomes less costly than endurance.
Driver E: Institutional Breakdown
Institutions break when rules no longer resolve conflict: courts lose authority, legislatures deadlock, security forces split, or the executive cannot govern routinely. This is where “contested authority” becomes visible.
- Look for: mutinies, rival assemblies, emergency decrees, refusal to enforce orders, mass defections.
- Mechanism: breakdown creates openings for challengers to build alternative institutions.
Step-by-Step: How to Apply the Causal Model to Any Case
- List pressures under A–E using concrete evidence (prices, taxes, laws, wars, strikes, splits in the army).
- Identify the trigger: the event that converts pressure into open contest (e.g., a crackdown, a fiscal decree, an election crisis, a military defeat).
- Map coalitions: which groups align initially, and what do they want (rights, land, autonomy, order)?
- Locate the legitimacy claim: what principle is invoked to justify the new authority?
- Check for institutional redesign: what new rules are proposed or imposed?
(3) Outcomes Model: What Revolutions Change (and How to Measure It)
Outcomes are not just “success” or “failure.” Use four dimensions to compare what a revolution produces over time.
Outcome 1: Regime Type
Track how authority is organized after the upheaval: constitutional republic, one-party state, military regime, theocracy, restored monarchy, federal breakup, etc.
- Measures: executive constraints, election competitiveness, civil liberties, role of the military, party system rules.
Outcome 2: Property and Labor Systems
Revolutions often rework who owns what and who must work under what conditions.
- Measures: land reform, nationalization/privatization, labor rights, union power, coerced labor, debt peonage, workplace control.
Outcome 3: Inclusion and Exclusion
Who is inside the political community, and on what terms? Revolutions can expand citizenship while creating new exclusions (class enemies, racialized groups, religious minorities, “counterrevolutionaries”).
- Measures: suffrage rules, equal protection, minority rights, gender equality, policing and surveillance, political imprisonment.
Outcome 4: International Realignment
Revolutions can shift alliances, provoke intervention, inspire copycat movements, or change a state’s place in the world economy.
- Measures: treaty changes, recognition/non-recognition, sanctions, new blocs, decolonization, border changes, migration flows.
Step-by-Step: Scoring Outcomes Without Getting Lost in Details
- Define the baseline: what the regime type, property/labor rules, inclusion boundaries, and alliances looked like just before the crisis.
- Identify the “new rules”: constitutions, decrees, land laws, citizenship codes, security institutions.
- Separate promises from enforcement: note gaps between formal rights and actual practice.
- Track reversals: many revolutions swing between radicalization and stabilization; record each major turn.
Comparative Matrix (Reusable in Later Chapters)
Use this matrix as a worksheet. Fill it in with short phrases and evidence. The goal is comparability across cases.
| Category | What to record | Evidence examples |
|---|---|---|
| Event classification | Revolution / coup / reform / civil war (or hybrid) | Mass mobilization? dual sovereignty? institutional refounding? |
| Actors | Incumbents, challengers, swing groups | Army factions, workers, peasants, students, clerics, business elites |
| Legitimacy claim | What principle justifies rule? | “The people,” constitution, religion, nation, class, anti-imperialism |
| State capacity | Strong/weak; where it fails | Tax collapse, mutiny, administrative paralysis, territorial loss |
| A: Inequality/hierarchy | Main grievances and blocked mobility | Land concentration, racial caste, legal privilege, hunger |
| B: Ideas | Mobilizing ideologies and programs | Declarations, party platforms, manifestos, sermons |
| C: War/fiscal-military | War pressures and military splits | Defeat, conscription riots, unpaid troops, foreign intervention |
| D: Economic disruption | Shocks that change daily life | Inflation, unemployment, austerity, trade collapse |
| E: Institutional breakdown | Where rules stop working | Rival assemblies, emergency rule, court delegitimation |
| Outcome: regime type | New authority structure | Constitutional order, one-party system, military rule |
| Outcome: property/labor | Ownership and work rules | Land reform, nationalization, labor protections, coercion |
| Outcome: inclusion/exclusion | Who gains/loses membership | Suffrage expansion, minority repression, new citizenship tests |
| Outcome: international | External alignment and recognition | New alliances, sanctions, decolonization, border changes |
Practice Vignettes: Classify the Event Using the Criteria
Read each vignette and decide: revolution, coup, reform, civil war, or hybrid. Then justify your answer with the three criteria (mass participation, legitimacy claims, institutional redesign) and note which causal drivers (A–E) are most visible.
Vignette 1: The Midnight Transfer
A small group of senior officers detains the head of government overnight, announces a “temporary council,” suspends parliament for six months, and promises new elections. Streets remain mostly quiet; most ministries continue operating under the same laws. No new constitution is proposed.
- Classification prompts: How broad is participation? Is legitimacy grounded in a new principle or “order”? Are institutions redesigned or merely paused?
Vignette 2: The Bread Strike Coalition
After months of food price spikes and wage arrears, strikes spread across major cities. Neighborhood committees coordinate distribution and security as police withdraw. Protest leaders issue a declaration claiming authority in the name of “the people” and call for a constituent assembly to rewrite citizenship and property laws.
- Classification prompts: Do committees create dual sovereignty? What institutional redesign is proposed? Which drivers (D and E?) appear strongest?
Vignette 3: The Negotiated Charter
Large demonstrations push the monarch to accept a new charter expanding voting rights and limiting royal veto power. The existing bureaucracy and courts remain intact. Elections are held under revised rules; the old elite parties still dominate, but new parties enter parliament.
- Classification prompts: Is this reform or revolution? Does the change refound authority or adjust it? How deep is redesign?
Vignette 4: Two Flags, One Capital
Following a disputed election, an opposition coalition forms an alternative government and gains control of several ministries with help from defecting security units. The incumbent retains the central bank and national broadcaster. Both sides collect taxes in different districts; foreign governments recognize different authorities.
- Classification prompts: Is this dual sovereignty? Does it become civil war, revolution, or both? What evidence shows institutional breakdown?
Vignette 5: Independence and Social Refounding
A colonized territory declares independence after mass boycotts and armed clashes. The new leadership abolishes forced labor, redistributes land from settler estates, and creates a citizenship law prioritizing the formerly excluded majority. International recognition is contested; sanctions and aid arrive from rival blocs.
- Classification prompts: How do empire and sovereignty shape the case? Which outcomes (property/labor, inclusion, international realignment) are most pronounced?
Actor Mapping: A Quick Tool for Identifying Who Can Make or Break a Revolution
When you analyze any case, list actors in three columns. This prevents you from treating “the people” as a single unit.
| Incumbent pillars | Challengers | Swing groups |
|---|---|---|
| Executive circle; top bureaucracy; security services; state media; major landlords/oligarchs | Opposition parties; unions; peasant leagues; student groups; religious networks; insurgents | Middle ranks of army/police; civil servants; small business; professionals; regional leaders |
Step-by-step: (1) Identify each group’s resources (money, arms, legitimacy, organization). (2) Identify their fears (reprisal, loss of property, foreign domination). (3) Identify their “red lines” (what they will not accept). (4) Predict defections: revolutions accelerate when swing groups shift.
Putting It Together: A Minimal Classification Checklist
1) Is there mass participation beyond elites? (low/medium/high) Evidence: ________
2) Are there competing claims to legitimacy? (yes/no) Evidence: ________
3) Is there institutional redesign underway? (low/medium/high) Evidence: ________
4) Which causal drivers are present (A–E)? A__ B__ C__ D__ E__
5) Which outcomes are changing (1–4)? Regime__ Property/Labor__ Inclusion__ International__