Putting It Together: Predicting Images and Light Paths in Mixed Systems

A unified workflow for mixed optical systems

Mixed systems combine multiple “rule sets” in one path: reflection at mirrors, refraction at flat or curved interfaces, imaging by lenses/mirrors, and intensity changes from polarization elements. The key skill is not memorizing more facts, but choosing the right rule at the right interface and keeping a consistent sign/direction story from start to finish.

The four-step workflow (use this every time)

1. Draw the setup with interfaces labeled. Mark each surface the ray can meet (mirror, lens, flat boundary, curved boundary, polarizer). Add normals at likely hit points. Indicate media (air, glass, water) and their refractive indices if known.

2. Choose a small set of “control rays.” Use 2–3 rays that are easy to track and that reveal the image location or beam direction. In mixed systems, you often track a ray bundle (chief ray + marginal ray) rather than every possible ray.

3. Process interfaces in order. At each interface, apply exactly one primary rule: reflection law, Snell’s law (or TIR test), lens/mirror imaging relation, or polarization transmission rule. Write down what changes: direction, convergence/divergence, image distance, or intensity.

4. Run diagnostic checks after each step. Ask: “Is the bend direction correct?”, “Is the image real/virtual consistent with the next element?”, “Could TIR occur here?”, “Does magnification sign/size make sense?”, “Does polarization reduce intensity as expected?”

   Continue in our app.

   • Listen to the audio with the screen off.
   • Earn a certificate upon completion.
   • Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

   Or continue reading below...

   

   Download the app

Interface-by-interface decision tree

When a ray reaches a surface, decide what you’re looking at before doing math.

• Mirror surface: use reflection. If curved, you may switch to an imaging equation approach for paraxial rays, but you can still reason with local normals for direction.

• Flat boundary between media: use Snell’s law; check for TIR if going from higher to lower index.

• Curved boundary (e.g., air–glass spherical surface): treat as refraction with a changing normal. For small angles near the axis, you can approximate with paraxial reasoning; otherwise, track the normal at the hit point carefully.

• Thin lens element: treat as a single imaging step (object distance → image distance) and then propagate rays to the next element.

• Polarizer / analyzer: direction usually unchanged (ideal sheet), but intensity changes based on relative polarization angle. Place it in the sequence where it physically sits.

Quick diagnostic questions (keep these in the margin)

• Direction check: entering higher index should bend toward the normal; entering lower index bends away. If your sketch shows the opposite, fix it before calculating.

• TIR check: only possible when going from higher index to lower index and the incident angle exceeds the critical angle. If the ray is going from air into glass, TIR cannot happen at that boundary.

• Image plausibility: if an element is converging, it should not make a collimated beam diverge more (unless the object is inside the focal length, producing a virtual image).

• Size/magnification check: if the image is closer to a converging lens than the object (in the real-image regime), the magnification magnitude should typically be less than 1; if the image is farther away, magnification magnitude tends to be greater than 1.

• Polarization check: two polarizers at 90° should ideally block almost all light; at 0° they transmit the most. If your result violates that, revisit angle definitions.

Guided problem-solving tasks (multi-step reasoning)

Task 1: Lens + plane mirror “double pass” image prediction

Setup: An object is placed in front of a converging lens. A plane mirror is placed behind the lens, perpendicular to the axis, so light passes through the lens, reflects, and passes through the lens again back toward the object side.

Step-by-step reasoning

1. Draw and label: Object → lens → mirror → lens (return). Mark the lens focal points on both sides. Mark the mirror as a plane.

2. First pass through the lens: Treat the object as the “object” for the lens and find the intermediate image location (real or virtual). This intermediate image is where rays would converge (or appear to diverge from) before hitting the mirror.

3. Reflection at the plane mirror: A plane mirror forms a virtual image of whatever is in front of it at the same distance behind it. Use the intermediate image as the “object” for the mirror. Reflect its position across the mirror plane to get the mirror’s image of that intermediate image.

4. Second pass through the lens: Now treat the mirror-produced image as the “object” for the lens on the return trip. Compute the final image location on the object side.

5. Diagnostic checks: (a) If the mirror is moved slightly, does the final image shift in the expected direction? (b) Does the final image end up on the object side (it should, since rays return)? (c) Does the system behave like increased optical power (two passes through the lens) in terms of convergence?

Common pitfall: forgetting that the “object” for the second lens pass is not the original object but the mirror’s image of the intermediate image.

Task 2: Refraction at a flat window + lens focusing (ray direction consistency)

Setup: A camera lens looks through a flat glass window at a distant scene. The window is tilted slightly relative to the lens axis.

Step-by-step reasoning

1. Identify interfaces: Air → glass (front surface), glass → air (back surface), then lens.

2. Choose control rays: Use the chief ray from a distant point (approximately collimated) and one marginal ray.

3. Apply Snell’s law at the first surface: Entering glass (higher index) bends toward the normal. Because the window is tilted, the normal is tilted; the ray direction changes.

4. Apply Snell’s law at the second surface: Exiting to air bends away from the normal. For a parallel-sided plate, the outgoing ray is parallel to the incoming ray but laterally shifted (for the same incident angle). With tilt, the “parallel” statement still holds relative to the original incoming direction if the two surfaces are parallel.

5. Feed the shifted ray into the lens: The lens now receives a beam that is laterally displaced. That can cause the image to shift on the sensor (like a small prism effect) even if focus distance is similar.

6. Diagnostic checks: (a) If the plate is removed, the image should shift back. (b) If the plate thickness increases, lateral shift increases. (c) If you accidentally predict a change in outgoing angle for a parallel plate, re-check your normals and Snell steps.

Task 3: Curved interface + TIR test (can the ray escape?)

Setup: A ray travels inside a glass sphere (index n) and hits the glass–air boundary at some point off-axis. Will it refract out or undergo total internal reflection?

Step-by-step reasoning

1. Draw the local normal: For a sphere, the normal at the hit point is the radius line from the center to the point of incidence.

2. Measure the incident angle: The incident angle is between the ray direction and the normal (inside the glass).

3. TIR eligibility check: Since the ray goes from glass (higher n) to air (lower n), TIR is possible in principle.

4. Compare to critical angle: If the incident angle exceeds the critical angle, the ray reflects internally; otherwise it refracts out.

5. Diagnostic checks: (a) Near the center hit (small incident angle), escape is likely. (b) Near grazing incidence (large incident angle), TIR is more likely. (c) If your sketch shows the ray bending toward the normal when exiting to air, that’s incorrect—fix before deciding TIR.

Task 4: Adding polarization into a geometric path (intensity bookkeeping)

Setup: Unpolarized light reflects off a dielectric surface at an angle, then passes through a polarizer, then through a second polarizer (analyzer) before reaching a detector.

Step-by-step reasoning

1. Geometric path first: Use reflection to find the outgoing direction. Keep the geometry separate from intensity at first.

2. Mark polarization axes: Define the plane of incidence at the reflection and the transmission axis of each polarizer.

3. Account for polarization state after reflection: Reflection can partially polarize light depending on angle and material. Even without computing Fresnel coefficients, you can reason that the reflected light is generally not “randomly polarized” anymore at oblique incidence.

4. Apply polarizer transmission: The first polarizer selects the component along its axis. The second polarizer transmits based on the relative angle between axes.

5. Diagnostic checks: (a) If the analyzer is rotated to 90° relative to the first polarizer, intensity should drop strongly. (b) If you swap the order of the two polarizers, the result should be the same (ideal polarizers). (c) If you predict increased intensity after adding a polarizer, revisit your component reasoning.

Consistency tools: keep your reasoning from drifting

1) The “ray budget” table

For multi-step systems, track each ray with a small table: where it is, what medium it’s in, and what rule applies next.

2) “Real vs virtual” handoff rule

When one element produces an image that becomes the object for the next element, decide whether rays actually converge at that location (real) or only appear to diverge from it (virtual). This affects where you place the object for the next element:

• Real intermediate image: treat it as a physical object point emitting rays onward from that location.

• Virtual intermediate image: treat it as a point behind the element from which rays appear to originate; the next element sees rays that are still diverging, as if from that point.

3) “Bend direction” micro-check for refraction

Before calculating angles, do a 2-second qualitative check:

• Going into higher index: ray bends toward the normal, so the refracted angle is smaller than the incident angle.

• Going into lower index: ray bends away from the normal, so the refracted angle is larger (unless TIR occurs).

Mini-projects (hands-on integration)

Mini-project 1: Design a simple periscope (mirror geometry + alignment)

Goal: Build a periscope that lets you see over an obstacle using two plane mirrors.

Materials

• Two small flat mirrors

• Cardboard tube/box (rectangular cross-section helps)

• Tape, ruler, craft knife (adult supervision as needed)

Step-by-step build and reasoning

1. Choose the offset height: Decide how far you want to “look over” (e.g., 20–30 cm). This sets the separation between the two mirrors.

2. Set mirror angles: Mount each mirror at 45° to the tube axis, facing each other. The top mirror turns incoming horizontal rays downward; the bottom mirror turns them horizontal toward your eye.

3. Draw the ray path: Sketch one ray from the scene into the top opening, reflect down, reflect out. Use equal angles about the normal at each mirror.

4. Alignment diagnostics: If the view is clipped, your openings are too small or mirrors are not centered. If the image seems rotated or shifted, check that both mirrors are parallel to each other and both are at 45°.

5. Optional polarization extension: Add a linear polarizer sheet at the eyepiece. Rotate it while looking at glare sources; note intensity changes without changing the geometric path.

Mini-project 2: Pinhole vs lens camera comparison (image formation trade-offs)

Goal: Compare how a pinhole and a lens form images on a screen/sensor, focusing on sharpness, brightness, and depth of field.

Materials

• Two identical boxes (or one box with interchangeable front plates)

• Aluminum foil + needle (pinhole)

• A simple converging lens (magnifying glass works)

• Tracing paper or wax paper as a screen

Step-by-step procedure and reasoning

1. Build the pinhole camera: Make a small clean pinhole in foil, mount it on the front. Place the screen at the back.

2. Build the lens camera: Replace the pinhole with the lens. Allow the screen position to slide to find focus.

3. Compare brightness: The lens camera should be much brighter because it collects a wider cone of rays. If it’s not, the lens may be too small or the screen is far from focus.

4. Compare sharpness vs depth of field: The pinhole often gives a “mostly in focus” but dim image; the lens gives a brighter image but requires correct focus distance.

5. Consistency checks: (a) If you move the screen in the lens camera, the image should pass through a sharp focus position. (b) If you enlarge the pinhole, brightness increases but sharpness decreases—if your observation contradicts this, check for multiple holes or torn foil.

Mini-project 3: Analyze a common optical device with a mixed-system map

Goal: Pick one device and produce a “mixed-system map” that lists elements in order and what each does to rays and images.

Option A: Flashlight reflector (curved mirror + source placement)

1. Identify elements: LED/filament source, curved reflector (often approximated as parabolic), front cover (may be a window or weak lens).

2. Ray reasoning: Rays from a source near the reflector’s focal region reflect into a more collimated beam. If the source is too far forward/back, the beam diverges or converges.

3. Diagnostic questions: Does the beam get tighter when you move the bulb position? If yes, you’re moving toward the correct focal placement. If the beam has rings/artifacts, consider that the reflector is not ideal or the source is extended.

Option B: Bathroom mirror (flat reflection + glass layer effects)

1. Identify elements: Air → glass front surface (weak reflection), glass → metallic coating (strong reflection), then back out through glass.

2. Ray reasoning: You can get a faint “ghost” image from the front surface reflection plus the main image from the coated back surface. The separation depends on glass thickness and viewing angle.

3. Diagnostic questions: Can you see a double image of a small bright point? Does the separation grow with angle? If your model predicts no ghosting, you likely ignored the first air–glass reflection.

Option C: Eyeglasses (lens imaging + reflections + polarization)

1. Identify elements: Lens surfaces (refraction), possible anti-reflection coatings (reduce reflections), and optional polarized sunglasses layer (intensity control).

2. Ray reasoning: The lens changes vergence so the eye can focus. Surface reflections can create faint secondary images; polarization can reduce glare from horizontal surfaces.

3. Diagnostic questions: If you rotate polarized sunglasses while looking at glare, does brightness change strongly? If not, the glare source may be unpolarized or you may be looking at a different reflection geometry than expected.