Planning a Journalist’s Interview: Building a Question Ladder

What a “Question Ladder” Is (and Why It Works)

A question ladder is an interview plan that deliberately moves from low-friction questions to higher-stakes accountability questions. You begin with context and comfort, then invite narrative, then drill into specifics, then test claims and verify, and finally wrap up with clarity and next steps. The “ladder” metaphor matters: each rung is designed to earn the next one. If you jump straight to confrontation, you often lose detail, cooperation, and credibility; if you stay too broad, you miss proof and responsibility.

In practice, a ladder does three things at once:

• Controls pacing: you decide when to widen (get the story) and when to narrow (get the facts).
• Builds a record: narrative first, then specifics, then verification creates a clean chain of evidence.
• Creates built-in follow-ups: each rung has default probes that keep you from accepting vague answers.

The Five Phases of an Interview Plan

Phase 1: Warm-up (Context + Rapport Without Wasting Time)

Warm-up questions are not “small talk.” They are functional: they establish roles, timelines, and the interview frame while helping the source settle into speaking clearly.

Goals:

• Confirm basic context (who/what/when/where).
• Set expectations (topics, time, on/off record boundaries if applicable).
• Get the source talking in complete sentences.

Warm-up question types (examples):

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• Role and scope: “What is your role in this situation, day to day?”
• Timeline anchor: “When did you first become aware of the issue?”
• Definitions: “When you say ‘resolved,’ what does ‘resolved’ mean operationally?”
• Process overview: “Walk me through how decisions like this are normally made.”

Default warm-up follow-ups: “Who else was involved?” “What documents or records reflect that?” “What changed after that point?”

Phase 2: Narrative (Let Them Tell the Story—Then Shape It)

Narrative questions invite a coherent account. Your job is to get a full arc before you start interrupting with details. This produces a map you can later test.

Goals:

• Capture the source’s version in their own words.
• Identify key scenes, decisions, and claims to verify later.
• Surface names, dates, locations, and stated reasons.

Narrative prompts (examples):

• “Start at the beginning. What happened, step by step?”
• “Take me through that day from when you arrived to when you left.”
• “What was the goal at the start, and how did it change?”
• “What did you understand the risks to be at the time?”

Built-in narrative follow-ups:

• “What did you see next?”
• “What happened immediately after that?”
• “Who was present when that was decided?”
• “What did you do then?”

Phase 3: Detail Drilling (Turn the Story Into Checkable Facts)

Once you have a narrative, you narrow. Detail drilling converts general statements into specifics you can verify: times, numbers, exact wording, sequences, and decision points.

Goals:

• Pin down specifics (dates, amounts, locations, policies, communications).
• Separate observation from interpretation.
• Create a precise timeline and responsibility map.

Detail-drilling question types (examples):

• Time and sequence: “What time was that?” “How long did it last?” “What happened between X and Y?”
• Quantify: “How many?” “How much?” “How often?”
• Exact language: “What exactly was said?” “Do you remember the wording?”
• Documentation: “Where is that recorded?” “Is there an email, memo, log, or report?”
• Decision mechanics: “Who had authority to approve it?” “What criteria were used?”

Precision follow-ups that keep answers from staying vague:

• “Can you be more specific—what number are we talking about?”
• “Which date?”
• “Which location exactly?”
• “Who, by name?”
• “What did you personally observe versus what you were told?”

Phase 4: Challenge / Verification (Accountability Without Losing Control)

This phase tests claims, resolves contradictions, and asks for responsibility. It works best after you’ve gathered the narrative and details—so your challenges are anchored in what the source already said, and in specific points that matter.

Goals:

• Verify key claims (“How do you know?”).
• Confront discrepancies calmly and precisely.
• Clarify responsibility, decision rationale, and consequences.

Challenge/verification question types (examples):

• Evidence check: “How do you know that?” “What’s your basis for that statement?”
• Source of knowledge: “Did you witness it, or did someone tell you?”
• Contradiction: “Earlier you said X, but you also said Y. Help me understand which is accurate.”
• Accountability: “Who made the final decision?” “What responsibility do you personally accept?”
• Alternative explanation: “What would someone who disagrees with you say happened?”
• Impact: “Who was affected, and how was that assessed at the time?”

Neutral phrasing that keeps the door open:

• “Walk me through the reasoning there.”
• “What information did you have then that you didn’t have before?”
• “What would you point to as proof?”

When the source refuses or deflects:

• “What part can you answer?”
• “Who can answer it?”
• “What would need to happen for you to be able to answer?”
• “Is your position that you don’t know, or that you can’t say?”

Phase 5: Wrap-up (Lock In Clarity and Next Steps)

Wrap-up is where you prevent misunderstandings and capture what’s missing. You also give the source a final chance to add context—without letting them rewrite the interview.

Goals:

• Confirm key facts and quotes.
• Identify missing documents, names, and dates.
• Clarify what happens next and who to contact.

Wrap-up questions (examples):

• “What’s the most important detail you think people misunderstand about this?”
• “What did I not ask that I should have asked?”
• “Which records would best support your account?”
• “Who else should I speak with to understand this fully?”
• “To confirm: the timeline is A, then B, then C—did I get that right?”

The Question Ladder Model (Broad to Specific, With Built-In Follow-Ups)

Use this model as a template. You can adapt the subject matter, but keep the structure: broad prompt → narrative → specifics → verification → accountability.

How to Build Your Ladder: A Practical Step-by-Step

Step 1: Write the “spine” questions (one per phase)

Draft one essential question for each phase. These are your non-negotiables—the interview still works if you only get these.

• Warm-up spine: role + timeline anchor
• Narrative spine: step-by-step account
• Detail spine: key decision point + key metric
• Challenge spine: evidence basis + contradiction check
• Wrap-up spine: confirmation + next sources/records

Step 2: Add two follow-ups per spine question

Pre-write follow-ups that force specificity. Good default probes are short and reusable.

• Sequence: “What happened next?”
• Specifics: “Which date/time?” “How many?”
• Attribution: “How do you know?”
• Responsibility: “Who approved it?”

Step 3: Mark “must-get” items vs “nice-to-get”

Label each question:

• MUST: essential for accuracy, verification, or accountability.
• NICE: adds color, context, or optional detail.

This prevents you from spending limited time on interesting but nonessential tangents.

Step 4: Add time sensitivity tags

Some questions become harder to answer later (memory fades, records disappear, people coordinate). Tag questions as:

• NOW: ask early (e.g., “Who was present?” “What did you see next?”).
• SOON: ask mid-interview (e.g., “Which documents support that?”).
• LATER: can wait (e.g., broader reflections, lessons learned).

Step 5: Plan your “pivot lines” between phases

Transitions keep the interview smooth and signal why you’re narrowing.

• From narrative to detail: “I want to slow down and make sure I have the sequence right.”
• From detail to challenge: “I’m going to ask a few questions to verify what we’ve covered.”
• From challenge to wrap-up: “Before we finish, I want to confirm a few key points and what I should check next.”

Mini-Examples: One Topic, Five Phases

Below is a sample ladder for a hypothetical public incident (adapt the structure, not the subject).

Warm-up

• “What was your role that day?”
• Follow-up: “Were you the decision-maker, or implementing someone else’s decision?”

Narrative

• “Walk me through what happened from the moment you arrived.”
• Follow-ups: “What did you see next?” “Who spoke first?”

Detail drilling

• “At what time did the key action occur?”
• Follow-ups: “How do you know the time?” “Is it in a log or message?”

Challenge/verification

• “You said the decision was based on safety—what specific information supported that at the time?”
• Follow-ups: “Who provided that information?” “What would contradict it?”

Wrap-up

• “To confirm: you arrived at X, spoke with Y, then Z happened—correct?”
• Follow-ups: “Who else should I speak with?” “What record best supports your account?”

Worksheet: Arrange Questions by Priority and Time Sensitivity

Copy this worksheet into your notes before an interview and fill it in. Keep it visible during the conversation so you can steer back to MUST/NOW items if time tightens.

Optional Add-on: A 15-Minute Timebox Plan

If you have limited time, pre-allocate minutes by phase and attach your MUST questions to each block.

• Warm-up: 2 minutes (role + timeline anchor)
• Narrative: 5 minutes (full walk-through)
• Detail drilling: 4 minutes (two key specifics)
• Challenge/verification: 3 minutes (evidence basis + one contradiction)
• Wrap-up: 1 minute (confirm + next sources/records)

Write your MUST questions next to each block so you can skip NICE questions without losing the backbone of the interview.