Why “Mood” Matters: Meaning, Not Just Grammar
In real Spanish communication, the choice between indicative and subjunctive is less about “correct conjugation” and more about the speaker’s stance toward the information. Think of mood as the speaker’s label on the message: Is this presented as a fact? (indicative) or as a non-fact—a wish, possibility, evaluation, or imagined scenario (subjunctive)?
Both moods can talk about the same topic, but they frame it differently. Compare:
- Indicative: Sé que viene. (I know he’s coming. Presented as a fact.)
- Subjunctive: No creo que venga. (I don’t think he’s coming. Presented as uncertain.)
Notice that the “coming” is the same event, but the speaker’s certainty changes the mood in the second clause.
The Core Contrast in One Sentence: Assertion vs Non-Assertion
A practical way to decide mood in everyday speech is to ask: Am I asserting this information as real/true in my message?
- If you are asserting it (you treat it as information you stand behind), you typically use indicative.
- If you are not asserting it (you treat it as desired, doubted, evaluated, hypothetical, or not yet real), you typically use subjunctive.
This “assertion test” helps you handle many situations that feel confusing when you only memorize lists of expressions.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...
Download the app
Step-by-Step Decision Process (Fast, Conversation-Friendly)
Step 1: Identify the two parts (main clause + “que” clause)
Most mood contrasts appear in structures like: [Main clause] + que + [verb]. The main clause sets the speaker’s stance; the second clause contains the action/event.
- Creo (main stance) + que + tiene razón (event)
- Es posible (main stance) + que + tenga razón (event)
Step 2: Ask: “Am I presenting the second clause as a fact?”
If yes, choose indicative. If no, choose subjunctive.
- Está claro que tiene razón. (It’s clear—asserted as fact.)
- No está claro que tenga razón. (Not clear—non-asserted.)
Step 3: Check for negation, questions, and “filters”
Negation and questions often change whether the speaker asserts the information. Compare:
- Creo que es verdad. (I believe it’s true → asserted.)
- No creo que sea verdad. (I don’t believe it’s true → not asserted.)
- ¿Crees que es verdad? (Often indicative because the speaker treats it as a real possibility and asks for your stance.)
- ¿No crees que es verdad?
In many real conversations, questions with creer/pensar lean indicative because the speaker is asking you to confirm a proposition. But in some contexts, questions can also be non-assertive and take subjunctive, especially when the question implies doubt or is rhetorical in a way that removes commitment. The key is still stance: is the speaker committing to the truth of the embedded clause or not?
High-Impact Contrast Set #1: “I think” vs “I don’t think”
In daily Spanish, one of the most frequent mood switches is with verbs of opinion. The same verb can flip mood depending on whether it asserts or blocks assertion.
Affirmative opinion (often indicative)
- Creo que tienes razón.
- Pienso que va a llover.
- Me parece que es tarde.
Negative opinion (often subjunctive)
- No creo que tengas razón.
- No pienso que vaya a llover.
- No me parece que sea tarde.
Communication effect: the indicative versions sound like you’re giving information; the subjunctive versions sound like you’re withholding commitment or actively rejecting the claim.
High-Impact Contrast Set #2: “It’s true/obvious” vs “It’s not true/obvious”
Impersonal expressions are common in meetings, emails, and discussions because they sound less personal and more objective. Many of them strongly assert (indicative) or remove assertion (subjunctive).
Assertion (indicative)
- Es verdad que hay un problema.
- Es obvio que no funciona.
- Está claro que necesitamos más tiempo.
Non-assertion (subjunctive)
- No es verdad que haya un problema.
- No es obvio que funcione.
- No está claro que necesitemos más tiempo.
Practical tip: if the phrase sounds like a stamp of certainty (clear/obvious/true), it tends to assert → indicative. If you negate it or weaken it (not clear/not obvious), you remove the stamp → subjunctive.
High-Impact Contrast Set #3: “I know” vs “I don’t know”
Knowledge verbs are powerful because they directly encode certainty. In everyday speech, they create a sharp mood contrast.
Knowledge asserted (indicative)
- Sé que estás ocupado.
- Sabemos que llega mañana.
- Es cierto que tienen experiencia.
Knowledge blocked (subjunctive)
- No sé si estás ocupado. (Often uses si + indicative in real speech.)
- No sé que… (rare/unnatural; Spanish prefers no sé si or no sé qué.)
- No sé si viene / si viene mañana.
Important real-communication note: with no sé si, Spanish commonly uses indicative because the speaker is considering a real-world possibility and simply lacks information. Subjunctive can appear in some varieties or nuanced contexts, but for most learners, no sé si + indicative is the reliable conversational default.
When Both Moods Are Possible (and Meaning Changes)
Some structures allow either mood, and the difference is not “right vs wrong” but what you imply. These are high-value because they show how Spanish uses mood to communicate attitude.
1) “Aunque” (even though / even if)
Indicative tends to refer to something the speaker treats as real/known. Subjunctive tends to refer to something hypothetical, unknown, or not confirmed.
- Aunque tiene poco tiempo, viene. (He does have little time—fact.)
- Aunque tenga poco tiempo, viene. (Even if he has little time—hypothetical/unknown.)
2) “Cuando / en cuanto / hasta que” (future reference)
In real communication, mood often depends on whether the action is viewed as completed/known vs pending. If the time clause points to a future event that hasn’t happened yet, Spanish frequently uses subjunctive in that clause.
- Te llamo cuando llego. (I call you when I arrive—can sound like a routine or scheduled fact in some contexts.)
- Te llamaré cuando llegue. (I will call you when I arrive—arrival is pending.)
- Esperamos hasta que termina. (We wait until he finishes—can describe a habitual pattern.)
- Esperaremos hasta que termine. (We will wait until he finishes—pending.)
Communication effect: subjunctive here signals “not yet realized,” which is extremely common in planning, promises, and instructions.
3) Relative clauses: “the person who…” (known vs unknown)
Spanish uses mood to show whether you are talking about a specific, known person/thing (indicative) or an unknown/nonexistent/desired one (subjunctive).
- Busco a la persona que trabaja en recepción.
- Busco a una persona que trabaje en recepción.
In the first, you likely have a specific receptionist in mind. In the second, you are looking for someone with that role/ability, not a specific known individual.
Mini-Dialogues: How Mood Sounds in Real Life
At work: reporting vs evaluating
A: Está claro que faltan datos. B: Sí, y no es seguro que podamos cerrar hoy.
Here, faltan datos is presented as a fact; podamos cerrar is uncertain.
With friends: belief vs doubt
A: Creo que Juan está en casa. B: No creo que esté; me dijo que salía.
Same event (Juan being at home), different stance.
Customer service: policy vs possibility
A: Es cierto que la garantía cubre esto. B: Perfecto. Pero no es posible que lo cambiemos hoy; necesitamos autorización.
One clause asserts policy; the other blocks immediate action as not possible.
Practical Drills: Convert Meaning by Switching Mood
Use these as speaking drills. Say the indicative version first (assertion), then switch to subjunctive by changing the stance (negation, uncertainty, or hypothetical framing). Focus on meaning change, not just verb form.
Drill 1: Opinion flip
- Pienso que es buena idea. → No pienso que sea buena idea.
- Me parece que tienes razón. → No me parece que tengas razón.
Drill 2: Certainty vs uncertainty
- Es evidente que funciona. → No es evidente que funcione.
- Está claro que llegan hoy. → No está claro que lleguen hoy.
Drill 3: Known vs unknown person
- Necesito el documento que está en tu carpeta. (Specific document.)
- Necesito un documento que esté firmado. (Any document meeting the condition.)
Common Communication Mistakes (and How to Fix Them)
Mistake 1: Using subjunctive just because there is “que”
Que is not the trigger; the speaker’s stance is. Compare:
- Digo que viene. (I say he’s coming—assertion/report.)
- No digo que venga. (I’m not saying he’s coming—non-assertion.)
Mistake 2: Forgetting that negation can flip the mood
Many learners keep the same mood after adding no. Train yourself to re-run the “assertion test” after negation.
- Es cierto que tienen tiempo. → No es cierto que tengan tiempo.
Mistake 3: Treating “maybe” as always subjunctive
Spanish has multiple ways to express possibility. Some commonly take indicative, especially when the speaker treats it as a realistic guess:
- Quizás llega tarde. / Quizás llegue tarde.
- Tal vez es verdad. / Tal vez sea verdad.
Both moods can appear; the difference is subtle: indicative often sounds like a more grounded guess, subjunctive like a more open possibility. In conversation, you’ll hear both. If you want a safe strategy: use subjunctive when you want to emphasize uncertainty; use indicative when you’re leaning toward it being true.
Real-World Templates You Can Reuse
These templates help you produce correct mood choices quickly in speaking and writing. Replace the bracketed parts with your content.
Template A: Asserted information (indicative)
Está claro que + [indicative]. (It’s clear that…)Es verdad que + [indicative]. (It’s true that…)Creo que + [indicative]. (I think that…)Examples:
- Está claro que no tenemos suficiente presupuesto.
- Creo que podemos hacerlo hoy.
Template B: Blocked assertion (subjunctive)
No está claro que + [subjunctive]. (It’s not clear that…)No creo que + [subjunctive]. (I don’t think that…)No es seguro que + [subjunctive]. (It’s not certain that…)Examples:
- No está claro que sea la mejor opción.
- No creo que lleguen a tiempo.
Template C: Future pending time clause (subjunctive in the time clause)
[Future/command] + cuando/en cuanto/hasta que + [subjunctive].Examples:
- Te escribiré cuando tenga noticias.
- Salimos en cuanto termines.
- No lo firmes hasta que lo revisemos.
Quick Self-Check: What Are You Communicating?
Before choosing mood, ask one of these quick questions:
- Am I stating this as information I accept as true? → indicative
- Am I distancing myself from its truth (doubt/denial/uncertainty)? → subjunctive
- Is it not yet real (pending future in a time clause)? → subjunctive in that clause
- Am I describing a specific known person/thing? → indicative in the relative clause
- Am I looking for any person/thing that fits a condition (unknown/nonexistent)? → subjunctive in the relative clause
