Integration Concepts for Logistics Teams: Interfaces, APIs, and EDI

What “integration” means for logistics teams

Integration is how two or more systems exchange data so work can flow without retyping, spreadsheets, or manual status checks. In logistics, integrations usually connect ERP, WMS, TMS, carrier networks, eCommerce platforms, customer portals, and partner systems. Your role as a logistics team is not to design the technical solution, but to define: (a) what business event should trigger data exchange, (b) what information must be included, (c) how fast it must arrive, and (d) what should happen when something goes wrong.

1) Integration patterns: point-to-point, hub-and-spoke, iPaaS

Pattern A: Point-to-point (direct connection)

Concept: System A connects directly to System B. Example: WMS sends shipment confirmation directly to ERP.

• When it works well: Few systems, stable partners, limited number of interfaces.
• Risks: Each new partner adds another “custom pipe.” Over time, changes become slow and costly because one change can impact many direct connections.
• What to ask: “If we add 10 new carriers/customers, how many new connections do we build and maintain?”

Pattern B: Hub-and-spoke (integration hub / middleware)

Concept: Systems connect to a central hub that routes and transforms messages. Example: ERP, WMS, and TMS all connect to a hub; the hub translates formats and distributes updates.

• When it works well: Multiple systems and partners; you want consistent monitoring and centralized error handling.
• Risks: The hub becomes critical infrastructure; governance and ownership must be clear.
• What to ask: “Who owns the hub operations, monitoring, and after-hours support?”

Pattern C: iPaaS (Integration Platform as a Service)

Concept: A cloud-based integration platform with prebuilt connectors, mapping tools, monitoring dashboards, and workflow automation. Often used to connect SaaS systems and external partners faster.

• When it works well: You need speed, scalability, and easier onboarding of new partners; you want visibility into failures without deep technical access.
• Risks: Subscription cost; connector limitations; you still need clear requirements and data ownership.
• What to ask: “Do you have connectors for our WMS/TMS/ERP versions and our carrier/EDI network?”

Practical step-by-step: choosing a pattern (business view)

1. List systems and partners that must exchange data (internal + external).
2. Count interfaces you expect in 12–24 months (include growth, acquisitions, new 3PLs, new marketplaces).
3. Define critical flows (order release, ASN, shipment confirmation, inventory update) and required latency.
4. Decide where you need visibility: Do operations need a dashboard to see stuck messages?
5. Decide who will run it: internal IT, vendor managed service, or shared responsibility.
6. Use these answers to guide whether direct connections are enough or a hub/iPaaS is justified.

2) Message types and triggers logistics teams should define

Most integration problems happen because teams agree on “we’ll integrate orders and shipments” but do not define exact triggers and message content. Below are common logistics message types and what to clarify.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Order release (ERP/eCommerce → WMS/TMS/3PL)

• Trigger options: order created; order approved; payment captured; wave released; ship date reached.
• Business questions: Can orders be changed after release? If yes, how are changes sent (change message vs cancel/recreate)?
• Operational impact: Wrong trigger can create premature picking or missed same-day cutoffs.

ASN (Advance Ship Notice) (Supplier/3PL → WMS/ERP)

• Trigger options: shipment packed; trailer sealed; departed origin; appointment scheduled.
• Business questions: Do we need carton-level detail, pallet-level detail, or just item quantities? Do we need lot/serial/expiry?
• Operational impact: ASN quality drives receiving speed, dock planning, and appointment adherence.

Shipment confirmation / proof of shipment (WMS/TMS/3PL → ERP/Customer)

• Trigger options: label printed; loaded; shipped; carrier pickup scanned.
• Business questions: What is the “ship moment” for invoicing and customer notifications? What tracking number format is required?
• Operational impact: Early confirmation can cause billing disputes; late confirmation can delay invoicing and customer service updates.

Inventory update (WMS/3PL → ERP/eCommerce)

• Trigger options: transaction-based (every receipt/pick/adjustment); periodic snapshots; threshold-based (when below reorder point).
• Business questions: Which inventory types matter (available, allocated, damaged, on-hold)? What is the “available to promise” rule?
• Operational impact: Latency can cause overselling, backorders, or unnecessary expediting.

Practical step-by-step: define a message in one page

1. Name the message (e.g., “Order Release”).
2. Define the trigger in plain language (e.g., “when order is approved and ready to pick”).
3. Define required fields (must-have vs nice-to-have).
4. Define timing (e.g., “within 2 minutes of approval” or “hourly batch”).
5. Define acknowledgments (how you know it was received and accepted).
6. Define exceptions (what happens if address invalid, SKU unknown, quantity mismatch).

3) EDI vs API vs flat files: strengths, limitations, and logistics use cases

Actionable guidance: choosing the right method

• If a large customer mandates EDI: treat it as a compliance project; define document scope, testing, and chargebacks risk.
• If you need fast operational decisions: prefer APIs for tracking, inventory availability, and shipment creation.
• If the partner is small or systems are limited: flat files can be acceptable, but require strict templates, naming conventions, and reconciliation.

Vendor/IT questions to clarify early

• “Which integration methods are supported out-of-the-box: EDI, API, SFTP flat files? Which require custom work?”
• “Do you provide an EDI translator/mapping service or do we need a third party?”
• “For APIs, what are the rate limits, authentication method, and uptime SLA?”
• “How do you handle version changes so our integrations don’t break?”

4) Batch vs real-time: tradeoffs and latency impacts on operations

Batch

Concept: Data is sent on a schedule (e.g., every 15 minutes, hourly, nightly) or as a file drop.

• Pros: simpler; can be cheaper; reduces load on systems; good for non-urgent updates.
• Cons: latency; larger “blast radius” if a batch fails; harder to pinpoint which record caused failure.
• Operational examples: nightly inventory snapshots can cause overselling during promotions; hourly order drops can miss same-day cutoffs.

Real-time (or near real-time)

Concept: Data is sent immediately when an event occurs (often via API or event messaging).

• Pros: faster decisions; better customer visibility; reduces manual expediting.
• Cons: requires stronger monitoring; failures must be handled quickly; can increase complexity and cost.
• Operational examples: real-time shipment confirmation enables immediate invoicing and customer notifications; real-time inventory reduces oversell risk.

Latency: how to translate “minutes” into business impact

• Order latency: If orders arrive 60 minutes late, you may miss wave planning, labor scheduling, and carrier cutoffs.
• Inventory latency: If availability updates lag, customer promise dates become unreliable and cancellations rise.
• Tracking latency: If tracking events lag, customer service contacts increase and proactive exception management fails.

Practical step-by-step: define latency requirements

1. Pick the process (e.g., order release to WMS).
2. Identify the decision it enables (e.g., same-day shipping cutoff at 3:00 PM).
3. Set a maximum acceptable delay (e.g., “orders must arrive within 5 minutes of approval”).
4. Define business hours vs after-hours (e.g., real-time 6 AM–10 PM, batch overnight).
5. Define what happens during outages (queue messages, manual fallback, or hold processing).

5) Data mapping basics and error handling (business view)

Data mapping: what it is

Data mapping is aligning fields between systems so both sides interpret the same meaning. Even when two systems share a field name like “SKU” or “Ship Date,” the rules may differ. Business teams should validate meaning, units, and identifiers—not just field presence.

Mapping checklist: fields, units, identifiers

• Identifiers: order number, shipment ID, tracking number, customer ID, location/warehouse code, carrier code, item/SKU, carton/pallet IDs.
• Units of measure: each vs case vs pallet; weight (lb/kg); dimensions (in/cm); temperature units if applicable.
• Dates/times: time zone; format; business meaning (requested ship date vs promised delivery date vs actual ship date).
• Status codes: “shipped,” “picked,” “loaded,” “delivered,” “canceled”—ensure both sides use the same definitions.
• Address standards: country codes, state/province, postal code formats; validation rules.

Common mapping pitfalls in logistics

• One SKU, multiple pack sizes: WMS expects eaches; ERP sends cases.
• Warehouse codes mismatch: “DC01” vs “01” leads to inventory posted to the wrong location.
• Carrier/service levels: “UPS_GROUND” vs “GND” causes label failures or wrong freight charges.
• Partial shipments: one order becomes multiple shipments; ensure the ERP can accept split confirmations.

Error handling: define what operations will do

Errors are normal. What matters is whether they are visible, routed to the right team, and recoverable without creating duplicates.

• Detect: How will we know an interface failed (dashboard, email alert, ticket)?
• Classify: Is it a data issue (bad address), a setup issue (unknown SKU), or a system outage?
• Recover: Can messages be retried automatically? Can a corrected record be resent without duplicating shipments?
• Own: Who fixes what—operations, customer service, master data team, IT, vendor?
• Audit: Is there a message log showing what was sent, when, and the response?

Practical step-by-step: define an “error playbook” for one interface

1. List top 10 likely errors (unknown SKU, invalid address, missing UOM, carrier code invalid, duplicate order).
2. Assign an owner per error type (business owner + backup).
3. Define the action (correct data in source system, correct in target system, resend message, cancel and recreate).
4. Define time-to-respond (e.g., critical within 30 minutes during shipping hours).
5. Define escalation (when to involve IT/vendor; after-hours rules).

6) Testing approach from a business perspective

Business-led testing ensures integrations support real operations, not just “messages that technically pass.” You are verifying that the right work happens in the warehouse, transportation planning, billing, and customer communication.

A. Happy path testing (normal scenarios)

• Standard order flows end-to-end: order release → pick/pack/ship → shipment confirmation → invoice trigger (if applicable).
• Standard ASN receipt: ASN received → appointment/dock plan → receiving matches expected quantities.
• Inventory update: inventory changes in WMS reflect correctly in downstream systems.

B. Exception path testing (what breaks in real life)

• Order change after release (quantity, address, ship method).
• Short ship / backorder / partial shipment.
• Substitution (if allowed), damaged inventory, cycle count adjustments.
• Carrier label failure or service level not available.
• Duplicate message received (system retry) and how duplicates are prevented.

C. Volume and peak testing (stress the process, not just the system)

• Peak order volume (e.g., promotion day) with realistic mix of SKUs and destinations.
• Peak ASN volume (multiple inbound loads) and receiving throughput.
• Peak tracking events (many shipments updating at once).
• Batch window constraints (e.g., nightly batch must finish before 5 AM).

Practical step-by-step: business test plan for an integration

1. Define test objectives (e.g., “prevent overselling,” “support same-day shipping cutoff”).
2. Create test scenarios across happy/exception/volume categories.
3. Prepare test data (realistic SKUs, UOMs, addresses, carrier services, locations).
4. Define expected results in each system (what should appear, what status should change, what should not happen).
5. Run tests with timestamps to measure latency and identify bottlenecks.
6. Log defects in business terms (impact, severity, workaround) and confirm fixes with retesting.

Sample integration requirement questions (to ask vendors and IT)

Scope and patterns

• “Which systems are the source of truth for orders, inventory, and shipments in this design?”
• “Is this point-to-point, hub-based, or iPaaS? Why is that the best fit for our expected growth?”
• “How many interfaces are included in the proposal, and what is the cost for adding another partner later?”

Triggers, timing, and SLAs

• “What exactly triggers each message (order release, ASN, shipment confirmation, inventory update)?”
• “What is the expected end-to-end latency during business hours and during peak?”
• “What uptime and support coverage do we have (including after-hours)?”

Data content and mapping

• “Can you provide a field-level mapping document for each interface?”
• “How are units of measure handled (case vs each), and where is conversion performed?”
• “Which identifiers must be consistent across systems (SKU, location, carrier codes), and who maintains them?”

Error handling and monitoring

• “How will operations know an interface failed, and what is the standard response process?”
• “Do messages queue and retry automatically? How do we prevent duplicates?”
• “Do we have a searchable message log with payloads, timestamps, and responses?”

Security and access (non-technical phrasing)

• “How is access controlled so only approved partners/systems can send or receive data?”
• “Can we restrict by partner, warehouse, or business unit?”
• “How are sensitive fields handled (customer contact details, pricing if included)?”

Change management

• “If we change a field or add a new requirement, what is the process and lead time?”
• “How are changes tested and deployed without disrupting operations?”
• “How do you handle partner onboarding and certification (especially for EDI)?”

Interface inventory template (copy/paste)

Use this to create a complete view of your current and planned integrations. Keep it in a shared document so operations, IT, and vendors work from the same list.

Mini examples: turning operations needs into integration requirements

Example 1: Same-day shipping cutoff

• Operational need: Orders approved by 3:00 PM must ship same day.
• Integration requirement: Order Release message must be delivered to WMS within 5 minutes of approval; failures must alert operations within 10 minutes.
• Test: Approve 50 orders at 2:55 PM; verify they appear in WMS by 3:00 PM and are eligible for wave/pick.

Example 2: Prevent overselling during promotions

• Operational need: Website must reflect available inventory quickly.
• Integration requirement: Inventory updates must include available/allocated/on-hold and refresh every 1–5 minutes during promo windows (or real-time per transaction).
• Test: Simulate 500 orders/hour and inventory adjustments; verify site availability matches WMS within agreed latency.

Example 3: Faster receiving with ASNs

• Operational need: Receiving team wants carton-level detail to reduce manual counting.
• Integration requirement: ASN must include carton IDs and item quantities per carton; ASN must arrive before appointment time; mismatches must create a visible exception.
• Test: Send ASN with 2 cartons missing; verify WMS flags discrepancy and receiving workflow is clear.