What “documentation new hires actually use” means
Onboarding documentation is useful when it helps a new hire complete real work with minimal guessing. That means it must be (1) easy to find at the moment of need, (2) current enough to trust, and (3) action-oriented—written as steps, examples, and decision points rather than broad descriptions.
- Easy to find: one obvious starting point, consistent navigation, predictable naming.
- Current: clear ownership, review dates, change log, and a process for updates.
- Action-oriented: task-based guides, checklists, screenshots, and “what to do when it goes wrong.”
Structuring an onboarding hub (single source of truth)
An onboarding hub is a central page (or portal) that routes new hires to the right resources without forcing them to search across tools. The hub should be the default link shared in welcome messages and pinned in team channels.
Recommended hub structure
- Start here: a short “How to use this hub” note and a list of the first 5–10 tasks.
- Role-specific paths: links grouped by role or function (e.g., Support, Sales, Engineering, Operations).
- Core tools: access/setup guides for the tools the team uses daily.
- Workflows: how work moves through the team (requests, approvals, handoffs).
- People & escalation: who to ask, how to escalate, and response expectations.
- Reference: glossary, FAQs, templates, examples, and policies relevant to day-to-day work.
- What changed: a small “recent updates” section to build trust that docs are maintained.
Step-by-step: build the hub in 60–90 minutes
- Choose the home location (one tool only): your wiki/knowledge base, intranet, or shared drive landing page.
- Create a single “Onboarding Hub” page and pin it where new hires already look (team chat, bookmarks, intranet tiles).
- Add a “Start Here” block with 5–10 links to the most common first-week tasks (e.g., tool access, submitting a request, finding templates).
- Group links by tasks, not departments (e.g., “Run a customer call” instead of “Customer Success”).
- Standardize page names using a consistent pattern:
[Team] – [Task] – [Tool/Workflow]. - Add an “Owner + last reviewed” line at the top of every linked page.
- Test with a new hire lens: ask someone unfamiliar to find “how to request help” and “how to complete a common task” in under 60 seconds.
Navigation patterns that reduce searching
| Pattern | How it helps | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Task-first categories | Matches what new hires are trying to do | “Submit an expense” vs. “Finance” |
| Consistent templates | Pages feel familiar; scanning is faster | Every guide has “Steps,” “Pitfalls,” “Escalation” |
| Short “Top tasks” list | Reduces cognitive load | Top 10 tasks for first 2 weeks |
| Cross-links to prerequisites | Prevents dead ends | “Before you start: request tool access” |
| Search-friendly titles | Improves findability in any system | Include tool name + task keyword |
Writing task-based guides (docs that drive action)
Task-based guides are the backbone of usable onboarding documentation. Each guide should help a new hire complete one job-to-be-done end-to-end, including what “done” looks like and what to do if something breaks.
Principles for task-based writing
- One page = one task: avoid mixing multiple workflows unless they are tightly coupled.
- Start with the outcome: “You will be able to…” and a definition of success.
- List prerequisites: access, permissions, templates, and required inputs.
- Use numbered steps: each step begins with a verb and includes where to click or what to type.
- Show examples: include a sample ticket, message, or completed form.
- Include decision points: “If X, do Y; if not, do Z.”
- Document pitfalls: common mistakes and how to recover.
Step-by-step: convert a messy doc into a task guide
- Pick the task (e.g., “Create a customer support escalation ticket”).
- Define “done” in one sentence (e.g., “Ticket is created, tagged correctly, and assigned within SLA”).
- List inputs: what information is needed (customer ID, severity, screenshots, logs).
- Write the steps as a numbered list with exact fields and expected values.
- Add a decision tree for common branches (severity levels, customer tier, after-hours).
- Add an example of a good submission and a bad submission.
- Add pitfalls + fixes (permissions errors, missing tags, wrong queue).
- Assign an owner and set a review cadence (e.g., quarterly or after tool changes).
Example: decision logic snippet
If severity = P1 and customer tier = Enterprise: 1) page on-call via Pager tool 2) create escalation ticket 3) notify #incident-room If severity = P2: 1) create escalation ticket 2) notify team channel 3) update customer within 2 hours If severity = P3: 1) create standard ticket 2) add to weekly triageMaintaining FAQs that stay helpful (and don’t become a junk drawer)
FAQs work when they answer recurring questions that block progress. They fail when they become a dumping ground for one-off edge cases or outdated policy fragments.
What belongs in an onboarding FAQ
- Access & permissions: “How do I request access to X?”
- Where to find things: “Where are templates stored?”
- Common process confusion: “When do I use workflow A vs. B?”
- Definitions: acronyms, internal terms, and what they mean in practice.
- Escalation & support: “What do I do if I’m blocked?”
Step-by-step: build and maintain an FAQ
- Start with real questions: collect from chat logs, tickets, and onboarding sessions.
- Write answers as actions: include links to the relevant task guide and the exact next step.
- Tag each FAQ by theme (Tools, Workflow, People, Definitions) to improve scanning.
- Set a rule: if an FAQ answer exceeds 8–10 lines, convert it into a dedicated task guide and link to it.
- Review monthly for the first 3 months after launch, then quarterly.
- Archive aggressively: move outdated items to an “Archived FAQs” page with a date and reason.
FAQ answer format (action-oriented)
- Question: How do I get access to the analytics dashboard?
- Answer: Submit an access request using the “Tool Access” form. Choose role “Viewer,” add your manager as approver, and include the business reason “weekly reporting.” Link: Tool Access Request Guide. If blocked: message #it-help with request ID.
Version control and ownership (so docs don’t rot)
New hires stop using documentation the first time it’s wrong. Prevent doc rot by making ownership visible, changes traceable, and updates easy to request.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...Download the app
Ownership model
- Doc owner: accountable for accuracy and review cadence (often the process owner).
- Contributors: anyone can suggest edits via comments or pull requests.
- Approver (optional): required for high-risk areas (security, compliance, payroll-related processes).
Version control options (choose what fits your tools)
| Approach | Best for | How to implement |
|---|---|---|
| Wiki page history | Most teams | Require “Owner + last reviewed” and a short change note per edit |
| Docs-as-code (Git) | Technical teams | Markdown in repo, PR reviews, tags/releases for major changes |
| Controlled documents | Regulated environments | Formal approvals, locked templates, audit trail, scheduled reviews |
Minimum standards for every onboarding doc page
- Owner: name or role (e.g., “Support Ops Lead”).
- Last reviewed: date.
- Next review: date or cadence (e.g., “Quarterly”).
- Change log: 3–5 recent changes with dates.
- Feedback route: “Report an issue” link or instructions.
Step-by-step: implement a lightweight doc governance loop
- Create a doc register (simple table) listing key pages, owners, and review dates.
- Schedule recurring reviews (15–30 minutes per owner per month/quarter).
- Define triggers for immediate review: tool changes, workflow changes, org changes, recurring onboarding questions.
- Add a “Docs debt” queue: a backlog of needed updates with priority and due date.
- Measure trust: track how often new hires report “doc mismatch” and which pages cause it.
Documentation checklist: what every team should document
Use this checklist to ensure your onboarding documentation covers the essentials new hires need to operate independently.
1) Tools
- Tool purpose (what it’s used for on your team)
- Access request steps + expected approval time
- Roles/permissions explained in plain language
- Setup steps (profiles, notifications, integrations)
- Daily/weekly “must-do” actions (e.g., check queue, update statuses)
- Troubleshooting (common errors, who to contact)
2) Workflows
- End-to-end process steps with “done” definition
- Inputs required and where to find them
- Decision points (when to choose path A vs. B)
- Handoffs (who receives what, in what format)
- SLAs/response expectations where applicable
- Templates and examples of good outputs
3) Escalation and support
- What counts as an escalation (clear criteria)
- Escalation channels (chat, ticketing, phone) and when to use each
- On-call or coverage rules (if applicable)
- What information to include (logs, screenshots, IDs)
- Expected response times and fallback contacts
4) Definitions and “how we talk”
- Glossary of acronyms and internal terms
- Definitions tied to actions (what the term changes in your workflow)
- Examples of correct usage in messages, tickets, and reports
5) Examples and standards
- Examples of well-written tickets/requests
- Examples of good customer/internal messages (tone, structure)
- Quality standards (what “good” looks like)
- Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
Checklist table (copy/paste)
| Area | Documented? | Link | Owner | Last reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tool access & setup | ⬜ | |||
| Core workflows (top 5) | ⬜ | |||
| Escalation paths | ⬜ | |||
| Glossary/definitions | ⬜ | |||
| Examples/templates | ⬜ | |||
| FAQ | ⬜ | |||
| Doc governance (owners/reviews) | ⬜ |
Minimum viable onboarding docs (MVOD) for small teams
Small teams often delay documentation because “we’ll do it later.” MVOD is a pragmatic baseline that supports onboarding without creating a heavy maintenance burden. Start with the smallest set of pages that unlocks independent work, then expand based on repeated questions.
MVOD: the 6 pages to create first
- Onboarding Hub (the router page)
- Tool Access & Setup (all core tools in one place, with links)
- Top 10 Tasks (task guides or links to them)
- How Work Moves (simple workflow map in words: intake → do → review → done)
- Escalation & Help (who/where/when, with examples)
- FAQ + Glossary (short, curated, action-oriented)
Step-by-step: launch MVOD in one week
- Day 1: Create the hub and the MVOD page list (empty pages are fine initially).
- Day 2: Write Tool Access & Setup and Escalation & Help (these prevent early blockers).
- Day 3: Draft Top 10 Tasks as short checklists; convert the top 3 into full task guides.
- Day 4: Write “How Work Moves” with 5–8 bullet steps and links to templates.
- Day 5: Build the FAQ from real questions; add a glossary of the top 20 terms.
- End of week: Assign owners and review dates; announce the hub link and how to request changes.
Rule of thumb for what to document next
- If a question is asked twice, add it to the FAQ.
- If it’s asked three times, create a task guide.
- If it causes a missed deadline, rework, or escalation, prioritize it immediately.
Template: onboarding handbook page layout (copy/paste)
Use this template for every task guide so pages are consistent and scannable. Replace bracketed text with your content.
<h3>[Task name: verb + object, e.g., “Submit a Purchase Request”]</h3> <p><strong>Purpose:</strong> [Why this task exists and when to do it.]</p> <p><strong>Outcome (definition of done):</strong> [What “done” looks like, measurable if possible.]</p> <p><strong>Owner:</strong> [Name/role] | <strong>Last reviewed:</strong> [YYYY-MM-DD] | <strong>Next review:</strong> [cadence/date]</p> <h4>Quick links</h4> <ul> <li>[Link to tool / form / template]</li> <li>[Link to related workflow / policy]</li> <li>[Link to examples]</li> </ul> <h4>Prerequisites</h4> <ul> <li>Access: [Tool name + permission level]</li> <li>Inputs needed: [IDs, files, context]</li> <li>Time estimate: [e.g., 10–15 minutes]</li> </ul> <h4>Steps</h4> <ol> <li>[Step 1: verb-first instruction with exact location/field names.]</li> <li>[Step 2]</li> <li>[Step 3]</li> </ol> <h4>Screenshots / visuals</h4> <ul> <li>Screenshot 1: [What it shows + why it matters]</li> <li>Screenshot 2: [Highlight fields to complete]</li> </ul> <h4>Examples</h4> <ul> <li>Good example: [Paste sample ticket/request/message]</li> <li>Bad example: [Common mistake and why it fails]</li> </ul> <h4>Common pitfalls (and fixes)</h4> <ul> <li>Pitfall: [What goes wrong] → Fix: [What to do]</li> <li>Pitfall: [What goes wrong] → Fix: [What to do]</li> </ul> <h4>Escalation / getting help</h4> <ul> <li>If blocked by access: [Channel + what to include]</li> <li>If urgent: [Who to contact + criteria]</li> </ul> <h4>Change log</h4> <ul> <li>[YYYY-MM-DD] – [What changed] – [Who changed it]</li> </ul>Quality checks: make docs usable before you publish
Usability test (10 minutes)
- Ask someone unfamiliar with the process to follow the guide.
- Observe where they hesitate or switch to asking questions.
- Update the doc to address the first point of confusion (usually missing prerequisites, unclear step wording, or absent examples).
Doc readiness checklist
- Can a new hire find the page from the hub in under 60 seconds?
- Does the page state the outcome and definition of done?
- Are prerequisites explicit (access, inputs, time)?
- Are steps numbered and unambiguous?
- Are there examples and at least one screenshot/visual reference (where helpful)?
- Are common pitfalls and escalation paths included?
- Is ownership and review date visible?