Diversification Basics Using Index Funds and ETFs: What It Covers and What It Doesn’t

What “Diversification” Really Means (and Why Index Funds Help)

Diversification means spreading your exposure so that no single company, industry, country, or type of investment can dominate your results. The goal is to reduce uncompensated risk: risk you take that does not reliably increase expected return (for example, the risk that one company’s accounting scandal sinks your portfolio).

Index funds and ETFs make diversification easier because one fund can hold hundreds or thousands of securities. But diversification is not automatic: you can still end up concentrated if your funds overlap heavily, focus on one sector, or all depend on the same economic driver.

What diversification covers

• Single-company risk: one firm’s failure matters less when it is a tiny slice of a broad index.
• Single-sector risk: spreading across many industries reduces the impact of a downturn in one sector.
• Single-country risk: holding multiple regions reduces reliance on one economy, currency, or political system.
• Single-asset-type risk: mixing stocks and bonds can reduce portfolio swings because they often react differently to the same news.

What diversification does not cover

• Market-wide risk: a broad stock index can still drop sharply in a global recession.
• Inflation and interest-rate shocks: these can affect many assets at once (sometimes both stocks and bonds).
• Behavioral mistakes: diversification cannot stop you from panic-selling or performance-chasing.
• Hidden concentration: multiple ETFs can still be dominated by the same mega-cap stocks, the same country, or the same sector.

Diversification Within an Asset Class: Broad Market vs. Single Sector

Within an asset class (like stocks), diversification is about owning many different companies across industries and styles rather than betting on a narrow slice.

Broad market stock index (more diversified)

A broad market ETF (e.g., “total market” or “all-cap”) typically includes:

• Many sectors (technology, healthcare, financials, industrials, consumer, energy, etc.)
• Many company sizes (large, mid, small)
• Many business models and revenue sources

This reduces the chance that one theme dominates your outcome.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Single-sector ETF (more concentrated)

A sector ETF (e.g., “technology” or “energy”) can hold dozens or even hundreds of stocks, but it is still concentrated because:

• All holdings depend on similar economic drivers
• Regulatory or commodity shocks can hit the whole sector at once
• Valuations can move together (crowded trades)

Practical check: “How many independent bets am I making?”

Use this quick checklist before adding a new stock ETF:

• Coverage: Is it broad market, or a narrow slice (sector, theme, single factor)?
• Top holdings: Do the top 10 holdings make up a large percentage of the fund?
• Sector weights: Is one sector unusually dominant?
• Style tilt: Is it heavily growth, value, dividend, small-cap, etc.?

Even a “broad” ETF can be top-heavy if a few mega-cap stocks dominate the index.

Diversification Across Regions: Domestic vs. International

Regional diversification means your portfolio is not tied to the fortunes of a single country’s economy, currency, and political/regulatory environment.

Domestic-only exposure: what you get and what you miss

A domestic total-market ETF can be very diversified across companies and sectors within that country, but it still concentrates you in:

• One currency
• One central bank’s interest-rate regime
• One legal/regulatory system
• One country’s sector mix (some markets are tech-heavy; others are finance- or commodity-heavy)

International exposure: what it adds

Adding international stocks can diversify:

• Economic cycles: different regions can grow at different times
• Sector composition: some industries are more represented outside your home market
• Currency exposure: foreign currencies can rise or fall versus your home currency

International diversification does not guarantee higher returns every year; it aims to reduce reliance on one country’s outcome.

Practical step-by-step: a simple “region coverage” audit

1. List your equity ETFs (ignore bonds for this step).
2. Write down each fund’s region label (Domestic, Developed ex-Domestic, Emerging Markets, Global).
3. Estimate your equity split by region using your target weights (or current weights).
4. Identify single-country risk: If nearly all equity is domestic, note what risks you are accepting (currency, policy, sector mix).
5. Identify gaps: If you have no international exposure, you are missing non-domestic companies and currencies.

Diversification Across Asset Classes: Stocks vs. Bonds

Asset-class diversification is about combining investments that can behave differently. The most common pairing in a simple long-term portfolio is stocks and high-quality bonds.

How stocks and bonds tend to differ

• Stocks: higher expected long-term growth, larger short-term swings.
• Bonds (especially high-quality): typically lower volatility, can help cushion stock declines, and can provide a more stable return path.

This is not a guarantee. Bonds can fall too, especially when interest rates rise. But mixing the two can reduce the chance that your entire portfolio moves in the same direction at the same time.

Practical step-by-step: classify each holding by “job”

1. Make two columns: Growth (Stocks) and Stabilizer (Bonds/Cash-like).
2. Place each ETF in a column based on what it primarily holds.
3. Check for accidental stock-like behavior: Some “income” or “dividend” ETFs are still 100% stocks.
4. Check bond type: Government vs. corporate, short vs. long duration, inflation-linked vs. nominal. Different bond types can behave differently.

The key is not the number of funds, but whether the funds represent meaningfully different exposures.

Correlation in Plain Language (and Why It Matters)

Correlation describes how two investments tend to move relative to each other.

• High positive correlation: they often rise and fall together. Holding both may not reduce risk much.
• Low correlation: their movements are more independent. This can smooth the overall ride.
• Negative correlation: they often move in opposite directions. This can reduce volatility even more (though negative correlation is not constant over time).

In practice: if you own two ETFs that are both dominated by the same large companies or the same sector, they may behave very similarly even if their names look different.

Why “more holdings” can still mean “not diversified”

You can own five ETFs and still be concentrated if:

• They overlap heavily (same top holdings repeated across funds).
• They share the same risk driver (e.g., all are growth-oriented, all tech-heavy, or all tied to one country’s currency).
• They exclude major parts of the market (e.g., no small caps, no international, no bonds).

Guided Activity: Spot Overlap, Country Concentration, and Missing Exposures

Below are two hypothetical ETFs. Your task is to identify (1) overlap risks, (2) single-country concentration, and (3) missing exposures. Treat this like a portfolio “x-ray.”

Hypothetical ETF A: US Large-Cap Growth ETF

Hypothetical ETF B: Global “Innovation Leaders” ETF

Step 1: Identify overlap risk (holdings-level concentration)

Action: Circle any repeated top holdings across ETF A and ETF B.

• Repeated names in the samples: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet (and possibly others).

Interpretation: Even though the ETFs have different labels (US growth vs. global innovation), they may deliver very similar performance because the same mega-cap stocks dominate both. The combined portfolio could end up with an even larger effective weight in those few companies.

Quick overlap test you can do with real ETFs:

• Compare the top 10 holdings lists side-by-side.
• If 5+ names overlap, expect high similarity.
• If both have top-10 weights above ~40–50%, concentration risk is likely high.

Step 2: Identify single-country concentration (region-level concentration)

Action: Note each ETF’s country exposure.

• ETF A: 100% United States.
• ETF B: 70% United States (despite being “global”).

Interpretation: Holding both likely results in a portfolio that is still heavily US-driven. “Global” in the name does not necessarily mean balanced global exposure.

Practical check: Look for a “Country breakdown” section in the fund facts. If one country is above 60–70%, you may still have meaningful single-country concentration.

Step 3: Identify missing exposures (what you don’t own)

Action: List what is underrepresented or absent if your equity portfolio is mainly ETF A + ETF B.

• Missing or light: value stocks, small caps, broad non-tech sectors (industrials, utilities, energy, materials), many non-US companies, and potentially emerging markets beyond a small slice.
• Not addressed at all: bonds (if these are your only holdings), which means no dedicated stabilizing asset class.

Interpretation: You may have many holdings on paper (120 + 60), but your portfolio’s outcome could still hinge on a narrow growth/tech-driven segment of the market.

Step 4: Write a one-paragraph “diversification diagnosis”

Use this template and fill it in based on the two ETFs:

My portfolio is diversified across (companies/sectors/regions/asset classes) in these ways: _____. It is still concentrated in: _____. The main overlap risk is: _____. The main single-country risk is: _____. Key missing exposures are: _____. 

Optional extension: propose one change that improves diversification

Without choosing specific tickers, describe one adjustment that would reduce concentration:

• Within stocks: replace or pair a theme/sector ETF with a broad-market equity index.
• Across regions: add a broad international equity index if you are heavily domestic.
• Across asset classes: add a high-quality bond index to introduce a different return driver.