Why Decision Memos Matter in Bayesian Work
A Bayesian analysis is only useful if it changes what someone does. Decision memos are the bridge between probabilistic outputs and an operational choice: ship, pause, investigate, allocate budget, change policy, or run another test. A good memo makes the decision legible: it states the decision, the stakes, the alternatives, what uncertainty remains, and what you recommend doing next. It also prevents a common failure mode in analytics: a technically correct model that produces an ambiguous narrative, leaving stakeholders to argue from intuition anyway.
In practice, decision memos also create institutional memory. Weeks later, people forget the plot but remember the decision. A memo captures what you believed at the time, what evidence you used, and what you expected to happen. That makes it possible to learn from outcomes, improve forecasting, and audit whether the organization is systematically overconfident or overly cautious.
A Practical Template: One-Page Decision Memo (Executive-First)
Section 1: Decision Statement (One Sentence)
Start with a single sentence that names the decision owner, the action, and the timing. Example: “This week, the Growth lead should roll out Variant B to 100% of traffic on mobile in the US.” If the decision is not an action but a commitment, say so: “Approve a $250k quarterly budget increase for retention offers.” Avoid “We analyzed…” as the first line; the memo is about the decision, not the analysis.
Section 2: Recommendation and Rationale (Three Bullets)
Give the recommendation immediately, then the minimal rationale. A useful pattern is three bullets: (1) what you recommend, (2) why it is expected to be better in business terms, (3) what risk remains and how you will manage it. Keep the rationale in decision language: expected impact, downside risk, and constraints. If the recommendation depends on a threshold (risk tolerance, budget cap, safety constraint), state that threshold explicitly.
Section 3: What We Know (Decision-Relevant Quantities)
List the 3–6 quantities that directly drive the decision. These are not model parameters for their own sake; they are inputs to action. Examples: expected incremental revenue per user, probability that the change reduces churn by at least X, probability that latency exceeds a limit, expected number of support tickets, or expected regret under each option. Use plain language labels and include units. If you must include technical terms, define them in place.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...
Download the app
Section 4: What We Don’t Know (Key Uncertainties and Assumptions)
Enumerate the uncertainties that could flip the decision. This section is where Bayesian work shines: you can be explicit about uncertainty without sounding evasive. Separate “uncertainty from limited data” (wide posterior) from “uncertainty from assumptions” (model structure, measurement issues, selection bias, non-stationarity). For each assumption, state how it could fail and what direction it would bias the decision.
Section 5: Options Considered (Including the Status Quo)
Always include the status quo as an option, plus at least one alternative. For each option, give a short description and the operational cost (engineering time, risk, opportunity cost). This prevents the memo from becoming a sales pitch for the analysis. If there are constraints (legal, brand, safety), note which options are infeasible and why.
Section 6: Decision Table (Show the Tradeoffs)
Include a compact table that compares options on the same decision metrics. This is the “what to show” core: a single view that makes the tradeoffs obvious. Keep it small enough to read in a meeting. If you include uncertainty, do it consistently across rows (for example, median and 80% interval, or expected value and downside quantile). Avoid mixing metrics that are not comparable.
Option | Expected value (weekly) | Downside (10th pct) | P(meets guardrail) | Operational cost | NotesThe exact columns depend on the decision, but the structure should be stable across memos so stakeholders learn how to read it.
What to Say: Language That Helps Decisions
Use Action Verbs and Time Bounds
Decision memos should read like instructions, not like research notes. Use verbs like “roll out,” “pause,” “cap,” “allocate,” “deprecate,” “monitor,” “escalate,” and “re-run.” Add time bounds: “for two weeks,” “until we hit 50k sessions,” “before the next release.” Time bounds turn uncertainty into a plan.
Translate Probability Into Operational Risk
Stakeholders rarely need to hear “posterior distribution” in a memo. They need to understand risk. Instead of “There is a 22% probability the effect is negative,” say “Roughly 1 in 5 chance this change hurts the KPI; if we ship, we should cap exposure and monitor daily.” Pair probabilities with what you will do about them (mitigation), otherwise the number feels abstract.
Separate Evidence From Preference
A memo should distinguish what the data suggests from what the organization prefers. For example: “Evidence suggests Option A has higher expected value; however, Option B reduces downside risk and aligns with the Q1 reliability goal.” This prevents debates where people argue about numbers when they are actually arguing about risk tolerance or strategy.
State the Decision Rule You Are Using
Even if the rule is informal, state it. Examples: “We ship if the probability of harming churn is below 10%,” or “We choose the option with the highest expected value subject to the latency guardrail.” Without a decision rule, stakeholders may interpret the same results differently and the memo becomes a Rorschach test.
What to Show: Visuals and Tables That Earn Their Space
The “Decision Snapshot” Box
Include a small box near the top with the 3–4 numbers that matter most. For example: expected incremental profit, probability of meeting a guardrail, worst-case (downside) impact at a chosen percentile, and recommended rollout plan. This helps executives who skim and helps technical reviewers verify that the memo is internally consistent.
One Distribution Plot, Not Five
If you include a plot, choose one that directly answers the decision question. Commonly, this is a distribution of incremental value (in dollars) or a distribution of KPI change with a marked threshold. Annotate it with the decision threshold and the probability mass on each side. Avoid showing multiple similar plots that differ only in styling; they dilute attention and invite bikeshedding.
Show Guardrails Explicitly
Guardrails (latency, error rate, complaints, safety events) should be shown as constraints, not as afterthoughts. If the decision requires “do no harm” on a metric, show the probability of violating that constraint and the expected severity if it happens. If guardrails are measured noisily, say so and specify how you will monitor after shipping.
Show Sensitivity Only Where It Can Change the Decision
Sensitivity analysis is valuable, but in a decision memo it should be targeted. Show a small “break-even” calculation: what assumption would need to be true for the recommendation to flip? Example: “If the average order value is 15% lower than assumed, Option A no longer dominates.” This focuses discussion on the few uncertainties worth resolving.
Step-by-Step: Writing a Decision Memo From Your Bayesian Output
Step 1: Identify the Decision Owner and the Decision Date
Write down who will decide and when. If there is no owner, the memo will drift. If there is no date, the memo becomes a report. Put the owner and date in the first paragraph or header area of your internal template.
Step 2: List the Options (Including “Do Nothing”)
Create a short list of feasible actions. Keep it to 2–4 options when possible. If there are many variants, group them into decision-relevant bundles (for example, “ship now,” “ship with ramp,” “hold and collect more data”). Each option should be operationally distinct.
Step 3: Map Each Option to Outcomes and Costs
For each option, list the outcomes that matter (revenue, churn, risk events, time-to-market) and the costs (engineering, opportunity cost, reputational risk). This mapping is where many memos fail: they jump from model output to recommendation without specifying what “better” means in business terms.
Step 4: Convert Model Output Into Decision Metrics
Take your posterior samples or predictive outputs and compute the quantities that correspond to the outcomes and costs. Examples include expected incremental profit, probability of exceeding a KPI threshold, or a downside quantile. Keep the computation reproducible and consistent across memos so stakeholders can compare decisions over time.
Step 5: Build the Decision Table
Populate a single table with one row per option and a small set of columns. Choose columns that reflect value, risk, and constraints. If you include intervals, choose one interval width and stick to it. Add a “notes” column for operational considerations that are not captured by the model (dependencies, rollout complexity, compliance).
Step 6: Write the Recommendation With a Rollout and Monitoring Plan
Recommendations are stronger when they include how to implement safely. If uncertainty remains, propose a ramp plan: start with a small exposure, monitor guardrails, then expand. Specify what you will monitor, how often, and what triggers a rollback. This turns uncertainty into a controlled experiment in production rather than a binary leap.
Step 7: Pre-Mortem the Decision
Add a short “If this goes wrong, why?” section. List 2–3 plausible failure modes: measurement drift, novelty effects, segment-specific harm, unmodeled constraints, or operational incidents. For each, specify an early warning signal. This is not pessimism; it is risk management and it increases trust in the memo.
Two Ready-to-Use Memo Templates
Template A: Product/Experiment Decision Memo
Use this when deciding whether to ship a feature, choose a variant, or change a user flow.
Decision: [Owner] will [action] by [date].
Recommendation: [Ship / ramp / hold].
Why: Expected impact on [primary KPI] is [direction], with [risk statement].
Guardrails: Probability of violating [guardrail] is [x%]; mitigation: [plan].
Decision table: (options vs expected value, downside, guardrail probability, effort).
Assumptions that matter: [Top 3], and what would change the decision.
Rollout & monitoring: Ramp schedule, dashboards, rollback triggers.
Open questions: What you would measure next if you delay.
Template B: Forecast/Planning Decision Memo
Use this for budgeting, staffing, inventory, capacity, or risk planning.
Decision: [Owner] will set [budget/capacity/plan] for [period] by [date].
Recommendation: Choose [Plan A/B/C] with [buffer level].
Key forecast outputs: Expected demand, high-percentile demand (for capacity), probability of shortfall, expected cost of overage/underage.
Decision table: (plan vs expected cost, worst-case cost, service level probability).
Operational constraints: Lead times, hiring limits, supplier constraints.
Monitoring & re-plan cadence: Weekly/monthly update schedule and triggers.
Common Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)
Pitfall 1: Burying the Decision Under Methodology
If the first half of the memo explains the model, stakeholders will decide before they reach the recommendation. Put the decision and recommendation first. Move methodological details to an appendix or a linked technical note. In the main memo, include only what is needed to trust the decision: data source, key assumptions, and checks that affect reliability.
Pitfall 2: Reporting Uncertainty Without a Plan
Saying “there is uncertainty” is not actionable. Pair uncertainty with a control: ramp, monitor, add a guardrail, or collect targeted data. If you cannot propose a control, then the memo should recommend delaying the decision or choosing a safer option.
Pitfall 3: Mixing Metrics and Losing the Business Thread
Memos often list many KPIs (conversion, revenue, retention, NPS, latency) without explaining how they trade off. Choose a primary objective and a small set of guardrails. If tradeoffs are real, make them explicit in the decision table and state which metric wins when they conflict.
Pitfall 4: Over-Precision and False Certainty
Numbers like “$12,347.19 per week” signal spurious accuracy. Round to decision-relevant precision (for example, nearest $1k or $10k) and focus on ranges and probabilities. Precision should match the noise in the system and the scale of the decision.
Pitfall 5: Hiding Assumptions That Drive the Result
Every analysis has assumptions; the pitfall is pretending it doesn’t. If a key assumption is doing most of the work, surface it and show how the decision changes if it is wrong. Stakeholders are usually comfortable with assumptions when they are explicit and testable.
Pitfall 6: Not Defining the Counterfactual
“Variant B is better” is meaningless unless you specify “better than what” and under what conditions. Define the baseline (current experience, current policy, current forecast) and ensure the decision table compares each option to the same baseline. If the baseline is changing (seasonality, competitor actions), note that and adjust the decision date or monitoring plan.
Pitfall 7: Ignoring Segment Risk
A change can be positive on average but harmful for a critical segment (high-value customers, new users, a region, a device type). If segment harm would be unacceptable, show segment-level risk in a controlled way: not a long list of subgroup charts, but a focused check on the segments that matter operationally. If you cannot reliably estimate segment effects, propose a rollout that limits exposure for sensitive segments.
Pitfall 8: Confusing “Statistically Interesting” With “Decision-Relevant”
Analysts may include results because they are intellectually satisfying (parameter correlations, model comparisons) rather than because they affect the choice. Use a strict filter: if a figure or statistic cannot change the decision, it does not belong in the main memo.
Pitfall 9: No Accountability Loop
A decision memo should make it possible to learn. If you do not specify what you expect to happen, you cannot evaluate whether the decision process is improving. Include a small “expected outcome” statement and a date to review. This is not a conclusion; it is part of the operational plan.
Checklist: Before You Send the Memo
Decision clarity: Is the decision statement one sentence with an owner and date?
Recommendation upfront: Can a reader find the recommended action in 10 seconds?
Decision table present: Are options compared on the same metrics and units?
Uncertainty is actionable: Does each major uncertainty have a mitigation or monitoring plan?
Guardrails: Are constraints explicit, quantified, and tied to rollback triggers?
Assumptions: Are the assumptions that could flip the decision clearly listed?
Operational realism: Are effort, dependencies, and timelines acknowledged?
Readable: Is jargon minimized and are numbers rounded appropriately?
