Counteroffers and Offer Strategy: Concede, Hold, or Trade

Three Responses to an Offer: Accept, Counter, or Reject

When an offer arrives, your job is to help your client choose the response that best protects their goals while keeping the deal alive when it makes sense. Tactically, every response answers two questions: (1) Is this offer acceptable as written? (2) If not, what change(s) would make it acceptable, and what are you willing to trade to get them?

Accept

• Use when: the offer meets the client’s minimum requirements and the risk profile is acceptable.
• Watch for: “accepting” while assuming you can renegotiate later. If a term matters, address it now.

Counter

• Use when: the offer is close, or you want to test whether the other side will move without losing momentum.
• Goal: improve the package while keeping the other party engaged.

Reject (or let it expire)

• Use when: the offer is far from workable, contains unacceptable risk, or the other side is not negotiating in good faith.
• Practical note: “Reject” can be a clean no, or a no paired with guidance (e.g., “Seller will not consider offers with X contingency”).

Counteroffer Mechanics: What Actually Happens

A counteroffer is typically a rejection of the original offer and a new offer with revised terms. That means:

• One signature does not mean a deal until both sides sign the same set of terms (including all addenda).
• Each counter resets the acceptance decision for the receiving party.
• Deadlines matter: a counter can include an expiration time to control pace and reduce drift.

Counter formats you can use

• Single counteroffer: one clean set of changes. Best for clarity.
• Counter + addendum: counter changes plus a separate addendum clarifying timelines, repairs, or credits.
• Multiple-counter strategy (use sparingly): presenting two alternative counters (e.g., higher price with credit vs. lower price without credit). This can work, but it increases confusion and the chance the other side cherry-picks incompatible terms.

Common Counteroffer Pitfalls (and How to Avoid Them)

Pitfall: Multiple counters that create ambiguity

If you send “Option A” and “Option B,” the other side may accept pieces of each. Prevent this by labeling each option as a complete package and stating that acceptance must be of one full option only.

Seller Counter: Buyer may accept either Option A or Option B in full. Partial acceptance or mixing terms is not accepted.

Pitfall: Unclear terms (especially credits, repairs, and timelines)

Vague language causes disputes later. Replace “seller to fix items” with specific scope, caps, and deadlines. Replace “credit for repairs” with exact dollar amounts and where the credit applies (closing costs, prepaid items, etc., per local contract norms).

• Bad: “Seller to repair roof.”
• Better: “Seller to provide licensed roofer repair receipt for active leak at rear valley; work completed prior to appraisal/inspection deadline; not to exceed $X; if not completed, seller to credit $X at closing.”

Pitfall: Countering too many items at once

Over-countering can make you look unreasonable and gives the other side too many reasons to walk. Prioritize the few terms that move the needle most.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Pitfall: Countering without a decision rule

“Let’s counter and see” is not a strategy. Before you counter, define: (1) your must-haves, (2) your nice-to-haves, (3) your walk-away points, and (4) what you will trade to get movement.

Pitfall: Ignoring the other side’s likely constraints

Some terms are constrained by lender rules, appraisal risk, or buyer cash-to-close. If you counter into an impossible corner, you waste time and lose leverage. Use targeted questions (through the other agent) to test feasibility before drafting.

A Template Approach: Separate “Money Terms” from “Certainty Terms”

To make counter decisions faster and cleaner, split the offer into two buckets. This helps you trade intelligently instead of conceding randomly.

Money Terms (value)

• Purchase price
• Seller credits (closing costs, rate buydown, repairs credit)
• Earnest money amount (also a certainty lever, but often treated as financial commitment)
• Personal property included/excluded
• HOA transfer fees or other cost allocations (as allowed)

Certainty Terms (risk and speed)

• Contingencies (inspection, appraisal, financing, sale of buyer’s property)
• Contingency timelines and removal deadlines
• Closing date and possession terms
• Proof of funds / lender pre-approval strength
• Repair limits, access, and re-inspection rights
• Escalation clause structure (if used)

How to use the split in practice

Start by ranking certainty terms first when your client’s priority is speed and low risk; rank money terms first when the client can tolerate time/risk for a higher net. Then build a counter that improves your top priorities while offering the other side a path to yes.

Step-by-Step: A Tactical Decision Process for Responding

Step 1: Translate the offer into your client’s “net and risk” snapshot

• Net: price minus credits and expected seller-paid items.
• Risk: likelihood of fall-through (financing strength, appraisal exposure, contingencies).
• Timeline: how the dates align with your client’s needs.

Step 2: Identify the top 3 issues (not 10)

Force prioritization. Typical top issues are: (1) price/credit, (2) appraisal/financing certainty, (3) inspection scope/timelines, (4) closing/possession.

Step 3: Choose your posture: Concede, Hold, or Trade

• Concede: give the term as requested because it’s low-cost to you and high-value to them (rarely done without getting something back; see trade strategy).
• Hold: keep the term unchanged because it protects a must-have or prevents unacceptable risk.
• Trade: move on a term only in exchange for value (money or certainty).

Step 4: Build a counter package (not a single-issue counter)

A strong counter is a coherent package that tells a story: “We can do X if you do Y.” Package thinking prevents accidental giveaways and reduces back-and-forth.

Step 5: Add clarity and guardrails

• Use exact numbers and dates.
• Include an expiration time when appropriate.
• Confirm which documents are incorporated (addenda, disclosures, proof of funds).

Step 6: Pre-brief the other agent (when allowed and appropriate)

Before sending, communicate the intent: “We’re improving certainty by tightening inspection timeline; we’re also moving on price if appraisal risk is reduced.” This reduces misinterpretation and speeds acceptance.

Trade Strategy: Never Give a Concession Without Receiving Value

Concessions are not “nice”; they are currency. The clean rule: every concession should buy something—speed, reduced risk, fewer repairs, stronger commitment, or a higher net.

Common trades that work

• Price concession in exchange for shorter inspection period and higher earnest money.
• Seller credit in exchange for as-is inspection (information only) or repair cap.
• Flexible closing date in exchange for higher price or waived minor contingencies.
• Including personal property in exchange for removing a request for credits.

How to phrase trades clearly

If Seller agrees to a $5,000 closing cost credit, Buyer agrees to: (a) shorten inspection contingency to 5 days, (b) limit repair requests to health/safety items with a $1,500 cap, and (c) increase earnest money to $X within 1 business day of acceptance.

Prioritizing Issues: A Simple Scoring Method

When emotions run high, use a quick scoring method to keep decisions rational. Score each issue 1–5 for impact and 1–5 for probability (chance it causes failure or cost). Multiply for a priority score.

Counteroffer Packages: Samples Tailored to Goals

Use these as frameworks. Adjust to local contract language and your client’s priorities.

Seller Goal: Maximize Net (willing to tolerate some time)

Situation: Buyer offers below list with a large credit request and standard contingencies.

• Money terms: Counter price to $X (closer to list); reduce credit to $Y.
• Certainty terms: Keep standard financing contingency but require proof of funds for down payment and closing costs within 24 hours.
• Trade logic: “We reduce the credit if you raise price; we’ll keep timelines reasonable if you show ability to close.”

Counter Package A (Seller Net Focus): Price: $X. Seller credit: $Y. Buyer to provide updated pre-approval and proof of funds within 24 hours. Closing date: unchanged. Inspection: standard, but repair requests limited to health/safety items or $Z cap.

Seller Goal: Certainty and Speed (job relocation, already under contract elsewhere)

Situation: Buyer offers near list but with long contingency timelines and low earnest money.

• Money terms: Accept price (or small increase).
• Certainty terms: Shorten inspection period; increase earnest money; tighten financing timeline; add earlier appraisal ordering requirement if your contract allows.
• Trade logic: “We’ll meet you on price if you reduce fall-through risk.”

Counter Package B (Seller Certainty Focus): Price: accepted at $X. Earnest money: increase to $E and deposit within 1 business day. Inspection contingency: 5 days. Financing contingency: approval deadline shortened to Y days. Closing: on or before [date].

Seller Goal: Avoid Repairs and Post-Inspection Renegotiation

Situation: Buyer is price-strong but likely to negotiate hard after inspection.

• Money terms: Hold price.
• Certainty terms: Limit repair requests to major systems/health-safety; set a repair cap or credit cap; specify no cosmetic items.
• Trade logic: “We’re giving you the house at this price; in return, we need inspection to be informational or tightly bounded.”

Counter Package C (Repair-Control): Price: $X. Inspection: Buyer may inspect, but Seller will only consider repairs for health/safety items; total Seller obligation not to exceed $Z (repair or credit at Seller’s choice). No requests for cosmetic items.

Buyer Goal: Win in a Competitive Situation Without Overpaying Blindly

Situation: Buyer wants a strong offer but fears appraisal issues and unknown repairs.

• Money terms: Strong price with a defined appraisal gap coverage amount (if appropriate for the buyer’s cash position).
• Certainty terms: Short inspection timeline; limit repair requests; flexible closing date.
• Trade logic: “We’re offering certainty and speed; in return, we want a clean acceptance without extra seller demands.”

Counter Package D (Buyer Competitive): Price: $X. Appraisal gap: Buyer will cover up to $G above appraised value. Inspection: 5 days, repair requests limited to health/safety items. Closing: flexible between [date range].

Buyer Goal: Preserve Cash (needs closing cost help)

Situation: Buyer can pay the price but needs seller credit for closing costs.

• Money terms: Offer higher price paired with a seller credit (within lender limits).
• Certainty terms: Strengthen financing documentation; shorten timelines to compensate for the credit request.
• Trade logic: “We’ll improve your net price headline and reduce your risk if you help with cash-to-close.”

Counter Package E (Buyer Cash Preservation): Price: $X (higher). Seller credit: $Y toward allowable closing costs. Buyer to provide proof of funds for appraisal gap/cash reserves. Inspection: 7 days with repair cap $Z. Closing: on [date].

Buyer Goal: Time to Coordinate Move (needs longer closing or rent-back)

Situation: Buyer needs a later closing; seller wants certainty.

• Money terms: Offer a modest price increase or cover specific seller costs.
• Certainty terms: Strong earnest money; early contingency removal; clear possession terms (rent-back rate, deposit, duration) if permitted.
• Trade logic: “We’re asking for time; we’ll pay for it and reduce your risk.”

Counter Package F (Timeline Trade): Closing: [later date] OR rent-back for N days at $R/day with deposit $D. Earnest money: $E. Inspection: 5 days. Price: $X + $P (or Buyer pays specific fee/cost).

Using Expiration Times and “Next-Step” Instructions

Expiration times can protect your client from being tied up while other opportunities exist. Use them to control momentum, not to posture.

• Good use: “Counter expires at 5:00 PM tomorrow” when you have showings/offers expected.
• Risky use: extremely short deadlines that trigger defensiveness unless you truly can move on.

Add next-step instructions to reduce friction:

• List required documents (proof of funds, updated pre-approval).
• State how acceptance should be delivered (signed counter + initials on addenda, per local practice).
• Confirm key dates that start upon acceptance (inspection day 1, deposit due date).

Quick Reference: Counteroffer Drafting Checklist

• Package clarity: Are you countering as a coherent bundle?
• Money terms: Price, credits, and cost allocations stated as exact numbers.
• Certainty terms: Contingencies and timelines are specific and enforceable.
• Trade integrity: Did every concession buy something?
• Ambiguity check: Any term that could be interpreted two ways?
• Feasibility check: Are you demanding something the other side likely cannot do?
• Expiration: If used, is it realistic and aligned with your client’s alternatives?