Common Misconceptions: Frequent Mix-Ups and How to Fix Them

Why Misconceptions Happen (and How to Unlearn Them)

Many chemistry “mistakes” come from using everyday meanings of words (like “strong,” “stable,” or “dissolve”) in a science setting. Others come from mixing up similar-looking symbols (like subscripts vs. coefficients) or assuming that what you can see (bubbles, color changes, heat) directly tells you what particles are doing. The goal of this chapter is not to memorize corrections, but to build quick checks you can apply whenever you feel unsure.

A simple self-check routine

• Step 1: Identify the level. Are you talking about what you observe (macroscopic), what particles are doing (microscopic), or what symbols mean (symbolic)? Many mix-ups happen when you jump between levels without noticing.
• Step 2: Name what is changing. Is it the amount of substance, the type of substance, or the arrangement of particles?
• Step 3: Ask “what stays the same?” In chemical changes, atoms are rearranged, not created or destroyed. In physical changes, the substance identity stays the same.

Misconception 1: “Atoms Want Full Shells” (as if they have goals)

The mix-up: Beginners often hear phrases like “atoms want eight electrons” and interpret them literally, as if atoms have intentions.

What’s actually going on: Atoms and ions move toward lower energy, more stable arrangements under given conditions. The “octet” idea is a useful pattern for many main-group elements, but it is a shortcut, not a universal law, and it is not a motivation.

How to fix it

• Replace “want” with “tends to form arrangements that lower energy.”
• When you see an explanation using “want,” translate it into an energy statement: “This change is favored because it lowers the system’s energy.”

Practical step-by-step: translating a sentence

• Step 1: Find the intention word (“want,” “need,” “try”).
• Step 2: Replace it with “is more stable when…”
• Step 3: Check if the statement is about electron arrangement, charge balance, or energy.

Example translation: “Sodium wants to lose an electron” becomes “Sodium forms a more stable ion when it loses an electron in reactions where that transfer lowers the overall energy.”

Misconception 2: Subscripts and Coefficients Mean the Same Thing

The mix-up: Learners confuse the small numbers in formulas (subscripts) with the big numbers in front of formulas (coefficients). This leads to incorrect counting of atoms and incorrect interpretation of reactions.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

What’s actually going on: A subscript is part of a chemical formula and tells you the ratio of atoms within one particle (molecule or formula unit). A coefficient tells you how many of those particles you have.

How to fix it

• Subscript = “inside the particle.”
• Coefficient = “how many particles.”

Practical step-by-step: counting atoms correctly

Count atoms by multiplying: (coefficient) × (subscript), and if there are parentheses, multiply through them too.

• Step 1: Identify the coefficient (if none, it is 1).
• Step 2: For each element, identify its subscript (if none, it is 1).
• Step 3: If parentheses exist, multiply the subscripts inside by the outside subscript.
• Step 4: Multiply the result by the coefficient.

Example: 3 Ca(OH)2  contains: Ca = 3×1 = 3 atoms; O = 3×(2×1) = 6 atoms; H = 3×(2×1) = 6 atoms

Misconception 3: “Breaking Bonds Releases Energy”

The mix-up: People often say “bonds store energy” and think breaking a bond releases that stored energy like snapping a rubber band.

What’s actually going on: Breaking a chemical bond requires energy input (endothermic for that step). Forming a bond releases energy. A reaction releases energy overall only if the energy released by forming new bonds is greater than the energy required to break the old bonds.

How to fix it

• Memorize the direction: break = absorb, form = release.
• When you hear “this reaction releases energy,” mentally add: “because the new bonds formed are stronger (lower energy) than the bonds broken.”

Practical step-by-step: energy reasoning without calculations

• Step 1: List what bonds are broken (reactants).
• Step 2: List what bonds are formed (products).
• Step 3: If products have stronger/more stable bonding overall, the reaction tends to release energy.

You do not need exact bond energies to use this idea qualitatively: the key is that “release” comes from forming bonds, not breaking them.

Misconception 4: “Dissolving” Means “Melting” or “Disappearing”

The mix-up: A solid “vanishes” in water, so it feels like it melted or ceased to exist.

What’s actually going on: Dissolving is a mixing process at the particle level. The solute’s particles separate and become surrounded by solvent particles. The solute is still present; it is just dispersed.

How to fix it

• Ask: “If I remove the solvent, can I get the solute back?” If yes, it was dissolving, not disappearing.
• Use the word dispersed instead of “gone.”

Practical step-by-step: testing whether something dissolved

• Step 1: Observe: does the mixture look uniform after stirring?
• Step 2: Let it sit: does anything settle out? If it settles, it may be a suspension, not a solution.
• Step 3: Try evaporation (conceptually or in a safe lab setting): if solid remains, the solute was dissolved.

Important nuance: some substances react with water rather than simply dissolve. If gas forms, heat is released/absorbed strongly, or a new solid appears, a chemical change may be happening in addition to dissolving.

Misconception 5: “Strong Acid” Means “Concentrated Acid”

The mix-up: “Strong” in everyday language means “a lot of it,” so learners equate strong acids with high concentration.

What’s actually going on: Strength describes how completely an acid ionizes in water (extent of ionization). Concentration describes how much acid is present per volume. You can have a dilute strong acid or a concentrated weak acid.

How to fix it

• Translate “strong/weak” into “ionizes a lot/a little.”
• Translate “concentrated/dilute” into “more particles per volume/fewer particles per volume.”

Practical step-by-step: sorting statements

• Step 1: If the statement mentions “completely,” “partially,” or “equilibrium,” it’s about strength.
• Step 2: If it mentions “molarity,” “per liter,” “more/less in the same volume,” it’s about concentration.
• Step 3: If it mentions “pH,” it can depend on both; ask which one is changing.

Misconception 6: “pH Measures How Dangerous an Acid Is”

The mix-up: People assume lower pH automatically means more hazardous.

What’s actually going on: pH measures hydrogen ion concentration in a specific solution, but hazard depends on multiple factors: concentration, reactivity, ability to penetrate tissue, and more. A very low pH solution can be dangerous, but pH alone is not a complete safety label.

How to fix it

• Use pH as a chemical description, not a safety rating.
• When thinking about safety, consider concentration and the specific substance’s properties, and follow proper lab safety rules.

Misconception 7: “If It Bubbles, It Must Be Boiling”

The mix-up: Bubbles are associated with boiling water, so any bubbling is interpreted as boiling.

What’s actually going on: Bubbles can be caused by gas formation during a chemical reaction, by dissolved gas coming out of solution, or by boiling. The presence of bubbles alone does not identify the process.

How to fix it

• Ask what the gas could be and where it comes from.
• Check temperature: boiling requires reaching a boiling point; reactions can bubble at room temperature.

Practical step-by-step: diagnosing bubbles

• Step 1: Note conditions: is heat being added?
• Step 2: Ask if a reaction is expected (mixing two substances often can produce gas).
• Step 3: Consider dissolved gas: carbonated water bubbles without boiling.
• Step 4: Look for other signs of reaction: new odor, temperature change, precipitate, lasting color change.

Misconception 8: “A Catalyst Makes a Reaction Happen That Otherwise Can’t”

The mix-up: Learners think catalysts create reactions from nothing or change what products are possible.

What’s actually going on: A catalyst provides an alternative pathway with lower activation energy, making a reaction proceed faster. It does not change the overall starting and ending energy difference between reactants and products, and it is not used up in the overall process (though it can be deactivated).

How to fix it

• Think “catalyst = faster route,” not “different destination.”
• Remember: catalysts affect rate, not the basic identity of reactants/products in the net reaction.

Practical step-by-step: checking catalyst claims

• Step 1: Ask: does the catalyst appear in the final balanced net equation? Usually it should not.
• Step 2: Ask: is the claim about speed (rate) or about making new products? If it’s about new products, be skeptical unless the catalyst is enabling a different mechanism that still obeys conservation and thermodynamics.
• Step 3: Look for wording like “lowers activation energy,” “increases rate,” “provides pathway.”

Misconception 9: “Equilibrium Means Equal Amounts”

The mix-up: The word “equal” is inside “equilibrium,” so learners assume reactants and products must be present in equal amounts.

What’s actually going on: Equilibrium means the forward and reverse reaction rates are equal. The amounts of reactants and products can be very different at equilibrium.

How to fix it

• Replace “equal amounts” with “equal rates.”
• Imagine two escalators moving opposite directions at the same speed; people can still be mostly on one side depending on where they started and how the system is set up.

Practical step-by-step: interpreting an equilibrium situation

• Step 1: Identify what is changing forward and backward (which species are produced/consumed).
• Step 2: At equilibrium, stop thinking “no reaction.” Instead think “two reactions continue, but cancel in net change.”
• Step 3: If a change is made (adding/removing a species), expect the system to shift until rates match again.

Misconception 10: “A Precipitate Means the Reaction Is Finished”

The mix-up: Seeing a solid form feels like a clear endpoint, so learners assume the reaction must be complete.

What’s actually going on: A precipitate indicates that an insoluble solid formed, but it does not guarantee that all reactants were consumed. The reaction may stop because a limiting reactant runs out, because equilibrium is reached, or because the solid coats surfaces and slows further reaction.

How to fix it

• Use precipitate as evidence that a reaction occurred, not as proof of completion.
• Separate “reaction happened” from “reaction went to completion.”

Practical step-by-step: thinking about completion

• Step 1: Ask which reactant could be limiting (which one might run out first).
• Step 2: Consider whether the process could be reversible or equilibrium-limited.
• Step 3: If you had measurements (mass, concentration), completion would be tested quantitatively; without data, avoid absolute claims.

Misconception 11: “Oxidation Always Means Adding Oxygen”

The mix-up: In everyday contexts, oxidation is associated with rusting, which involves oxygen, so learners assume oxygen must be present.

What’s actually going on: Oxidation is best understood as loss of electrons (or increase in oxidation state). Oxygen is a common oxidizing agent, but oxidation can occur without oxygen present.

How to fix it

• Use the electron definition: oxidation = loss, reduction = gain.
• When oxygen is involved, it’s an example, not the definition.

Practical step-by-step: spotting oxidation/reduction in words

• Step 1: Look for electron transfer language: “loses electrons,” “gains electrons,” “oxidizing agent,” “reducing agent.”
• Step 2: If oxygen is mentioned, do not stop there; still ask: who lost electrons and who gained them?
• Step 3: If charges change (ions form), that often signals electron transfer.

Misconception 12: “Mass Is Lost When Gas Is Produced”

The mix-up: If a reaction makes a gas that escapes, the container seems to “lose” matter, so learners think mass was destroyed.

What’s actually going on: Mass is conserved, but it may leave the system if the system is open. If you measure only what remains in the container after gas escapes, you measure less mass because some matter is now in the air.

How to fix it

• Always define the system: open vs. closed.
• Conservation of mass applies to a closed system; in an open system, matter can move in or out.

Practical step-by-step: predicting what a balance will read

• Step 1: Decide if gas can escape (open container) or is trapped (sealed container).
• Step 2: If sealed, total mass before and after should match (within measurement error).
• Step 3: If open and gas forms, the measured mass of the container’s contents will likely decrease because gas leaves.

Misconception 13: “Neutralization Always Makes pH = 7”

The mix-up: “Neutral” sounds like “exactly 7,” so learners assume every acid-base neutralization ends at pH 7.

What’s actually going on: The pH after neutralization depends on the strengths of the acid and base and the amounts mixed. Some neutralizations produce solutions that are acidic or basic due to the ions left in solution.

How to fix it

• Separate the idea of “acid and base reacted” from “final pH is 7.”
• Ask what remains in solution after the main reaction: ions can affect pH.

Practical step-by-step: reasoning about final pH qualitatively

• Step 1: Determine whether the acid and base are strong or weak (conceptually: do they ionize a lot or a little?).
• Step 2: Consider whether one reactant is in excess; excess acid lowers pH, excess base raises pH.
• Step 3: If neither is in excess, consider whether the remaining ions can make the solution acidic/basic (some ions react with water).

Misconception 14: “The Limiting Reactant Is the One with the Smaller Coefficient”

The mix-up: Learners see a smaller number in the balanced equation and assume that substance must run out first.

What’s actually going on: The limiting reactant depends on the starting amounts compared to the required ratio. Coefficients tell you the required ratio, not which one you have less of.

How to fix it

• Think in terms of “how many reaction batches can each reactant support?”
• Never decide limiting reactant from the equation alone; you need starting quantities.

Practical step-by-step: the “reaction batches” method

• Step 1: Write the balanced equation and note the reactant coefficients.
• Step 2: Convert each reactant’s starting amount into “batches” by dividing by its coefficient (using consistent units like moles, or proportional particle counts).
• Step 3: The smaller number of batches indicates the limiting reactant.

Example idea (no numbers needed): If A needs 2 per batch and B needs 1 per batch, then batches from A = (amount of A)/2, batches from B = (amount of B)/1. Smaller batches limits.

Misconception 15: “A Chemical Formula Tells You the Exact Structure”

The mix-up: Seeing a formula like C2H6O, learners assume it uniquely identifies one substance and its structure.

What’s actually going on: A formula can tell you composition (which elements and how many), but different substances can share the same formula while having different arrangements of atoms (different structures), leading to different properties.

How to fix it

• Use formulas as composition labels, not blueprints.
• When properties differ, consider that structure may differ even if composition matches.

Practical step-by-step: avoiding “formula = identity” errors

• Step 1: Ask: is the formula empirical (ratio) or molecular (actual counts)? Either way, structure may not be specified.
• Step 2: Look for additional information: name, structural drawing, or context (functional group, bonding pattern).
• Step 3: If only a formula is given, avoid claims about shape, polarity, or behavior unless you have structural info.

Misconception 16: “If Two Substances Have the Same Elements, They Must React the Same Way”

The mix-up: Learners assume that if two substances contain the same elements, they will behave similarly.

What’s actually going on: Behavior depends on how atoms are connected and arranged, not just which elements are present. Even small structural differences can change boiling point, solubility, reactivity, and smell.

How to fix it

• Always ask “how are the atoms arranged?” not only “which atoms are present?”
• Use names and structures when predicting behavior; formulas alone may be insufficient.