Carrier categories and how they operate
“Carrier type” describes how transportation capacity is organized and sold. Understanding the operating model helps you predict transit time consistency, accessorial charges, and what problems the provider is best equipped to solve.
Parcel and express carriers
Best for: small packages (often under ~150 lb per piece), high shipment counts, standardized networks.
- How they operate: hub-and-spoke networks with scheduled linehaul, automated sortation, and published service levels (e.g., ground, 2-day, next-day). Pricing is typically based on zone, weight/dim weight, and surcharges (fuel, residential, peak).
- Operational implications: strong tracking events, predictable cutoffs, strict packaging/label requirements, claims processes are standardized.
LTL (Less-Than-Truckload) carriers
Best for: palletized freight that does not fill a trailer; multiple stops consolidated through terminals.
- How they operate: pickup & delivery (P&D) routes feed freight into terminals; shipments are rehandled and re-sorted between terminals until they reach the destination terminal.
- Operational implications: transit time depends on terminal lanes and rehandling; freight class/commodity and dimensions drive pricing; accessorials (liftgate, appointment, limited access) are common.
FTL / Truckload carriers
Best for: full trailer loads, time-sensitive or high-value freight needing minimal handling.
- How they operate: point-to-point moves using a single tractor/trailer (or relay). Capacity is managed by dispatch and driver hours; pricing is often per mile or per load, influenced by lane balance and seasonality.
- Operational implications: fewer touches than LTL; appointment management and detention practices matter; equipment type (dry van, reefer, flatbed) is a key constraint.
Drayage providers
Best for: short-haul container moves between ports/rail ramps and nearby warehouses, transload sites, or container yards.
- Listen to the audio with the screen off.
- Earn a certificate upon completion.
- Over 5000 courses for you to explore!
Download the app
- How they operate: appointment-driven moves tied to terminal availability; often includes chassis management and container “free time” constraints.
- Operational implications: demurrage/detention risk, port congestion exposure, and chassis availability can dominate performance more than miles.
Rail operators (railroads and intermodal service)
Best for: long-haul moves where rail linehaul is used, often paired with drayage at origin/destination.
- How they operate: scheduled train service between ramps; capacity and service can be affected by network congestion and equipment positioning.
- Operational implications: visibility may be event-based at ramp checkpoints; exceptions require coordination across rail and dray partners.
Ocean carriers
Best for: containerized international freight with port-to-port service.
- How they operate: vessel schedules with port calls; space is allocated via contracts or spot bookings; equipment (containers) must be positioned.
- Operational implications: schedule changes, rollovers, and port dwell can drive variability; documentation and cutoffs are critical.
Air carriers
Best for: high-value, urgent, or perishable shipments requiring fast airport-to-airport movement.
- How they operate: capacity sold on flights; may be belly cargo (passenger aircraft) or freighters; strict acceptance times and security screening.
- Operational implications: airport handling and customs readiness can be the bottleneck; weight/volume and dangerous goods rules are strict.
Integrators (end-to-end air express networks)
Best for: time-definite international and domestic shipments needing one provider for pickup, linehaul, customs brokerage (often), and delivery.
- How they operate: integrated pickup, air network, clearance, and last-mile delivery under one system and tracking ID.
- Operational implications: strong visibility and standardized processes; premium pricing; strict packaging and cutoff compliance.
Service models: who owns the trucks and who sells the capacity
Private fleet vs. for-hire carriers
Private fleet means the shipper owns/leases vehicles and employs drivers to move its own freight. For-hire means you pay a carrier to move freight as a service.
- Private fleet strengths: control over schedules, branding, consistent service for core lanes, direct driver management, potentially better store/plant service.
- Private fleet tradeoffs: fixed costs, backhaul imbalance, maintenance and compliance responsibility, scaling challenges during peaks.
- For-hire strengths: scalable capacity, access to specialized equipment, broader geographic coverage, variable cost model.
- For-hire tradeoffs: exposure to market rates, carrier prioritization during tight capacity, less direct control over drivers.
Asset-based vs. brokered capacity
Asset-based providers own/operate equipment (trucks, trailers, aircraft, vessels, terminals). Brokers (or non-asset providers) arrange transportation using a network of carriers.
- Asset-based strengths: direct control of capacity and operations, clearer accountability for service failures, often more consistent execution on core lanes.
- Asset-based risks: limited coverage outside their network, may reject freight that doesn’t fit their operating model.
- Brokered capacity strengths: flexible sourcing, rapid coverage expansion, access to niche equipment and regional carriers, useful for spot moves and overflow.
- Brokered capacity risks: service depends on the underlying carrier; visibility and claims handling can be more complex if roles aren’t clearly defined.
The role of 3PLs and freight forwarders
A 3PL (third-party logistics provider) can manage transportation execution (tendering, tracking, exception management), procurement (RFPs, rate benchmarking), and sometimes warehousing. A freight forwarder typically specializes in international moves, coordinating multiple legs and documentation, often consolidating freight and arranging customs-related activities.
- When they add value: multi-carrier management, limited internal bandwidth, complex routing, international coordination, peak season scaling, and access to negotiated capacity.
- What to clarify contractually: who is the carrier of record, liability/claims responsibility, visibility standards, escalation paths, and how accessorials are approved.
Carrier selection criteria (what to evaluate and how)
Carrier selection is a risk-and-service decision, not only a price decision. Use a structured scorecard so stakeholders can compare providers consistently.
1) Coverage and network fit
- Geography: origin/destination ZIP coverage, cross-border capability, and terminal/ramp proximity.
- Lane density: does the carrier run your lanes frequently (better reliability) or treat them as one-off?
- Peak resilience: ability to add capacity during seasonal surges.
2) Service commitments and operating discipline
- Transit time commitments: published standards or contract SLAs (on-time pickup/delivery definitions must be explicit).
- Appointment performance: ability to meet delivery windows and manage reschedules.
- Exception handling: proactive notifications, recovery options, and escalation procedures.
3) Equipment availability and suitability
- Equipment types: dry van, reefer, flatbed, container/chassis, liftgate, pallet jack, straps/bars, temperature monitoring.
- Capacity assurance: trailer pools, drop-and-hook capability, dedicated options, surge plans.
- Condition and compliance: maintenance practices, reefer calibration records, clean trailer programs.
4) Claims performance and cargo care
- Claims ratio: frequency and severity relative to shipment count/value.
- Claims process: documentation requirements, cycle time to resolution, dispute handling.
- Loss/damage prevention: handling SOPs, securement standards, theft prevention measures.
5) Tracking and visibility
- Milestone tracking: pickup, terminal/ramp events, out-for-delivery, proof of delivery (POD).
- Data integration: EDI/API capability, event timeliness, exception codes, location pings for truckload.
- Usability: portal quality, automated alerts, and reporting.
6) Financial stability and business continuity
- Stability indicators: years in business, insurance coverage, credit references, payment terms.
- Continuity planning: contingency capacity, subcontracting policies, and disaster recovery for IT systems.
7) Safety and compliance
- Safety record: incident rates, driver training, maintenance compliance.
- Regulatory compliance: operating authority, insurance certificates, hazardous materials capability (if needed).
8) Customer service and operational partnership
- Responsiveness: speed and quality of answers, availability of a dedicated rep.
- Problem solving: root-cause analysis on failures, corrective actions, willingness to share performance data.
- Billing quality: invoice accuracy, accessorial documentation, dispute cycle time.
Step-by-step: a practical carrier selection workflow
Step 1: Define the shipment profile and constraints
- Shipment frequency, average weight/volume, special handling (temperature, hazmat, high value).
- Pickup/delivery requirements: appointments, inside delivery, liftgate, limited access.
- Service targets: on-time %, maximum transit days, acceptable exception rate.
Step 2: Shortlist carrier types that match the job
- Small packages with high stop density → parcel/express or integrator.
- Palletized partial loads → LTL.
- Full trailer, minimal handling → truckload.
- Port/ramp legs → drayage plus the mainline provider.
Step 3: Build a scorecard with weighted criteria
Assign weights based on business priorities (e.g., reliability for medical devices, cost for low-value replenishment). Example weighting:
| Category | Weight | What “good” looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Service commitments | 25% | Clear SLA, strong on-time history, proactive exceptions |
| Coverage/network fit | 15% | Dense lanes, local terminals/ramps, peak plan |
| Equipment availability | 15% | Right equipment, drop options, surge capacity |
| Claims/cargo care | 15% | Low claims ratio, fast resolution, prevention SOPs |
| Visibility/integration | 10% | EDI/API, timely events, POD access |
| Safety/compliance | 10% | Strong safety record, current authority/insurance |
| Customer service/billing | 5% | Fast response, accurate invoicing |
| Financial stability | 5% | Stable, insured, continuity plan |
Step 4: Collect comparable data (avoid apples-to-oranges)
- Request lane-specific performance (on-time, claims) and define measurement rules.
- Confirm accessorial rate schedules and approval process.
- Validate technology: sample tracking events, integration documentation, and alerting.
Step 5: Run a pilot and measure
- Select a limited set of lanes/shipments for 2–6 weeks.
- Track: on-time pickup/delivery, exception count, claims, invoice accuracy, and response time.
- Hold a weekly review with corrective actions and owners.
Structured comparison checklist (use for RFPs or onboarding)
Carrier profile
- Legal entity name, operating authority, insurance limits, subcontracting policy
- Service area map and terminal/ramp locations
- Primary contact, escalation contact, after-hours support
Service and operations
- Defined SLAs (on-time definitions, measurement method, reporting cadence)
- Cutoff times, appointment process, detention/layover rules
- Peak season plan and capacity commitment language
Equipment and handling
- Equipment types available and constraints (reefer, liftgate, chassis, etc.)
- Drop trailer availability, trailer pool terms, temperature monitoring options
- Securement standards and cargo handling SOPs
Claims and liability
- Claims filing requirements, time limits, typical resolution time
- Historical claims ratio (frequency and severity)
- Packaging/pallet requirements that affect claim acceptance
Visibility and data
- Tracking milestones provided; POD availability and format
- EDI/API specs, data latency, exception codes
- Reporting: on-time, dwell, accessorials, lane analytics
Billing and accessorial control
- Rate format (contract, tariff, spot), fuel index method
- Accessorial list with triggers and required documentation
- Invoice dispute workflow and expected turnaround time
Safety and compliance
- Safety program overview, maintenance practices, driver qualification
- Hazmat capability (if applicable) and compliance documentation
Mini-case: choosing between price and reliability
Scenario: A manufacturer ships 40 truckload loads per month from Chicago to Dallas. Each load contains $120,000 of product. Late deliveries cause production line disruptions at the customer site, estimated at $2,500 per late load (expedites, overtime, and penalties). The shipper is evaluating two for-hire truckload providers.
Carrier A (lower price)
- Linehaul rate:
$1,850per load - On-time delivery:
88%(based on last 3 months for similar lanes) - Tracking: basic check calls; limited automated alerts
- Equipment: adequate, but limited surge capacity in peak weeks
- Claims: average
Carrier B (higher reliability)
- Linehaul rate:
$2,050per load - On-time delivery:
96% - Tracking: GPS-based updates + automated exception alerts + fast POD
- Equipment: strong availability; offers drop trailer at origin
- Claims: low frequency; fast resolution
Step-by-step evaluation
Step 1: Calculate direct transportation cost difference
Monthly linehaul cost:
- Carrier A:
40 × $1,850 = $74,000 - Carrier B:
40 × $2,050 = $82,000 - Difference:
$8,000more per month for Carrier B
Step 2: Estimate the cost of late deliveries
Expected late loads per month:
- Carrier A late rate:
12%→40 × 0.12 = 4.8late loads - Carrier B late rate:
4%→40 × 0.04 = 1.6late loads
Estimated disruption cost:
- Carrier A:
4.8 × $2,500 = $12,000 - Carrier B:
1.6 × $2,500 = $4,000 - Difference: Carrier A costs
$8,000more per month in disruption risk
Step 3: Compare “total expected cost” (simple model)
- Carrier A expected monthly total:
$74,000 + $12,000 = $86,000 - Carrier B expected monthly total:
$82,000 + $4,000 = $86,000
In this simplified view, both carriers are equal on expected cost. The decision then depends on risk tolerance and secondary factors (visibility, peak capacity, customer impact).
Step 4: Use a scorecard to break the tie
Example scoring (1–5, higher is better):
| Criteria | Weight | Carrier A | Carrier B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service commitments & on-time performance | 25% | 3 | 5 |
| Coverage/network fit | 15% | 4 | 4 |
| Equipment availability | 15% | 3 | 5 |
| Claims performance | 15% | 3 | 4 |
| Tracking/visibility | 10% | 2 | 5 |
| Safety/compliance | 10% | 4 | 4 |
| Customer service/billing | 5% | 3 | 4 |
| Financial stability | 5% | 4 | 4 |
Step 5: Decide the sourcing strategy
Rather than choosing only one, a common approach is a primary/secondary allocation:
- Award Carrier B as primary for time-critical customer orders and peak weeks.
- Use Carrier A as secondary for flexible orders or when Carrier B is constrained.
Operationalize the strategy by defining tender rules (e.g., Carrier B gets first tender with a 30-minute acceptance window; overflow goes to Carrier A) and monitoring weekly performance against the scorecard.