Audience and Market Research with AI: Personas, Pain Points, and Messaging Angles

AI can accelerate audience and market research by turning messy qualitative inputs (notes, reviews, call transcripts) into structured hypotheses: who your segments are, what they are trying to achieve, what blocks them, and which messages might resonate. The key is to treat AI outputs as drafts—useful for speed and coverage—then validate with real-world evidence (analytics, interviews, sales feedback, and experiments).

1) Gather Inputs (Your “Research Pack”)

Before asking AI to synthesize anything, assemble a small, representative set of raw materials. The quality of your inputs determines the usefulness of the outputs.

What to collect

• Customer notes: onboarding forms, support tickets, success manager notes, churn notes.
• Reviews: app store, G2/Capterra, Amazon, industry forums, Reddit threads (capture quotes and context).
• Sales calls: discovery call notes, objection handling moments, “why now?” triggers.
• FAQs: top questions from chat, email, knowledge base search terms.
• Competitors: positioning statements, pricing pages, feature comparison tables, ad copy, landing pages.
• Analytics snippets: top landing pages, highest-exit pages, search queries, conversion rates by channel, cohort retention notes.

How to format the pack for AI (fast and consistent)

Create a single document with sections and paste short excerpts. Keep each excerpt labeled with a source and date so you can trace claims later.

PRODUCT: [Name], CATEGORY: [e.g., email automation for ecommerce]  DATE RANGE: [last 90 days]

1) CUSTOMER NOTES (10–20 bullets)
- [Source: CSM notes | 2025-11-03] “...”
- ...

2) REVIEWS (10–30 quotes)
- [Source: G2 | 2025-10-12 | 4 stars] “...”
- ...

3) SALES CALLS (5–10 moments)
- [Source: Call #14 | Mid-market | 2025-11-18] Objection: “...”
- ...

4) FAQ + SUPPORT THEMES
- [Source: Helpdesk tags] Theme: ... Example quote: “...”

5) COMPETITOR SNAPSHOTS (3–5 competitors)
- Competitor A: tagline..., pricing..., claims...

6) ANALYTICS SNIPPETS
- Top converting page: ... (CVR ...)
- Top exit page: ... (Exit rate ...)
- Top search queries: ...

Tip: If you have too much data, sample it. For example: 20 reviews across ratings (5★, 3★, 1★) and 10 sales calls across segments. Sampling reduces bias from only hearing your happiest (or angriest) customers.

2) Prompts to Synthesize (Personas, JTBD, Objections, Outcomes)

Use AI to convert the research pack into structured artifacts. Require the model to (a) cite which input snippets it used, (b) label confidence, and (c) leave placeholders where evidence is missing.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

Prompt: Draft personas with evidence placeholders + confidence

You are my market research assistant. Use ONLY the Research Pack below.
Task: Draft 2–4 provisional personas.
For each persona include:
- Name + role + company context
- Primary goal (business outcome)
- Jobs-to-be-done (functional, emotional, social)
- Key pain points (ranked)
- Common objections + what triggers them
- Buying triggers (“why now?”)
- Decision criteria
- Preferred channels/content formats
- Exact phrases customers use (quotes if available)

Evidence rules:
- For each claim, add: [Evidence: source label + quote or snippet].
- If evidence is missing, write: [Evidence needed: ...].
- Add a confidence score 1–5 per section (goal, pains, objections, triggers).

Output as a table.

RESEARCH PACK:
[PASTE HERE]

Prompt: Jobs-to-be-done (JTBD) map + desired outcomes

Using the Research Pack, create a JTBD map for the top 2 segments.
For each segment:
1) Situation/Context
2) Main job statement: “When..., I want to..., so I can...”
3) Steps in the job (before/during/after)
4) Desired outcomes (measurable if possible)
5) Barriers/anxieties
6) Current alternatives/workarounds

Add confidence (1–5) and evidence tags for each item.
If you infer anything, label it as ASSUMPTION.

Prompt: Objection inventory + rebuttal ingredients (not final copy)

From the Research Pack, list the top objections grouped by:
- Price/budget
- Risk (implementation, downtime, compliance)
- Trust (proof, brand, security)
- Fit (features, integrations, use case)
- Switching costs

For each objection provide:
- Who says it (persona/segment)
- When it appears (funnel stage)
- What they are really afraid of
- What proof would reduce it (case study, demo, benchmark, guarantee)
- Confidence 1–5 + evidence tags

Do NOT write marketing copy; write research notes.

What “confidence” should mean (so it’s not arbitrary)

3) Produce Messaging Angles and Value Propositions (by Segment and Funnel Stage)

Once you have provisional personas/JTBD, ask AI to generate messaging angles—different ways to frame the same product value—then map them to funnel stages. Keep this structured and testable.

Define the building blocks

• Messaging angle: a specific frame (e.g., “reduce risk,” “save time,” “increase revenue,” “avoid mistakes,” “look good to stakeholders”).
• Value proposition: a concise statement connecting persona + pain + promise + differentiation.
• Proof: the evidence that makes the promise believable (metrics, case studies, demos, guarantees, third-party validation).
• Funnel stage: Awareness (problem framing), Consideration (solution comparison), Decision (proof and risk reversal), Onboarding/Expansion (time-to-value, adoption).

Prompt: Generate messaging angles by persona × funnel stage

Using the provisional personas and JTBD you created (and the Research Pack), produce messaging angles.

Output a matrix with rows = personas and columns = funnel stages:
- Awareness: problem framing + stakes
- Consideration: solution approach + differentiators
- Decision: proof + risk reversal
- Onboarding/Expansion: time-to-value + habit formation

For each cell include:
1) Angle name (2–4 words)
2) Core promise (one sentence)
3) Proof type needed (not copy)
4) Likely objection to address
5) Confidence 1–5 + evidence tags

Constraints:
- No generic claims (e.g., “best-in-class”).
- If proof is missing, write [Proof needed: ...].
- Keep each cell under 60 words.

Example: What a good angle looks like (template)

4) Validation Workflow: Turn AI Output into a Verification Plan

AI will inevitably fill gaps. Your job is to separate observations (supported by evidence) from assumptions (inferred). Then create a lightweight plan to verify the highest-impact assumptions.

A simple “Assumption Ledger”

Ask AI to produce a ledger you can review with sales/support/product.

Create an Assumption Ledger from the personas + messaging matrix.
For each assumption include:
- Assumption statement
- Why it matters (what decision it affects)
- Current confidence (1–5)
- What would prove/disprove it (specific evidence)
- Fastest validation method (interview, survey, analytics check, ad test)
- Owner + due date (leave blank placeholders)

Output as a table.

What to verify first (prioritization rules)

• High impact + low confidence: could change positioning, pricing, or target segment.
• High frequency objections: anything that repeatedly blocks deals.
• Message-market fit signals: claims that correlate with conversion lifts or demo requests.
• Segment differences: where one message helps Persona A but hurts Persona B.

Interview and survey question set (short, reusable)

Use AI to draft questions, but keep them neutral and behavior-based. Avoid leading language like “Would you like…” or “How great would it be if…”.

Draft 10 interview questions to validate:
- the top 3 pains
- the “why now” trigger
- the strongest objection
- the desired outcome metrics
- current alternatives

Rules:
- Questions must be neutral and specific.
- Prefer “Tell me about the last time...” and “What happened next?”
- Include 2 questions that test willingness-to-pay or tradeoffs without asking directly for price.
- Output as a numbered list.

Examples of strong validation questions you can reuse:

• “Tell me about the last time you tried to solve this. What did you do first?”
• “What made it a problem worth solving now rather than later?”
• “What would have to be true for you to trust a tool like this?”
• “Which option did you consider and why did you rule it out?”
• “If you couldn’t use your current workaround anymore, what would you do?”

Activity: Generate Two Personas and a Messaging Matrix

In this activity, you will (1) generate two provisional personas and (2) create a messaging matrix: persona × pain point × promise × proof. Use your own Research Pack. If you don’t have one yet, use a small starter pack (10 reviews + 5 support tickets + 3 competitor snapshots + 3 analytics notes) and label confidence lower.

Step A — Generate two personas (copy/paste prompt)

Using ONLY the Research Pack below, generate exactly TWO provisional personas.
For each persona include:
- Persona name
- Role + company type
- Top 3 pain points (ranked)
- Top 3 desired outcomes (ranked)
- Top objections (ranked)
- Buying trigger
- Evidence tags + confidence 1–5

RESEARCH PACK:
[PASTE HERE]

Step B — Create the messaging matrix (copy/paste prompt)

Create a messaging matrix with columns:
Persona | Pain point | Promise (one sentence) | Proof (what would make it believable) | Funnel stage

Rules:
- Provide 3 rows per persona (6 rows total).
- Each promise must be specific and measurable where possible.
- Proof must be concrete (metric, case study, demo artifact, benchmark, guarantee, integration list).
- Add [Evidence] tags if supported; otherwise write [Proof needed].
- Keep each row under 35 words.

Messaging matrix example (format to emulate)

After generating your matrix, review it with a skeptic’s eye: highlight any promise without proof, any pain point without direct evidence, and any segment that seems too broad. Those highlights become your next validation tasks.