Why asset allocation matters more than picking funds
For a simple long-term portfolio built with broad index funds, the biggest decision is usually not which stock fund or which bond fund—it is how much of the portfolio is in stocks versus bonds (and cash-like assets). That mix largely determines how bumpy the ride will be and how deep losses can get during market declines.
Think of your portfolio as two building blocks that do different jobs:
- Equities (stocks): the growth engine. Higher expected long-term return, but larger and more frequent declines.
- Bonds and cash-like assets: the stabilizers. Lower expected return, but typically smaller declines and a source of liquidity for planned spending or rebalancing.
The two building blocks in practice
Equities: the growth engine
Stocks represent ownership in companies. In a broad index fund, you hold many companies at once. The trade-off is simple: you accept short-term uncertainty for the chance of long-term growth. In a portfolio context, stocks are what make the plan work over decades, but they are also what create the largest drawdowns.
Practical implication: if you need money soon, a high stock allocation can force you to sell after a drop. If you do not need the money for a long time, you can usually tolerate more stock exposure because you have time to recover.
Bonds and cash-like assets: stability and liquidity
Bonds are loans to governments or companies. High-quality bond funds often fluctuate less than stock funds and may hold up better during stock market stress. Cash-like assets (money market funds, short-term Treasury funds, high-yield savings) are typically even more stable, but their long-term growth potential is usually the lowest.
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...Download the app
In a long-term portfolio, bonds and cash-like assets can serve three roles:
- Reduce portfolio volatility: smaller day-to-day and month-to-month swings.
- Reduce drawdowns: when stocks fall sharply, bonds often fall less, and sometimes rise, which can soften the overall decline.
- Provide liquidity: money for near-term spending, rebalancing, or unexpected needs without selling stocks at a bad time.
Why bonds can reduce drawdowns even with lower expected returns
It can feel counterintuitive to hold an asset with lower expected return. The point is not to “beat stocks”; the point is to change the shape of the ride.
Here is the mechanism in plain terms:
- Different behavior: stocks and high-quality bonds often do not move in lockstep. When stocks drop, bonds may drop less or even rise (not guaranteed).
- Mathematical cushioning: if part of your portfolio is in something that falls less, the total portfolio falls less.
- Rebalancing fuel: if stocks fall and bonds hold up, you can rebalance by selling some bonds and buying stocks at lower prices—without injecting new cash.
Important nuance: bonds are not risk-free. Rising interest rates can push bond prices down, and lower-quality bonds can behave more like stocks in a crisis. The stabilizing role is most reliable with high-quality, diversified bond funds and with a time horizon that matches the bond duration you hold.
A step-by-step method to choose your stock/bond mix
This process is designed to produce a reasonable range and then a single target allocation. The ranges below are illustrative, not promises, and are meant for broad, diversified index funds.
Step 1: Start from your time horizon (when you will need the money)
Define the horizon for this portfolio goal (not your age). If you have multiple goals, you may need separate “buckets” or separate allocations.
| Time horizon for this money | Illustrative starting stock range | Illustrative starting bond/cash range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–3 years | 0–30% | 70–100% |
| 3–7 years | 30–60% | 40–70% |
| 7–15 years | 60–80% | 20–40% |
| 15+ years | 80–100% | 0–20% |
How to use the table: pick the row that matches when you expect to start spending the money. This gives you a starting range, not a final answer.
Step 2: Confirm your emergency fund and near-term spending needs
Before choosing an aggressive stock allocation, make sure you are not relying on the portfolio for short-term cash needs.
- Emergency fund: set aside cash-like reserves for unexpected expenses (job loss, medical, urgent repairs). If your emergency fund is thin, you may need a more conservative allocation or a separate cash reserve before investing aggressively.
- Planned spending in the next 1–3 years: down payment, tuition, taxes, large purchases. Money needed soon generally belongs in cash-like assets or very short-term high-quality bonds, not in stocks.
Practical rule: if you would be forced to sell investments to cover a likely expense in the next few years, treat that amount as a separate, conservative allocation.
Step 3: Decide your maximum tolerable drawdown (your “I can live with this” number)
Choose a portfolio decline that you believe you could tolerate without changing the plan. This is not about what you hope happens; it is about what you can stick with when headlines are bad.
Use this as a self-test:
- If your portfolio dropped 10%, would you stay invested and keep your allocation?
- If it dropped 20%?
- If it dropped 30%?
- If it dropped 40%+?
Many beginners overestimate their tolerance. If you are unsure, choose a more conservative drawdown limit and adjust later after you have lived through normal volatility.
Step 4: Translate drawdown tolerance into a stock/bond range
Below is a rough mapping between stock-heavy mixes and potential drawdowns during severe bear markets. These are not forecasts; they are planning approximations based on how diversified portfolios have behaved historically.
| Stock allocation | Bond/cash allocation | Illustrative “bad year” drawdown range | Who it tends to fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20–40% | 60–80% | ~5% to ~15% | Short horizons, very drawdown-averse |
| 40–60% | 40–60% | ~10% to ~25% | Medium horizons, moderate tolerance |
| 60–80% | 20–40% | ~15% to ~35% | Longer horizons, higher tolerance |
| 80–100% | 0–20% | ~25% to ~50%+ | Very long horizons, strong stomach and stable cash flow |
How to use the table:
- Pick the row whose drawdown range you could realistically tolerate.
- Cross-check that row against your time-horizon starting range from Step 1.
- If the two conflict, prioritize the constraint that would force bad behavior (usually drawdown tolerance and near-term spending needs).
Step 5: Choose a single target allocation (not just a range)
Ranges are useful for thinking, but your portfolio needs a target so you can rebalance consistently.
Method:
- Take the overlap between your time-horizon range and your drawdown-tolerance range.
- Pick a single point that you can explain in one sentence (example: “70/30 because I have 10+ years and I can tolerate a ~25–30% decline without selling”).
- If you are torn between two targets, choose the more conservative one. You can always increase stock exposure later after you have more experience and stronger cash reserves.
Example: Suppose your horizon is 10 years (starting range 60–80% stocks) and your tolerable drawdown feels like ~20–25% (suggesting 40–60% stocks). The overlap is around 60% stocks. A reasonable target might be 60% stocks / 40% bonds.
Implementation with index funds (simple building blocks)
Once you have a target mix, you can implement it with broad index funds. One common structure is:
- Total/global stock index fund(s) for the equity portion.
- High-quality diversified bond index fund for the bond portion.
- Cash-like fund/account for emergency savings and near-term spending (often kept outside the long-term portfolio).
Example target: 70/30. If you have $10,000 to invest for the long term, that could mean $7,000 in a broad stock index fund and $3,000 in a broad bond index fund.
Decision worksheet: arrive at your target allocation and rules
Part A: Inputs
1) Goal for this portfolio: ________________________________ (e.g., retirement, house in 8 years, etc. )
2) Time horizon until first major withdrawal: _______________ years
3) Emergency fund status (choose one):
[ ] Fully funded (can cover key expenses without selling investments)
[ ] Partially funded
[ ] Not funded
4) Planned spending from this portfolio in next 1–3 years:
$_____________ (if > $0, consider separating this into cash-like assets)
5) Maximum tolerable drawdown without changing plan:
[ ] ~10% [ ] ~20% [ ] ~30% [ ] ~40%+
6) Any constraints?
- Need high stability for sleep-at-night: [ ] yes [ ] no
- Income is unstable / job risk high: [ ] yes [ ] no
- Likely large expense soon: [ ] yes [ ] noPart B: Choose your range
Time-horizon starting range (from table): Stocks ____% to ____%
Drawdown-based range (from table): Stocks ____% to ____%
Final chosen stock range (overlap): Stocks ____% to ____%Part C: Pick your target allocation
My target allocation:
- Stocks: ____%
- Bonds (and/or bond fund): ____%
- Cash-like (if held inside portfolio): ____%
One-sentence rationale:
____________________________________________________________Part D: Your rules (review vs. react)
Write rules now so you do not improvise during market stress.
- Review schedule: I will review my allocation on a fixed schedule:
[ ] quarterly [ ] semiannually [ ] annually. - Rebalancing trigger: I will rebalance if my stock allocation drifts more than
____percentage points from target (example: 5 or 10 points), or on the review date. - When I will change the target allocation: only if my time horizon changes materially, my need for near-term spending changes, or my ability/willingness to tolerate drawdowns changes after careful review.
- When I will NOT change the target allocation: not because of headlines, market predictions, recent performance, or fear after a drop.
- Cash needs rule: I will not invest money needed within the next
____years into stocks.