Typical Purchasing Scenarios and Practical End-to-End Exercises

Capítulo 10

Estimated reading time: 11 minutes

+ Exercise

How to Use These Scenarios

This chapter is a practice lab. You will work through five common purchasing variations and produce (or review) the same types of outputs you will face on the job: documents, approval routing decisions, and exception handling. Each scenario includes an end-to-end traceability task: you will follow one PO line from request through payment and answer checkpoint questions that test whether the transaction would successfully clear controls (matching, approvals, and evidence of receipt/service).

What You Will Deliver in Each Scenario

  • Document pack: the minimum set of artifacts that must exist (even if they are system-generated).
  • Approval path: who must approve and why (based on spend type, urgency, risk, and dollar thresholds).
  • Issue prediction: where the process commonly breaks and what evidence resolves it.
  • Traceability answers: checkpoints that prove you can follow a single line item through to payment.

Suggested Working Method (Repeat for Each Scenario)

  1. Read the scenario and highlight: item/service, quantity, price, delivery location/date, and any special terms (freight, warranty, inspection, return rights).
  2. List required documents and identify the “system of record” for each (procurement system, receiving system, AP system).
  3. Map approvals: requester → budget owner → procurement → any special approvers (IT/security, facilities, EHS, capex committee).
  4. Identify match points: what will be matched (PO vs receipt vs invoice) and what tolerances apply.
  5. Run the traceability task and answer checkpoint questions.

Scenario 1: Catalog Office Supplies (Low Risk, High Volume)

Situation: A department needs standard office supplies (paper, pens, toner) from an approved catalog supplier. Delivery is to the main office within 2 business days. Spend is small but frequent.

Step-by-Step Practice

  1. Create the requisition from catalog: select items, confirm unit of measure, and validate ship-to and cost center.
  2. Check budget availability: confirm funds for the cost center and period.
  3. Route for approval: typically the cost center owner (and possibly a delegated approver for low-value purchases).
  4. Generate the PO: ensure catalog pricing and supplier terms populate correctly.
  5. Confirm receipt: for office supplies, receipt may be “desktop receiving” or central receiving depending on policy.
  6. Invoice handling: many organizations use consolidated invoices (weekly/monthly) for catalog suppliers.

Document Pack (Produce/Review)

  • Catalog requisition (line-level details and accounting)
  • Approval record (who approved, when, and under what authority)
  • PO (or PO confirmation if supplier acknowledges electronically)
  • Receipt confirmation (GRN or equivalent confirmation record)
  • Supplier invoice (possibly consolidated)

Correct Approval Path (Decide)

  • Primary approver: cost center/budget owner
  • Procurement involvement: often minimal (catalog controls substitute for manual review)
  • Common policy trigger: if a line exceeds a threshold (e.g., high-value toner order), it may require additional approval

Where Issues Arise (Predict)

  • Wrong ship-to → goods delivered elsewhere; receipt not recorded; invoice cannot match.
  • Catalog substitution/backorder → supplier ships different item/quantity; mismatch at invoice.
  • Consolidated invoice complexity → multiple POs/receipts on one invoice; missing one receipt blocks the whole invoice if not split.

Traceability Task: Follow One PO Line

Choose one line: “A4 paper, 10 reams”. Trace it from requisition to payment and answer:

  • Checkpoint 1: What document proves receipt? Identify the specific receipt confirmation/GRN (or desktop receiving record) tied to that PO line.
  • Checkpoint 2: What triggers AP to release payment? Invoice matched to PO line and receipt confirmation within tolerance, plus invoice approval if required.
  • Checkpoint 3: What exception would stop the match? Price variance (catalog price changed), quantity variance (short shipment), or missing receipt confirmation.

Scenario 2: Urgent Replacement Part with Expedited Freight (Time-Critical)

Situation: A production line is down. Maintenance needs a replacement motor controller today. Supplier can ship immediately with expedited freight. The part is not in catalog. Total cost includes part + freight surcharge.

Step-by-Step Practice

  1. Create an urgent requisition: include part number, specifications, required delivery time, and justification (“line down”).
  2. Confirm sourcing approach: use an approved supplier if possible; if not, document why (availability/time).
  3. Capture freight correctly: decide whether freight is a separate PO line, a service line, or included in unit price (follow your policy).
  4. Route for expedited approval: ensure emergency approvals still comply with authority limits.
  5. Issue PO quickly: include delivery instructions, required ship method, and any “no substitutions” note.
  6. Receive and record: receiving evidence may include proof of delivery plus internal confirmation that the correct part arrived.
  7. Invoice review: verify freight surcharge matches what was authorized.

Document Pack (Produce/Review)

  • Urgent requisition with justification
  • Supplier quote/confirmation (email is common in emergencies)
  • PO including freight terms (Incoterms/ship method if used internally)
  • Proof of delivery (carrier POD) and receipt record
  • Invoice showing part and freight

Correct Approval Path (Decide)

  • Primary approver: operations/maintenance budget owner
  • Additional approver (common): plant manager or emergency approver due to urgency and premium freight
  • Procurement review: confirm supplier legitimacy and pricing reasonableness (even if after-the-fact review is permitted)

Where Issues Arise (Predict)

  • Freight not authorized → invoice includes expedited freight but PO does not; match fails.
  • Part number mismatch → supplier ships a “compatible” item; receiving disputes; payment delayed.
  • After-hours delivery → POD exists but receipt not posted; invoice stuck in “missing receipt”.

Traceability Task: Follow One PO Line

Choose one line: “Motor controller, qty 1” (and optionally the freight line). Answer:

Continue in our app.
  • Listen to the audio with the screen off.
  • Earn a certificate upon completion.
  • Over 5000 courses for you to explore!
Or continue reading below...
Download App

Download the app

  • Checkpoint 1: What document proves receipt? Carrier POD plus internal receipt posting tied to the PO line (or a receiving log if policy allows).
  • Checkpoint 2: What triggers AP to release payment? Matched invoice to PO and receipt; freight line must also match authorization/tolerance.
  • Checkpoint 3: What exception would stop the match? Freight billed but not on PO, price variance beyond tolerance, or receipt not posted despite POD.

Scenario 3: Recurring Services Under a Blanket PO (Cleaning / IT Support)

Situation: Facilities has a monthly cleaning service. IT has a monthly support retainer. Both are recurring services with predictable spend. A blanket PO (BPO) covers the year with monthly invoices.

Step-by-Step Practice

  1. Set up the blanket PO structure: define service description, period of performance, not-to-exceed amount, and billing frequency.
  2. Define how “receipt” is evidenced for services: e.g., monthly service acceptance, timesheets, ticket reports, or manager sign-off.
  3. Establish invoice referencing rules: invoice must reference BPO number and service period (e.g., “Jan 1–31”).
  4. Monthly cycle: (a) service delivered, (b) service acceptance recorded, (c) invoice received, (d) match/approval, (e) payment.
  5. Monitor consumption: track remaining BPO balance and prevent overbilling.

Document Pack (Produce/Review)

  • Blanket PO with not-to-exceed value and service period
  • Service acceptance record (monthly sign-off, service entry sheet, or equivalent)
  • Supplier invoice referencing period and BPO
  • Any supporting evidence (cleaning checklist, IT ticket summary, SLA report)

Correct Approval Path (Decide)

  • Initial BPO approval: budget owner + procurement (and possibly legal/vendor management if required for service terms)
  • Monthly approval: service owner confirms performance (facilities manager / IT manager)
  • Special approvers (common): IT/security for IT support; site EHS for certain facility services

Where Issues Arise (Predict)

  • Missing service period on invoice → cannot confirm what month is billed; approval delayed.
  • No service acceptance recorded → invoice cannot be approved/matched; payment held.
  • BPO exhausted mid-year → invoices exceed remaining balance; requires change order or new BPO.
  • Rate changes → supplier increases monthly fee; if BPO not updated, price variance triggers exception.

Traceability Task: Follow One BPO Line

Choose one line: “Monthly cleaning service – Building A”. Answer:

  • Checkpoint 1: What document proves receipt? Service acceptance record for the billed month (sign-off/service entry sheet).
  • Checkpoint 2: What triggers AP to release payment? Approved service acceptance + invoice referencing correct period and BPO, within remaining balance.
  • Checkpoint 3: What exception would stop the match? Invoice billed for wrong period, missing acceptance, or invoice exceeds BPO remaining value.

Scenario 4: One-Time Capital Equipment Purchase with Inspection (High Value, High Control)

Situation: Engineering purchases a new packaging machine. It is a capital asset requiring formal inspection/acceptance before payment. Delivery includes installation and commissioning. Payment terms may include milestones (deposit, delivery, acceptance).

Step-by-Step Practice

  1. Prepare the requisition with capex details: asset category, intended location, and required acceptance criteria (e.g., performance test).
  2. Confirm approval routing: capex often requires additional approvals beyond normal spend authority (finance/capex committee).
  3. Build the PO with milestones: separate lines for equipment, installation, training, and any commissioning services; define milestone payment triggers.
  4. Plan receiving and inspection: define who inspects, what documents they complete, and what constitutes acceptance.
  5. Record receipt vs acceptance: physical delivery may be recorded, but payment may be blocked until acceptance is documented.
  6. Invoice processing by milestone: ensure invoices align to the correct milestone and that acceptance evidence exists.

Document Pack (Produce/Review)

  • Capex requisition with business justification and asset coding
  • Approval evidence (capex approvers, finance)
  • PO with milestone schedule and acceptance criteria
  • Delivery documentation (POD) and receiving record
  • Inspection/acceptance report (commissioning sign-off, test results)
  • Supplier invoices by milestone (deposit/delivery/acceptance)

Correct Approval Path (Decide)

  • Primary approver: engineering/operations budget owner
  • Mandatory additional approvers (common): finance/capex committee; sometimes risk, safety, or quality depending on equipment
  • Procurement role: ensure PO terms reflect milestone controls and acceptance requirements

Where Issues Arise (Predict)

  • Invoice arrives before acceptance → AP holds payment; supplier disputes; relationship strain.
  • Milestones unclear → invoice cannot be tied to a PO line; manual intervention required.
  • Partial delivery → receiving posted for some components; invoice billed for full system; quantity/value mismatch.
  • Inspection documentation missing → acceptance cannot be proven; payment blocked even if equipment is installed.

Traceability Task: Follow One PO Line

Choose one line: “Packaging machine – base unit”. Answer:

  • Checkpoint 1: What document proves receipt? Receiving record tied to delivery (often supported by POD), plus inspection/acceptance report if payment requires acceptance.
  • Checkpoint 2: What triggers AP to release payment? Milestone condition met (e.g., acceptance sign-off) and invoice matched to the correct PO milestone/line.
  • Checkpoint 3: What exception would stop the match? Invoice billed for acceptance milestone without acceptance report, or billed amount exceeds milestone value/tolerance.

Scenario 5: Return and Credit Note After Damaged Delivery (Reverse Flow)

Situation: A shipment of goods arrives damaged. Receiving notes damage. The supplier agrees to a return and issues a credit note (or replacement shipment). AP must ensure the original invoice is not overpaid and that the credit is applied correctly.

Step-by-Step Practice

  1. Document the damage at receipt: record condition, quantities affected, and photos if required.
  2. Initiate return authorization: obtain supplier RMA/return reference and shipping instructions.
  3. Record the return movement: ensure the system reflects goods returned (inventory/receiving adjustment).
  4. Decide resolution path: credit note vs replacement shipment (or both: replacement plus freight credit).
  5. AP handling: link credit note to the original invoice/PO line and ensure it offsets payment or creates a recoverable balance.

Document Pack (Produce/Review)

  • Receiving discrepancy/damage report (with evidence)
  • Supplier RMA/return authorization
  • Return shipment documentation (carrier tracking, return receipt if applicable)
  • Credit note (or replacement order confirmation)
  • AP adjustment record showing how the credit is applied to the invoice/payment

Correct Approval Path (Decide)

  • Return approval: receiving/warehouse + requester confirmation; procurement may approve supplier negotiation outcomes
  • Credit note approval: AP validates linkage to original invoice and ensures correct accounting treatment
  • Escalation trigger: repeated damage incidents may require supplier performance review

Where Issues Arise (Predict)

  • Invoice paid before damage discovered → recovery process needed; credit must be tracked and applied later.
  • Credit note not referenced correctly → credit sits unapplied; supplier statement shows open credit while books show overpayment.
  • Return not recorded in system → inventory and receipt records disagree; matching and financials become inconsistent.
  • Replacement shipped but original receipt not reversed → double quantity on hand; invoice/receipt confusion.

Traceability Task: Follow One PO Line

Choose one line: “Item X, qty 20” where 5 units were damaged. Answer:

  • Checkpoint 1: What document proves receipt? Initial receipt record plus discrepancy/damage report indicating accepted vs rejected quantities.
  • Checkpoint 2: What triggers AP to release payment? Only the accepted quantity should clear matching; payment is released when invoice aligns to accepted quantity/value (or after credit is applied).
  • Checkpoint 3: What exception would stop the match? Invoice billed for full quantity when only partial quantity was accepted, or missing credit note/return record for rejected units.

End-to-End Traceability Drill (Cross-Scenario Worksheet)

Use this worksheet format to practice traceability consistently. Complete it once per scenario for one selected PO line.

Traceability FieldYour Entry (per selected PO line)
Requisition ID and line
Approval record (approver + date)
PO number and line
Supplier confirmation reference
Receipt evidence (GRN/service acceptance/POD)
Invoice number and line reference
Match status (cleared / blocked)
If blocked: exception code and root cause
Resolution action and owner
Payment reference (date/method/batch)

Checkpoint Questions (Answer for Each Scenario)

  • Evidence: Which single record is the strongest proof that the organization received the goods/services for this line?
  • Trigger: What exact event changes the invoice from “held” to “eligible for payment”?
  • Stopper: Name one realistic exception that would block matching for this line, and the document needed to clear it.
  • Ownership: Who is the best owner to resolve the exception (requester, receiving, procurement, supplier, AP), and why?

Optional Challenge: Spot the Hidden Control Gaps

For each scenario, identify one control gap that could allow an incorrect payment and propose a practical mitigation.

  • Catalog supplies: e.g., receipt not required → mitigate with periodic audit or spend analytics.
  • Urgent part: e.g., after-the-fact approvals → mitigate with emergency approval log and threshold limits.
  • Blanket PO services: e.g., weak service acceptance → mitigate with standardized monthly acceptance checklist.
  • Capex equipment: e.g., unclear milestones → mitigate with explicit acceptance criteria and holdback line.
  • Return/credit: e.g., unapplied credits → mitigate with credit aging report and mandatory invoice/credit linkage fields.

Now answer the exercise about the content:

In a recurring service paid under a blanket PO (e.g., monthly cleaning), what combination typically makes the invoice eligible for payment?

You are right! Congratulations, now go to the next page

You missed! Try again.

Recurring services typically require monthly proof of performance. Payment is released when service acceptance is approved and the invoice references the correct period and BPO, staying within the remaining balance.

Free Ebook cover Purchasing Management Fundamentals: From Request to Payment
100%

Purchasing Management Fundamentals: From Request to Payment

New course

10 pages

Download the app to earn free Certification and listen to the courses in the background, even with the screen off.