Free Ebook cover Technical Analysis Foundations: Charts, Trends, Support/Resistance, and Indicators

Technical Analysis Foundations: Charts, Trends, Support/Resistance, and Indicators

New course

10 pages

Technical Analysis Foundations: Core Chart Patterns and How to Validate Them

Capítulo 8

Estimated reading time: 12 minutes

+ Exercise

What a “Chart Pattern” Really Is (and Isn’t)

A chart pattern is a repeatable market structure that reflects a temporary balance between buyers and sellers, followed by a resolution. Patterns are not predictions; they are conditional setups with defined triggers and defined failure points. Your job is to treat each pattern as a hypothesis: “If price breaks and holds beyond this boundary, then continuation/transition is more likely; if it fails, I’m wrong.”

To keep patterns actionable, break every pattern into the same four components:

  • Prior trend: what direction and strength preceded the pattern (continuation patterns require a clear impulse).
  • Consolidation boundaries: the lines/levels that contain price while it pauses (the “shape” of the pattern).
  • Breakout trigger: the condition that turns the pattern from “candidate” to “confirmed.”
  • Invalidation: the price action that proves the pattern failed (where you exit or avoid entry).

Pattern Quality Checklist (Use Before You Trade)

1) Symmetry and proportionality

Higher-quality patterns look “organized”: swings are reasonably proportional, boundaries are respected, and the consolidation doesn’t sprawl randomly. A flag that is longer than the impulse that created it, or a head-and-shoulders with wildly uneven shoulders, is lower quality.

2) Number of touches

Boundaries should be validated by multiple reactions. As a rule of thumb, look for at least two touches on each boundary (or one clear touch plus a clean internal structure). More touches can improve confidence, but too many can also weaken the level by “using up” liquidity—so prioritize clean touches over many messy ones.

3) Volume behavior (as a supporting clue)

During consolidation, volume often contracts; on breakout, volume often expands. Treat this as a quality filter, not a requirement. If volume expands strongly against the breakout direction, be cautious.

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...
Download App

Download the app

4) Breakout follow-through

A breakout is not “real” just because price pokes beyond a line. Higher-quality breakouts show:

  • Close beyond the boundary (not just an intrabar wick).
  • Follow-through within the next 1–3 bars (timeframe-dependent).
  • Optional retest behavior: price returns to the broken boundary and holds (support becomes support in an upside break; resistance becomes resistance in a downside break).

Measuring Expectations Responsibly (Targets as Reference, Not Certainty)

Many patterns come with “measured moves.” Use them as reference points for planning, not as guarantees. A practical way to use targets responsibly:

  • Define a primary reference target (the measured move).
  • Define a nearby friction area (where price may stall) and plan partial profits or tighter management there.
  • Size and manage the trade so that if the target is never reached, the loss is still acceptable.

In other words: you don’t need certainty; you need a setup where the risk is known and the potential reward is plausible.

Continuation Patterns

Flags

Concept: A flag is a brief consolidation that slopes slightly against the prior impulse (or moves sideways), typically after a sharp move. It represents a pause where the market digests gains/losses before attempting continuation.

Components

  • Prior trend: a clear, strong impulse (the “flagpole”).
  • Consolidation boundaries: a small channel or rectangle that contains price.
  • Breakout trigger: close beyond the flag boundary in the direction of the prior trend.
  • Invalidation: price closes back inside after breakout and/or breaks the opposite side of the flag (depending on entry style).

Validation rules (step-by-step)

  1. Confirm the flagpole: identify a sharp move with minimal overlap (impulse behavior). If the move is choppy, the “flag” is often just a range.
  2. Draw boundaries: connect at least two swing highs for the upper line and two swing lows for the lower line (or use a rectangle if it’s flat).
  3. Write invalidation first: for a bullish flag, invalidation is typically below the lower flag boundary (or below the most recent swing low inside the flag). For a bearish flag, invalidation is above the upper boundary.
  4. Define confirmation: require a close beyond the boundary in the trend direction. Optional: require a retest that holds (price touches the broken line and rejects back in the breakout direction).
  5. Assess risk: if the distance from entry to invalidation is too large relative to a reasonable reference target, skip it.

Measured expectation (reference target)

A common reference is the flagpole length projected from the breakout point. Use it as a planning guide; if nearby friction is closer than the measured move, treat that closer area as the first decision point.

Pennants

Concept: A pennant is a small symmetrical consolidation (like a tiny triangle) that forms after a strong impulse. It reflects tightening volatility before continuation.

Components

  • Prior trend: strong impulse into the pennant.
  • Consolidation boundaries: converging trendlines (lower highs and higher lows).
  • Breakout trigger: close beyond the pennant boundary in the direction of the impulse.
  • Invalidation: break of the opposite boundary or a close back inside after breakout.

Validation rules

  1. Impulse first: pennants without a clear impulse are often just triangles in a range.
  2. Convergence should be clear: at least two touches on each side, with swings compressing.
  3. Time matters: pennants are usually brief relative to the impulse. If it drags on, it becomes a different structure.
  4. Confirmation: close beyond boundary + follow-through. Optional retest that holds.
  5. Invalidation: define the opposite boundary as the “line in the sand.”

Measured expectation (reference target)

Often the impulse length projected from the breakout, similar to flags. Keep it as a reference; manage around nearby friction.

Triangles (Ascending, Descending, Symmetrical)

Concept: A triangle is a consolidation where price compresses between converging boundaries. Triangles can act as continuation patterns when they form after a trend, but they can also be neutral—so validation is essential.

Types and what they imply

  • Ascending triangle: flat top with rising lows (often resolves upward, but not guaranteed).
  • Descending triangle: flat bottom with falling highs (often resolves downward, but not guaranteed).
  • Symmetrical triangle: lower highs and higher lows (directional bias depends more on context and breakout).

Components

  • Prior trend: ideally present if you’re treating it as continuation.
  • Consolidation boundaries: two converging lines; one may be flat in ascending/descending triangles.
  • Breakout trigger: close beyond boundary + follow-through.
  • Invalidation: break of the opposite boundary or failed breakout (close back inside and continuation against you).

Validation rules (practical)

  1. Draw the triangle correctly: use swing points, not random wicks. You want a boundary that price has clearly respected.
  2. Count touches: aim for at least two touches on each side. A triangle with only one touch per side is a guess.
  3. Watch compression: swings should narrow; if volatility expands, it’s not compressing.
  4. Define confirmation: close beyond the boundary. For conservative confirmation, require a retest that holds or a second close beyond the boundary.
  5. Set invalidation: typically beyond the opposite boundary (or beyond the last swing inside the triangle, if you need tighter risk).

Measured expectation (reference target)

A common reference is the height of the triangle’s base (widest part) projected from the breakout point. Use it as a planning reference, not a promise.

Reversal / Transition Patterns

Double Top and Double Bottom

Concept: A double top is a transition pattern where price fails twice near a similar high, suggesting buyers are losing control. A double bottom is the mirror image. These patterns are best treated as reversal candidates that require confirmation via the “neckline.”

Components

  • Prior trend: double top ideally forms after an uptrend; double bottom after a downtrend.
  • Consolidation boundaries: two peaks (tops) or two troughs (bottoms) with a reaction swing between them.
  • Breakout trigger: close beyond the neckline (the reaction swing low for double top; reaction swing high for double bottom).
  • Invalidation: price reclaims the neckline after breakout and/or breaks above the double top peaks (for shorts) / below the double bottom troughs (for longs), depending on entry.

Validation rules (step-by-step)

  1. Identify the two tests: the two peaks/troughs should be reasonably similar in price. Perfect equality is not required; “close enough” is acceptable if structure is clean.
  2. Define the neckline: mark the reaction swing between the two tests. This is the key level for confirmation.
  3. Write invalidation first: if you plan to trade the neckline break, invalidation is commonly back above the neckline after a downside break (double top) or back below the neckline after an upside break (double bottom). More conservative invalidation can be beyond the second peak/trough, but that increases risk.
  4. Define confirmation: require a close beyond the neckline. Optional: require a retest of the neckline that holds (price returns to neckline and rejects in the breakout direction).
  5. Check follow-through: if price breaks the neckline and immediately snaps back, treat it as a failed break unless a second break occurs with better structure.

Measured expectation (reference target)

A common reference is the height from the peaks/troughs to the neckline, projected from the breakout point. Use it to estimate whether reward is plausible relative to your invalidation distance.

Head and Shoulders (and Inverse Head and Shoulders)

Concept: Head and shoulders is a transition pattern where a trend loses momentum: a left shoulder forms, then a higher high (the head), then a lower high (the right shoulder). The inverse version appears after downtrends. The pattern is confirmed by a break of the neckline.

Components

  • Prior trend: uptrend for head and shoulders; downtrend for inverse.
  • Consolidation boundaries: three swing points (shoulder–head–shoulder) plus a neckline connecting the reaction lows (or highs for inverse).
  • Breakout trigger: close beyond the neckline.
  • Invalidation: reclaim of neckline after breakout and/or break above right-shoulder high (for short) / below right-shoulder low (for long), depending on entry approach.

Pattern quality criteria specific to head and shoulders

  • Shoulder symmetry: shoulders should be similar in height and duration (not identical, but comparable).
  • Clean neckline: the neckline should be definable from clear reaction points; if you can draw three different necklines, it’s low clarity.
  • Right shoulder behavior: often shows weaker push (less distance, slower progress). If the right shoulder is stronger than the head, the pattern is suspect.

Validation rules (step-by-step)

  1. Mark left shoulder, head, right shoulder: use obvious swing highs/lows, not minor noise.
  2. Draw the neckline: connect the two reaction lows (for standard) or reaction highs (for inverse). The neckline may slope.
  3. Write invalidation first: if entering on neckline break, a practical invalidation is a close back above the neckline (for standard) after the break. A more structural invalidation is above the right shoulder high, but that increases risk.
  4. Define confirmation: close beyond neckline + follow-through. Optional: neckline retest that holds.
  5. Evaluate follow-through: if the break occurs but price cannot extend away from the neckline, downgrade the setup.

Measured expectation (reference target)

A common reference is the distance from the head to the neckline, projected from the breakout point. Treat it as a reference; manage around nearby friction and do not assume full completion.

A Repeatable Practice Structure (Use This Template)

Step 1: Identify the pattern candidate

Write a one-line label and context statement:

  • Pattern: e.g., “Bull flag,” “Symmetrical triangle,” “Double top,” “Head and shoulders.”
  • Context: “Formed after strong impulse up,” or “After extended uptrend showing slowing pushes,” etc.

Step 2: Write the invalidation point first

Before thinking about targets, decide what price action proves you wrong. Put it in a single sentence and a single level/condition:

  • Boundary break invalidation: “If price closes below the lower flag boundary, the setup is invalid.”
  • Neckline reclaim invalidation: “If price closes back above the neckline after breaking down, the breakdown is invalid.”

This step forces discipline: if you cannot define invalidation clearly, you do not have a tradable pattern—only a drawing.

Step 3: Define confirmation (trigger + retest criteria)

Use explicit rules so you don’t “feel” your way into entries:

  • Trigger: “Enter only after a candle close beyond the boundary/neckline.”
  • Retest criteria (optional but powerful): “If price retests the broken line, it must hold: wicks through are acceptable, but closes back inside the pattern are not.”
  • Follow-through check: “If there is no progress within the next N bars (choose N appropriate to your timeframe), reduce confidence or skip.”

Step 4: Evaluate whether the setup is worth taking (risk-first)

Convert the pattern into a risk proposition:

  • Risk distance: entry to invalidation (this is your core cost).
  • Reference reward: measured move target and/or nearest plausible objective.
  • Is it worth it? If the reference reward is not meaningfully larger than the risk, or if the structure is messy (poor symmetry, weak touches, no follow-through), pass.

Trade planning worksheet (copy/paste)

Pattern candidate: ____________________________  Timeframe: ____________  Symbol: ____________
Prior trend / context (1 sentence): _______________________________________________
Boundaries / neckline defined by: _________________________________________________

Invalidation (write first): _______________________________________________________
Confirmation trigger (close beyond what?): ________________________________________
Retest rule (what must hold?): ___________________________________________________

Entry idea (after confirmation): _________________________________________________
Reference target (measured move): ________________________________________________
Nearest friction area before target: _____________________________________________

Risk distance (entry → invalidation): ____________
Is follow-through present (yes/no)? ____________
Quality score (symmetry, touches, volume, clarity): _______________________________
Decision (take / skip / wait for retest): ________________________________________

Common Validation Mistakes to Avoid

  • Trading the drawing, not the trigger: entering inside the pattern before a close beyond the boundary turns many “patterns” into random trades.
  • Ignoring invalidation: if you can’t say where you’re wrong, you’re not managing risk—you’re hoping.
  • Overtrusting measured moves: targets are references; price can stall early, overshoot, or reverse.
  • Forcing low-quality symmetry: if boundaries require constant adjustment, the market is not respecting the structure.
  • Calling every consolidation a flag/pennant: continuation patterns require a clear impulse; otherwise you’re often just in a range.

Now answer the exercise about the content:

Which action best confirms a chart pattern breakout according to the validation rules?

You are right! Congratulations, now go to the next page

You missed! Try again.

A breakout is higher quality when price closes beyond the boundary/neckline and shows follow-through soon after. A wick alone is not enough, and volume is a helpful filter but not a requirement.

Next chapter

Technical Analysis Foundations: Combining Tools into a Simple, Repeatable Signal Process

Arrow Right Icon
Download the app to earn free Certification and listen to the courses in the background, even with the screen off.