Political Power: Violence, Economic Power, Ideology, and Structural Control

Power as the Capacity to Shape Choices and Outcomes

In political philosophy, power can be defined as the capacity to shape what people can do, what they will do, and what happens as a result. Power is not only about issuing commands; it includes setting the menu of options, influencing what counts as “reasonable,” and structuring environments so that some outcomes become likely and others become difficult or invisible.

A useful way to keep the concept precise is to separate: (1) choices (what options are available and attractive), (2) outcomes (what actually happens), and (3) mechanisms (how choices and outcomes are shaped). The same outcome (e.g., people leaving a neighborhood) can be produced by different mechanisms (police pressure, rent increases, zoning rules, or cultural stigma). Identifying the mechanism matters for democratic control.

Four Forms of Power

1) Coercive Power (Force and Threat)

Coercive power shapes behavior through the use of force or the credible threat of force. It includes direct physical violence, legal penalties, detention, and intimidation. Coercion can be overt (arrest, eviction by police) or subtle (selective enforcement, “random” checks, harassment).

• Mechanism: raising the cost of disobedience through punishment or harm.
• Typical channels: police, courts, prisons, border control, private security, armed groups.
• Practical example: A city increases fines for sleeping in public. Even without mass arrests, the threat of fines and confiscation pushes unhoused people out of visible areas.

2) Economic Power (Control of Resources)

Economic power shapes choices by controlling resources people need: income, jobs, housing, credit, land, supply chains, and investment. It can operate through markets (prices, wages, interest rates) and through organizational decisions (hiring, scheduling, procurement).

• Mechanism: shaping incentives and constraints by controlling access to necessities and opportunities.
• Typical channels: employers, landlords, banks, insurers, major investors, procurement rules, platform companies.
• Practical example: A dominant employer in a region can suppress wages by setting “industry standard” pay and discouraging unionization, limiting workers’ feasible options.

3) Informational Power (Agenda-Setting and Attention)

Informational power shapes outcomes by controlling what people know, what they notice, and what is treated as a legitimate topic. It includes agenda-setting (what gets discussed), framing (how it is described), and data control (what is measured and disclosed). Informational power can be exercised by governments, corporations, media, and professional experts.

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• Mechanism: shaping beliefs and priorities by filtering information and structuring attention.
• Typical channels: media ownership, platform algorithms, public relations, research funding, official statistics, classification systems.
• Practical example: A health insurer publishes selective performance metrics that make denial rates hard to compare, reducing public pressure for reform.

4) Ideological Power (Beliefs, Norms, and “Common Sense”)

Ideological power shapes what people take to be normal, deserved, possible, or morally acceptable. It works through norms, identity, social expectations, and moral narratives. Ideological power is often strongest when it is least visible—when people experience a social arrangement as “just how things are.”

• Mechanism: shaping preferences and self-understanding, not merely choices among fixed options.
• Typical channels: education, workplace culture, professional norms, advertising, religious and civic narratives, stereotypes.
• Practical example: If poverty is widely framed as personal failure rather than structural constraint, support for social programs may decline even among those who would benefit.

Indirect Power: Institutions and Structural Control

Power is often exercised indirectly, through institutions and social structures that shape behavior without a single identifiable “commander.” This is sometimes called structural power: the way rules, roles, and background conditions systematically advantage some groups and disadvantage others.

How Indirect Power Works

• Rules and procedures: Eligibility criteria, application processes, waiting lists, documentation requirements, and appeals procedures can determine who receives benefits or protection.
• Default settings: What happens if you do nothing (automatic enrollment, opt-out vs opt-in) can shift outcomes without changing anyone’s formal rights.
• Institutional fragmentation: When responsibility is spread across agencies, accountability becomes difficult; problems become “no one’s job.”
• Path dependence: Once infrastructure and systems are built (transport routes, zoning maps, hospital networks), they constrain future choices and distribute opportunities unevenly.
• Professional gatekeeping: Licensing, credentialing, and expert standards can protect quality but also restrict entry and shape whose voices count.

Indirect power can be more durable than direct coercion because it is embedded in routine practices. It can also be harder to contest because it appears neutral (“just policy,” “just the market,” “just the algorithm”).

A Power-Mapping Framework

To analyze power in a concrete policy area, use a structured map with five components: actors, resources, constraints, channels, and accountability mechanisms. The goal is to move from vague claims (“corporations have too much power”) to testable descriptions (“this actor controls this resource, through this channel, with weak oversight”).

Step 1: Identify Actors

List the relevant actors, including both formal and informal ones.

• State actors: legislatures, agencies, regulators, courts, police, public hospitals, housing authorities.
• Market actors: employers, landlords, developers, insurers, banks, platform firms, contractors.
• Civil society: unions, NGOs, professional associations, neighborhood groups, advocacy coalitions.
• Knowledge actors: universities, think tanks, consultants, data brokers, media outlets.
• Everyday actors: residents, patients, workers, tenants, frontline staff.

Step 2: Map Resources

For each actor, list what they control that can shape choices and outcomes.

• Coercive resources: authority to arrest, fine, detain, remove, or sanction.
• Economic resources: money, jobs, property, credit, procurement budgets, market share.
• Informational resources: data, expertise, access to media, ability to set metrics and categories.
• Ideological resources: moral authority, cultural prestige, trusted narratives, legitimacy in the public eye.

Step 3: Identify Constraints

Constraints are what limit an actor’s ability to use their resources.

• Legal constraints: statutes, constitutional limits, due process requirements, labor law.
• Material constraints: budget limits, staffing, infrastructure, supply shortages.
• Political constraints: elections, coalition partners, public opinion, internal dissent.
• Reputational constraints: media scrutiny, professional ethics, consumer backlash.
• Collective action constraints: coordination problems among affected groups (e.g., tenants scattered across buildings).

Step 4: Trace Channels of Influence

Channels are the pathways through which power is exercised. Use the four forms of power to classify channels.

Step 5: Locate Accountability Mechanisms

Accountability mechanisms are how power is monitored, constrained, and corrected. When these are weak, power becomes arbitrary or unresponsive.

• Democratic accountability: elections, legislative oversight, public hearings, participatory budgeting.
• Legal accountability: judicial review, complaint procedures, rights to appeal, transparency laws.
• Administrative accountability: audits, inspector generals, performance standards, ombuds offices.
• Market accountability: competition, consumer choice (often limited in essentials like housing or healthcare).
• Workplace and community accountability: unions, tenant associations, professional ethics boards, community review panels.

Worked Example: Power Mapping in Housing

Actors

• City council and housing department
• Zoning board and planning commission
• Landlords and property management firms
• Developers and construction firms
• Banks and mortgage lenders
• Tenant organizations and legal aid
• Police (in eviction enforcement contexts)

Resources

• Economic: landlords control leases; banks control credit; developers control supply decisions.
• Informational: planning agencies control data on vacancies and permits; landlords may control maintenance records.
• Coercive: courts and sheriffs enforce evictions; inspectors can impose fines.
• Ideological: narratives about “neighborhood character,” “undeserving tenants,” or “property rights” shape policy acceptability.

Channels

• Economic channel: rent increases, application fees, credit score requirements.
• Informational channel: technical planning documents that are hard for residents to interpret; selective reporting of crime statistics.
• Ideological channel: stigma against public housing; framing density as “decline.”
• Coercive channel: eviction processes, enforcement of loitering or camping bans that displace people.

Accountability points

• Public disclosure of eviction filings and rent increases (informational accountability)
• Right to counsel in eviction court (legal accountability)
• Tenant unions and collective bargaining with landlords (economic counter-power)
• Participatory planning processes with binding community benefits agreements (democratic accountability)

Exercises: Map Power Relations and Identify Points for Democratic Control

Exercise 1: Choose a Policy Area and Define the Outcome

Select one area: housing, healthcare, or labor. Write a one-sentence outcome you want to explain.

• Housing example: “Why are rents rising faster than wages in my city?”
• Healthcare example: “Why do patients face long waits for specialist care?”
• Labor example: “Why is scheduling unpredictable in retail jobs?”

Step-by-step:

• Write the outcome in measurable terms (who is affected, where, over what time period).
• List 2–3 indicators you would use (rent-to-income ratio, denial rates, turnover, injury rates).

Exercise 2: Actor Inventory (10-minute scan)

Create a table with three columns: Actor, Role, Decision points.

Actor | Role | Decision points (what they can decide or block)

Step-by-step:

• List at least 8 actors (include at least 2 state, 3 market, 2 civil society, 1 knowledge actor).
• For each actor, write one concrete decision they influence (e.g., “sets reimbursement rates,” “approves permits,” “sets shift schedules”).

Exercise 3: Resource and Dependency Map

For each actor, identify their top two resources and who depends on them.

Step-by-step:

• Label each resource as coercive, economic, informational, or ideological.
• Draw arrows: A → B if B depends on A’s resource.
• Circle “chokepoints” where many arrows converge (single insurer, single employer, single permitting office).

Exercise 4: Channels and Mechanisms (from “who” to “how”)

Pick two chokepoints and describe the mechanism precisely.

• Template: “Actor X uses resource Y through channel Z to increase/decrease option O for group G, producing outcome Q.”

Example (labor): “A platform employer uses informational resources (algorithmic ratings) through scheduling software to reduce workers’ ability to refuse shifts, increasing compliance and lowering labor costs.”

Exercise 5: Accountability Audit

For each major actor, answer these questions.

• Transparency: What must they disclose? To whom? How often?
• Answerability: Who can demand explanations (courts, regulators, unions, the public)?
• Enforcement: What happens if they violate rules (fines, license loss, contract termination)?
• Voice: How can affected people participate (hearings, boards, collective bargaining, complaints)?

Step-by-step:

• Score each actor from 0–2 on each dimension (0 = weak/none, 2 = strong).
• Identify the lowest-scoring dimension overall; that is your first target for reform.

Exercise 6: Identify Points for Democratic Control (Design Options)

Using your map, propose interventions that match the form of power being exercised. Aim for at least one intervention per form.

• Coercive power controls: clear enforcement standards, limits on discretion, independent review boards, body-worn camera policies with privacy safeguards, diversion programs.
• Economic power controls: anti-monopoly enforcement, public options, wage boards, rent stabilization, procurement rules favoring fair labor, community land trusts.
• Informational power controls: transparency requirements, open data, audit rights for algorithms, standardized reporting metrics, conflict-of-interest disclosures.
• Ideological power controls: anti-stigma public campaigns, inclusive curriculum standards, professional training, narrative reframing in official communications, representation in decision-making bodies.

Step-by-step:

• Choose one chokepoint and write two reforms: one that increases transparency and one that increases participation.
• For each reform, specify: (1) who implements it, (2) what changes in practice, (3) how success is measured.

Exercise 7: Stress-Test Your Map (Counterfactuals)

Power maps improve when you test them against “what if” scenarios.

Step-by-step:

• Pick one actor you think is central. Ask: “If this actor disappeared or changed behavior, would the outcome change?”
• If the answer is no, your map is missing a deeper structural mechanism (e.g., zoning constraints, financing rules, professional gatekeeping).
• Revise the map by adding the structural constraint and the institution that maintains it.