Payables (Accounts Payable): Supplier Terms, Cash Preservation, and Relationship Management

1) Purchasing on terms: how payables are created and why they preserve cash

Accounts payable (AP) arises when a company receives goods or services now and pays later under agreed supplier terms. From a cash perspective, AP is a form of short-term financing provided by suppliers: the business can operate, sell, and potentially collect cash from customers before it must pay the supplier.

Mechanics: the payable is typically recognized when the supplier invoice is received (or when goods/services are received, depending on accounting policy and controls). Cash leaves the business only when the invoice is paid.

• Day 0: Purchase order issued (commitment, not yet a payable).
• Day 5: Goods received; receiving report created (operational evidence).
• Day 7: Supplier invoice received; AP records the invoice (payable created).
• Day 37: Invoice paid (cash outflow).

In this timeline, the company effectively uses supplier credit for ~30 days (from invoice date to payment date). If the company sells the goods and collects cash before Day 37, AP helps fund operations without drawing on bank lines.

Practical step-by-step: mapping AP to cash timing

1. List major spend categories (raw materials, packaging, freight, subcontractors, IT, rent, utilities).
2. For each category, capture the term structure: invoice date, due date, discount window, and whether terms are based on invoice date, receipt date, or end-of-month (EOM).
3. Estimate payment behavior (pay early, on due date, or late) and quantify the cash impact by week in the cash forecast.
4. Identify “cash-critical” suppliers where late payment could disrupt supply; treat these differently from low-criticality vendors.

2) Common supplier terms and why they vary by industry and supplier power

Supplier terms define when payment is due and whether discounts or penalties apply. Terms are not purely “finance”; they reflect bargaining power, competitive dynamics, product criticality, and supplier funding costs.

Why terms differ by industry

• Manufacturing/industrial: net terms are common; critical components may have shorter terms or require deposits.
• Retail/consumer goods: EOM structures and longer terms can appear for large retailers; chargebacks and deductions are common, increasing dispute risk.
• Services and professional fees: net 15 or net 30 is common; fewer “hard” delivery proofs can complicate approvals.
• Logistics/freight: shorter terms are common; service continuity is sensitive to payment behavior.

Supplier power and continuity of supply

Even if a buyer wants to “use AP as financing,” the supplier may not tolerate extended payment if:

Continue in our app.

• Listen to the audio with the screen off.
• Earn a certificate upon completion.
• Over 5000 courses for you to explore!

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• the supplier is smaller and cash-constrained,
• the product is scarce or capacity is tight,
• switching suppliers is costly or slow,
• the supplier can reallocate supply to faster-paying customers.

In practice, the usable financing from AP is capped by the supplier’s willingness to continue shipping on those terms.

3) Early-payment discounts vs. paying on due date: evaluating the trade-off under cash constraints

Early-payment discounts can be economically attractive, but only if the company can process invoices fast enough and has sufficient liquidity. The decision is a trade-off between (a) saving money via discount and (b) preserving cash for other needs (payroll, taxes, inventory buys, debt service).

Step-by-step: evaluate a discount offer

1. Identify the discount and window (e.g., 2/10, Net 30).
2. Compute the incremental days of financing: due date minus discount date (e.g., 30 − 10 = 20 days).
3. Compute the implied annualized return of taking the discount (approximation):

   Implied annual return ≈ (Discount % / (1 − Discount %)) × (365 / Extra days)

4. Compare to your marginal cost of cash: revolver interest rate, internal hurdle rate, or the opportunity cost of missing other payments.
5. Check operational feasibility: can you approve and pay within the discount window without errors?

Example: 2/10, Net 30

Discount = 2%; extra days = 20.

Implied annual return ≈ (0.02 / 0.98) × (365 / 20) ≈ 0.02041 × 18.25 ≈ 37.2%

If the company’s marginal short-term borrowing cost is, for example, 10–12% annualized, taking the discount is financially compelling if cash is available and the process can reliably pay within 10 days.

Cash constraint reality: when paying on due date is rational

Even when the implied return is high, a company may still choose to pay on the due date (or negotiate different terms) when:

• Liquidity is tight and early payment would force overdrafts, missed payroll, or covenant pressure.
• Discount capture is unreliable due to slow approvals or frequent invoice disputes (risk of paying early incorrectly).
• Supplier is non-critical and the company prioritizes cash for critical suppliers.

A practical approach is to segment suppliers: capture discounts for high-confidence, high-volume vendors where processing is clean; pay on due date for others.

4) Supplier performance and operational risk: why stretching payables can backfire

“Stretching payables” (paying later than agreed) can preserve cash in the short term, but it can create operational risk that ultimately costs more than the cash saved. Suppliers respond to payment behavior, especially when they have alternatives.

Performance dimensions that matter

• Lead times: late payment can push you to the back of the production or shipping queue.
• Quality: suppliers under financial stress may cut corners, or you may lose access to their best capacity.
• Criticality: a single-source component or regulated input has a much higher “cost of disruption.”
• Flexibility: suppliers may stop expediting, reduce safety stock, or refuse small-batch runs.

Operational consequences of chronic late payment

• Shipment holds until past-due invoices are cleared.
• Term tightening (moving from net 30 to COD, deposits, or progress payments).
• Price increases or removal of rebates/allowances to compensate for financing burden.
• Reduced allocation during shortages, harming revenue continuity.

Practical step-by-step: decide whether it is safe to extend payment timing

1. Classify suppliers by criticality (A = production-stopping, B = important but substitutable, C = easily substitutable).
2. Assess supplier financial sensitivity (small/private, high leverage, signs of cash strain) and market tightness (scarce vs. commoditized).
3. Quantify disruption cost: estimate revenue at risk per day of stockout or downtime; compare to cash preserved by delaying payment.
4. Set payment policies by segment: A suppliers paid on time (or early if discount is attractive); B suppliers managed to due date; C suppliers may be candidates for negotiated extensions (not unilateral lateness).
5. Prefer negotiation over stretching: request extended terms formally (e.g., net 45 instead of net 30) in exchange for volume commitments, forecast visibility, or partial early payments.

The key distinction is agreed terms versus late payment. Agreed extensions preserve relationships; chronic lateness damages them.

5) Invoice accuracy, approvals, and three-way match: preventing late fees and duplicate payments

AP is only a reliable source of financing when the process is controlled. Poor invoice handling can cause late fees, missed discounts, duplicate payments, and supplier disputes—each of which erodes cash and credibility.

Core control: three-way match

Three-way match compares:

• Purchase Order (PO): what was ordered, price, quantities, terms.
• Receiving document (GRN/packing slip/service acceptance): what was received.
• Supplier invoice: what is being billed.

Payment is approved when the three align within defined tolerances (e.g., quantity variance, price variance, freight rules).

Step-by-step: a practical AP workflow that reduces fees and errors

1. PO discipline: require POs for spend categories where quantities/prices can be pre-approved; define exceptions (e.g., utilities).
2. Receipt confirmation: ensure warehouse or requestor confirms receipt promptly; for services, require a service entry/acceptance step.
3. Invoice capture: centralize invoice intake (dedicated email/portal) to avoid lost invoices and uncontrolled approvals.
4. Automated matching: match invoice to PO and receipt; route exceptions (price mismatch, missing receipt) to the right owner.
5. Approval SLAs: set time limits (e.g., 48 hours for non-exception invoices; 5 business days for exceptions) to avoid missing due dates or discount windows.
6. Payment scheduling: batch payments based on due dates, discount opportunities, and cash forecast; avoid ad-hoc urgent wires that increase error risk.
7. Duplicate prevention: use system controls (unique invoice number by vendor, duplicate checks on amount/date, vendor bank validation).
8. Vendor master governance: restrict who can create/modify vendors and bank details; require independent verification to reduce fraud and misdirected payments.
9. Reconciliation and dispute loop: reconcile statements, track credits/debit memos, and close disputes quickly so “blocked” invoices don’t become late.

Example: how process speed enables discount capture

A supplier offers 1/10, Net 30. If invoices sit unapproved for 12 days, the discount is impossible to take even if cash is available. By enforcing receipt confirmation and approval SLAs, the company turns a theoretical discount into a repeatable cash saving.

Common root causes of late fees (and fixes)