What “Creative Research” Means on TikTok (and Why It’s Different)
Creative research on TikTok is the process of systematically studying what is already working in your category—then extracting repeatable patterns you can adapt into your own ads. The goal is not to copy ads; it’s to identify angles (what the ad is saying) and patterns (how the ad is constructed) so you can write better scripts and briefs faster.
On TikTok, performance often comes from clarity: a clear hook, a clear promise, clear proof, and a clear next step—delivered in a native creator style. Research helps you find the simplest, most understandable way to communicate your offer using formats viewers already accept.
Two outputs you’re aiming for
- Angle library: pain points, desires, objections, and promises that repeatedly show up in winning ads.
- Pattern library: recurring structures (hook types, pacing, cuts, overlays, proof moments, CTAs) that make those angles land.
A Repeatable 60–90 Minute Creative Research Method
Use this method weekly. It’s designed to produce a swipe file that directly feeds scripting.
Step 1: Build a competitor set (10–20 brands)
Pick direct competitors (same product type) and indirect competitors (same audience problem). Include a few “adjacent” categories that sell to the same mindset (e.g., skincare and supplements both sell transformation and routine).
- Direct: same promise, same price band.
- Indirect: solves the same pain point differently.
- Adjacent: sells to the same identity (busy moms, gym beginners, remote workers).
Step 2: Collect ads (20–40 examples)
Save ads you see in-feed and also look at brand accounts and creator posts that feel like ads. Your goal is volume with light filtering: collect anything that appears to be a serious attempt to sell (not just entertainment).
Continue in our app.
You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.
Or continue reading below...Download the app
As you collect, capture:
- Video link or filename
- Brand/creator handle
- Product and offer details (price, bundle, trial, guarantee if visible)
- First 2 seconds (what happens visually and verbally)
- Any proof elements (reviews, demos, before/after, expert claim)
Step 3: Identify recurring hooks (the “opening move”)
Watch the first 3 seconds of each ad and label the hook type. Don’t overthink it—use a small set of categories so patterns emerge.
| Hook type | What it sounds/looks like | When it works best |
|---|---|---|
| Problem callout | “If you’re dealing with X…” | High-awareness pain, urgent fixes |
| Big promise | “Here’s how to get Y without Z” | Clear outcome, strong differentiation |
| Contrarian | “Stop doing this…” | Category myths, crowded markets |
| Proof-first | Shows results immediately | Visual products, transformations |
| Demo-first | Product in action instantly | Gadgets, tools, beauty, food |
| Story setup | “I didn’t believe this until…” | Higher consideration, trust needed |
| Objection flip | “I thought it was a scam…” | Skeptical audiences |
Pattern to look for: winning ads often combine two hooks: a visual hook (what you see) plus a verbal hook (what you hear/read).
Step 4: Note creator styles (delivery formats that feel native)
Creator style is the “container” that makes the message believable. Tag each ad with a creator style so you can brief the right type of UGC later.
- Direct-to-camera explainer: fast, confident, “here’s what I learned.”
- Routine / day-in-the-life: product appears naturally in a sequence.
- GRWM / prep format: talk + action, great for benefits and objections.
- POV / skit: dramatizes the pain point and the fix.
- Unboxing / first impression: curiosity + tactile proof.
- Comparison: “old way vs new way,” “Brand A vs Brand B.”
- Testimonial montage: multiple voices, quick cuts, social proof.
Also note delivery traits:
- Energy level (calm vs hype)
- Camera distance (close-up face vs wide)
- Setting (bathroom, car, kitchen, gym)
- Authenticity cues (messy hair, natural lighting, imperfect takes)
Step 5: Map pain points to benefits (turn “why they care” into “what they get”)
For each ad, write the pain point in the audience’s words, then map it to the benefit and mechanism (how it works). This is where you find angles you can own.
| Pain point (what they feel) | Benefit (what they get) | Mechanism (why it works) | Angle example |
|---|---|---|---|
| “I don’t have time.” | Fast result with minimal steps | Pre-built routine / automation | “2-minute routine that replaces 5 products” |
| “Nothing works for me.” | Works for specific edge cases | Designed for sensitive / beginners | “Made for people who’ve tried everything” |
| “I’m embarrassed.” | Confidence / social safety | Discreet, easy, predictable | “Fix it before anyone notices” |
| “I’m worried it’s unsafe.” | Peace of mind | Testing, certifications, transparent ingredients | “Here’s what’s inside and why it matters” |
Tip: If you can’t clearly write the mechanism, your script will drift into vague claims. Research helps you find the simplest believable “because.”
Step 6: Collect visual patterns (how the ad is built)
Now watch the full ad and log the construction choices. You’re looking for repeatable editing and clarity patterns, not fancy production.
- Cuts: how often does the shot change? (e.g., every 0.5–1.5 seconds in high-energy ads)
- Overlays: captions, bullet points, “before/after,” checklists, price callouts
- Pacing: does it front-load the promise? does it delay the product reveal?
- Proof moments: where does proof appear (second 3, second 8, end)?
- Product visibility: always on screen vs revealed later
- Audio strategy: voiceover vs talking head vs silent text-led
- Structure: Hook → Problem → Promise → Demo → Proof → Offer → CTA (or variations)
When you find an ad that feels “obviously effective,” write down its timeline in seconds. Example:
0:00–0:02 Visual proof (result) + text “I tried X for 7 days” 0:02–0:05 Problem statement (who it’s for) 0:05–0:10 Demo steps (1–2–3) 0:10–0:14 Proof (review screenshot / metric) 0:14–0:18 Offer detail (bundle/discount) 0:18–0:22 CTA (what to do next)How to Build a Swipe File That Actually Helps You Script
A swipe file is only useful if it’s searchable and comparable. The fastest way is a spreadsheet or database with consistent tags.
Swipe file fields (minimum viable)
- Link / file: where to find the ad
- Category: your product type
- Creator style: explainer, routine, POV, etc.
- Hook type: problem, promise, proof-first, contrarian, etc.
- Promise: the main outcome in one sentence
- Proof: what evidence is shown (demo, testimonial, data, authority)
- Objection handled: price, time, skepticism, safety, complexity
- CTA: what action is asked (shop now, learn more, comment, etc.)
- Visual patterns: cuts, overlays, pacing notes
- Notes: what you’d adapt for your brand
Tagging system (simple but powerful)
Use short tags so you can filter quickly. Example tag set:
HOOK_problem,HOOK_proof,HOOK_contrarianPROMISE_speed,PROMISE_savings,PROMISE_confidencePROOF_demo,PROOF_reviews,PROOF_expert,PROOF_dataOBJ_price,OBJ_time,OBJ_safety,OBJ_resultsCTA_shop,CTA_learn,CTA_bundleEDIT_fastcuts,EDIT_textled,EDIT_splitScreen
Rule: every saved ad must have at least 1 tag in each of these buckets: Hook, Promise, Proof, Objection, CTA. If you can’t tag it, it’s not clear enough to learn from.
Turning Trends Into Brand-Safe Executions (Clarity Over Virality)
Trends can help you borrow attention, but your ad still has to communicate the offer clearly. Use trends as a format, not as the message.
A safe way to translate a trend
- Keep: the pacing, the shot style, the meme structure, the transition idea.
- Replace: the words, the scenario, and any risky claims with your brand’s compliant message.
- Anchor: the first 2 seconds to a clear problem or proof moment tied to your product.
Trend translation checklist
- Does the viewer understand what the product is by second 5–7?
- Is the promise specific (not “life-changing,” but what changes and for whom)?
- Is proof shown or described in a believable way?
- Are you avoiding exaggerated or unverifiable claims?
- Would this still work with the sound off (captions/overlays)?
Examples of “format borrowing” (without copying)
| Trend format | What you borrow | Brand-safe adaptation |
|---|---|---|
| Fast “3 things I learned” | List pacing + jump cuts | “3 mistakes people make with [problem] (and what to do instead)” |
| Before/after reveal | Reveal structure | Show process + realistic outcome + time frame you can support |
| POV skit | Relatable scenario | Use a common pain point moment, then demonstrate the fix |
| Routine montage | Sequence + satisfaction | Show steps, label benefits per step, end with offer + CTA |
Clarity rule: if a trend forces you to hide the product or delay the point, it’s entertainment-first. For ads, prioritize comprehension and proof.
Research Worksheet (Feeds Directly Into Scripting)
Use this worksheet for each ad you save. It forces you to extract the parts you’ll reuse in your own scripts.
Ad Breakdown Worksheet (copy/paste)
1) Source - Brand/Creator: - Link/File: - Category: 2) Hook (0–3s) - Hook type (choose one): - Exact hook line (verbatim if possible): - Visual hook (what we see): 3) Audience + Pain Point - Who is this for? - What pain/desire is being activated? (write in audience language): 4) Promise - Main promise in one sentence: - Timeframe mentioned (if any): - Specificity score (1–5): 5) Mechanism (the “because”) - Why does it work? (simple explanation): - What is unique/different vs alternatives?: 6) Proof - Proof type(s): demo / reviews / data / authority / UGC montage - Where does proof appear? (timestamp): - Strongest proof asset used: 7) Objections handled - Which objection is addressed? price / time / safety / skepticism / complexity - How is it answered? (line or visual): 8) Offer + CTA - Offer details shown (bundle, discount, guarantee, etc.): - CTA wording and placement (timestamp): 9) Visual/Editing Patterns - Cut frequency (slow/medium/fast): - Overlays used (captions, bullets, callouts): - Structure (sequence of beats): 10) Script Seeds (what you’ll reuse) - Angle to test (one sentence): - 3 hook variations you could write from this: a) b) c) - Proof you can realistically show for your brand: - One objection you must address in your version:How to turn worksheets into scripts (fast)
- Pick 3 worksheets with the same promise but different hook types to generate hook variations.
- Pick 3 worksheets with the same hook type but different proof to plan proof assets.
- Combine: best hook + clearest promise + strongest proof moment + one objection answer into a first draft script outline.