Avoiding Common Risks: Compliance, Brand Safety, and Fraud Prevention

Why risk management matters in influencer campaigns

Influencer marketing risk management is the set of controls you use to ensure sponsored content is (1) legally compliant, (2) safe for your brand reputation, and (3) protected from fraud and manipulation. The goal is not to eliminate risk entirely; it is to reduce the likelihood of preventable issues and to respond quickly when something goes wrong.

Three risk categories show up repeatedly:

• Compliance risk: missing/unclear disclosures, misleading claims, improper endorsements, or non-compliant targeting.
• Brand safety risk: creators touching sensitive topics, controversial behavior, competitor mentions, or content that conflicts with your values.
• Fraud risk: fake followers, botted engagement, code/link abuse, low-quality traffic, and post-campaign refund/chargeback spikes.

Disclosure and ad compliance (FTC/ASA-style principles)

Core principles to follow

Regulators vary by country, but many follow similar principles (often associated with FTC/ASA-style guidance):

• Clear and conspicuous disclosure: the audience must immediately understand it is an ad/sponsored relationship.
• Disclosure must be hard to miss: placed early, readable, and not buried among hashtags or hidden behind “more.”
• Truthful, substantiated claims: creators cannot make performance, health, financial, or “guaranteed” claims you cannot support.
• No misleading impressions: editing, filters, or selective framing should not imply results that typical customers cannot expect.
• Applies across formats: posts, stories, livestreams, podcasts, newsletters, and affiliate-style content all need appropriate disclosure.

Disclosure labeling: what “good” looks like by format

Use simple labels that audiences recognize. Prefer “Ad” or “Sponsored” over vague tags.

Creator compliance kit (send before content creation)

Provide creators with a one-page compliance kit they can follow without legal interpretation. Include:

Continue in our app.

You can listen to the audiobook with the screen off, receive a free certificate for this course, and also have access to 5,000 other free online courses.

Or continue reading below...

Download the app

• Disclosure rules: exact labels to use, where to place them, and examples per platform.
• Claim boundaries: what they may say vs. may not say (with examples).
• Required qualifiers: e.g., “results may vary,” “paid partnership,” or any mandatory safety notes (only if truly required for your category).
• Prohibited topics: sensitive topics, competitor comparisons, restricted audiences.
• Approval workflow: what must be pre-approved and what can be posted without review (keep this minimal but clear).

Preventing misleading claims: a practical “claims ladder”

Many compliance problems come from creators overpromising. Use a claims ladder to keep language safe:

• Level 1 (safest): personal experience and product features. Example: “I like how lightweight this is.”
• Level 2: typical benefits with soft language. Example: “This helped me stay more consistent.”
• Level 3 (higher risk): quantified results. Example: “I lost 10 pounds in 2 weeks.” (often problematic unless substantiated and properly contextualized)
• Level 4 (avoid): guarantees, medical/financial promises, or “before/after” implications that suggest typical results. Example: “Guaranteed to cure,” “You will make $5k/month.”

Operationally, allow Levels 1–2 by default, require written substantiation and explicit approval for Level 3, and prohibit Level 4.

Step-by-step: compliance review workflow that doesn’t slow you down

1. Pre-brief: send the compliance kit + 3–5 “safe phrases” creators can use.
2. Creator self-check: ask creators to confirm (checkbox style) that disclosure is included and claims are within boundaries.
3. Spot-check review: review only high-risk categories (health, finance, kids, regulated products) or high-reach creators.
4. Publish verification: within 30–60 minutes of posting, verify disclosure placement and that the final edit matches approved language.
5. Document: save screenshots/links of the disclosure and the content for your records.

Brand safety controls

Define your brand safety boundaries (before outreach)

Brand safety means ensuring the creator’s content, behavior, and community context won’t create reputational harm for your brand. Create a simple “brand safety matrix” with three tiers:

• Green (OK): topics and tones aligned with your brand.
• Yellow (review): topics that may be acceptable with guardrails (e.g., mild profanity, edgy humor, political references in passing).
• Red (no-go): hate speech, harassment, dangerous misinformation, explicit content (if not aligned), illegal activity, or anything that conflicts with your values and customer expectations.

Controls for sensitive topics and creator behavior

Implement lightweight checks that catch most issues:

• Content scan: review the last 30–60 days of posts for recurring themes, tone, and controversy patterns.
• Comment/community scan: check whether the creator’s audience is prone to harassment, spam, or extremist content that could appear under your sponsored post.
• Off-platform signals: look for recent public controversies, repeated callouts, or pattern of inflammatory posting.
• “Adjacent content” risk: consider what appears immediately before/after the sponsored content (e.g., a risky rant followed by your ad).

Competitor mentions and comparison claims

Competitor talk can create legal and reputational risk. Set clear rules:

• No direct competitor callouts unless you explicitly allow it and have approved comparison language.
• No “best/number one” claims unless you can substantiate them.
• No disparagement: creators should not insult competitor products or users.

Provide safe alternatives creators can use:

• “This is what I like about [Brand]…” (focus on your product)
• “I’ve tried a few options; this fits my routine because…” (no naming)

Prohibited claims and restricted categories

Even outside regulated industries, some claims are consistently risky:

• Health/medical: curing, treating, preventing disease; “clinically proven” without proof; unsafe usage instructions.
• Financial: guaranteed earnings, “passive income” certainty, unrealistic ROI promises.
• Safety: “100% safe,” “no side effects,” or encouraging dangerous behavior.
• Identity and protected classes: stereotyping, exclusionary messaging, or inflammatory generalizations.

If you operate in a regulated category, add category-specific rules and require stricter pre-approval.

Crisis response: what to do if backlash occurs

Backlash can come from the creator’s behavior, the content itself, or audience interpretation. The key is to respond with speed, consistency, and documentation.

Step-by-step crisis response playbook

1. Detect and triage: identify what’s happening (misleading claim, offensive statement, disclosure missing, product issue, external controversy).
2. Pause amplification: stop resharing, paid boosting, or additional posts until assessed.
3. Preserve evidence: capture screenshots, URLs, timestamps, and engagement context.
4. Assess severity (use a simple scale):
   • Low: minor disclosure placement issue, fixable quickly.
   • Medium: misleading claim, heated comments, misinterpretation spreading.
   • High: hate speech, dangerous misinformation, major controversy, legal risk.
5. Choose action: edit caption, add disclosure, pin clarification, remove content, or terminate partnership.
6. Coordinate messaging: align internal stakeholders (marketing, legal/compliance, customer support). Provide a short response script if needed.
7. Creator instruction: give the creator exact steps (e.g., “Add ‘Ad’ to first line, remove claim X, post clarification in story”).
8. Monitor for 24–72 hours: track sentiment, comment themes, and any press pickup.

Keep responses factual and avoid arguing in comments. If you need to correct misinformation, do it once clearly, then redirect to support channels.

Fraud prevention during and after campaigns

What fraud looks like in influencer marketing

Fraud can be intentional (bought followers, bot comments) or structural (incentivized traffic that doesn’t convert, coupon leakage). The risk is not only wasted spend; it can also distort your learnings and cause downstream issues like refunds and chargebacks.

Monitoring sudden metric anomalies (during campaign)

Set expectations for “normal” performance ranges, then watch for spikes that don’t match typical audience behavior.

• Engagement spikes without reach growth: unusually high likes/comments with flat views can indicate engagement pods or purchased interactions.
• View spikes at odd hours: sudden bursts from time zones that don’t match the creator’s audience.
• High clicks with near-zero time on site: suggests low-quality or automated traffic.
• Unusual device/browser mix: heavy concentration in one device type or outdated browsers can be a bot signal.

Step-by-step: anomaly check routine

1. Baseline: record typical ranges for the creator (views, engagement rate, click-through patterns) from prior posts if available.
2. Set triggers: define thresholds (e.g., “clicks up 300% vs. expected with conversion rate down 80%”).
3. Check source breakdown: look at geography, device, referral sources, and landing page behavior.
4. Compare to other creators: if one creator is an outlier in clicks but not in sales, investigate.
5. Escalate: ask the creator about any unusual promotion methods (e.g., external groups, paid traffic) and remind them of prohibited tactics.

Verifying traffic quality (without repeating attribution basics)

Even if you already track links/codes, add quality checks to confirm the traffic is real and relevant:

• Session quality: time on site, pages per session, scroll depth, add-to-cart rate.
• Geo alignment: traffic should broadly match the creator’s audience locations and your shipping/serving regions.
• New vs. returning mix: extreme skew can indicate coupon sites or leakage.
• Conversion path sanity: if many purchases happen with no product page views, investigate (could be code leakage or direct-to-checkout behavior from non-creator sources).

Code abuse detection (during and after)

Promo codes are especially vulnerable to leakage onto coupon sites, deal forums, browser extensions, and employee/customer sharing. Abuse can also happen when creators share codes in unintended places.

Signals of code abuse

• Redemption volume exceeds expected reach (e.g., small creator, huge code usage).
• High repeat usage by the same customers when the code is intended for new customers only.
• Orders coming from geographies outside the creator’s audience.
• Code appears on coupon aggregators shortly after posting.

Step-by-step: code abuse response

1. Confirm leakage: search the code on major search engines and coupon sites; check affiliate/coupon extension reports if available.
2. Segment redemptions: new vs. returning customers, geo, AOV, and refund rate.
3. Apply controls: restrict to first-time buyers, set expiry, set minimum cart value, limit redemptions per customer, or restrict to specific products.
4. Rotate: replace the code if it has spread widely.
5. Creator follow-up: verify where they posted it; remind them not to share in prohibited channels (e.g., deal groups) if that’s your policy.

Chargebacks and refund spikes (post-campaign fraud and quality risk)

Refunds and chargebacks can indicate mismatched expectations (misleading claims), low-quality traffic, or outright fraud. Track these after the campaign, not just during.

• Refund rate spike: may indicate the creator oversold benefits or attracted bargain hunters.
• Chargeback spike: can indicate stolen payment methods or suspicious traffic sources.
• High “item not as described” reasons: often ties back to claims made in content.

Step-by-step: post-campaign audit

1. Set a review window: evaluate refunds/chargebacks at 7, 14, and 30 days after the main posting date.
2. Compare cohorts: compare creator-driven customers to your baseline customers on refund rate, chargeback rate, and repeat purchase.
3. Map reasons to content: if refunds cite expectations, review the creator’s wording and visuals for misleading implications.
4. Decide remediation: tighten claim guidance, adjust targeting/creator selection, or discontinue the partnership.

Risk checklist (use before, during, and after)

Compliance checklist

• Disclosure label is approved (Ad/Sponsored) and placed correctly for the format.
• Disclosure is visible/readable (contrast, size, duration) and appears early.
• Claims are within allowed boundaries; no guarantees or unsubstantiated results.
• Any required qualifiers are included (only where truly necessary).
• Content does not encourage unsafe use or prohibited behavior.
• Records saved: screenshots/links showing disclosure and final content.

Brand safety checklist

• Creator’s recent content aligns with your Green/Yellow/Red matrix.
• No recent controversies that conflict with your brand values.
• No competitor mentions or comparisons unless explicitly approved.
• No sensitive-topic triggers (politics, tragedy, hate, harassment) adjacent to the sponsored post.
• Comment section risk considered (moderation plan if needed).
• Crisis playbook owner assigned and response steps defined.

Fraud prevention checklist

• Baseline performance expectations documented (views, engagement, traffic quality).
• Anomaly triggers defined (spike thresholds and what to check).
• Traffic quality monitored (geo/device/session behavior).
• Promo code leakage checks scheduled (search + redemption pattern review).
• Refund/chargeback monitoring scheduled for 7/14/30 days.
• Escalation path defined (who investigates, who decides actions).

Decision framework: when to end a partnership

Ending a partnership should be a structured decision, not an emotional reaction. Use a two-axis approach: severity (harm potential) and pattern (one-off vs. repeated).

Step 1: classify the issue

Step 2: apply the “3R” test (Remedy, Recurrence, Risk)

• Remedy: Can the issue be corrected quickly (edit, disclosure add, clarification) and verified?
• Recurrence: Has the creator made similar mistakes before or ignored guidance?
• Risk: What is the potential harm (legal exposure, customer harm, reputational damage, financial loss)?

Step 3: choose an action tier

• Tier A: Continue with correction
  • Use when: low severity, first-time issue, creator is responsive.
  • Actions: fix disclosure/wording, document, add extra spot-checking for next post.
• Tier B: Pause and remediate
  • Use when: medium severity or unclear facts (possible fraud, misleading claim).
  • Actions: pause further posts, investigate metrics/refunds, require revised content standards, possibly rotate codes or restrict offers.
• Tier C: End partnership
  • Use when: high severity (harmful content, repeated non-compliance, confirmed fraud, refusal to correct, or major reputational risk).
  • Actions: stop all scheduled content, request takedown where appropriate, document evidence, and align internal comms for customer support and public response.

Practical “end partnership” triggers (set these in advance)

• Refusal to add/maintain clear disclosure after being instructed.
• Repeated misleading claims after correction requests.
• Any hate speech, harassment, or dangerous misinformation tied to the creator’s content.
• Confirmed purchased engagement/traffic or deliberate code leakage tactics.
• Refund/chargeback rates materially above baseline with evidence pointing to creator-driven misrepresentation or low-quality traffic.